Cargando…

Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The impact of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use on the risk of oral cavity cancer (OCC) has been confirmed; however, the sex-based difference in this association remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the association between SLT use and OCC risk in women and compared it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mu, Guangyan, Wang, Jiayi, Liu, Zhiyan, Zhang, Hanxu, Zhou, Shuang, Xiang, Qian, Cui, Yimin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08691-x
_version_ 1783743885234667520
author Mu, Guangyan
Wang, Jiayi
Liu, Zhiyan
Zhang, Hanxu
Zhou, Shuang
Xiang, Qian
Cui, Yimin
author_facet Mu, Guangyan
Wang, Jiayi
Liu, Zhiyan
Zhang, Hanxu
Zhou, Shuang
Xiang, Qian
Cui, Yimin
author_sort Mu, Guangyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use on the risk of oral cavity cancer (OCC) has been confirmed; however, the sex-based difference in this association remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the association between SLT use and OCC risk in women and compared it to that in men. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies from their inception up to August 2020. Studies reporting the effect estimates of SLT use on OCC risk in men and women, were eligible for inclusion. The relative risk ratio (RRR) was applied to calculate the sex-based difference in the relationship between SLT use and OCC risk, and pooled analysis was conducted using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. RESULTS: Nineteen studies reporting a total of 6593 OCC cases were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled relative risk (RR) suggested that SLT use was associated with an increased risk of OCC in both men (RR, 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05–4.20; P < 0.001) and women (RR, 6.39; 95%CI, 3.16–12.93; P < 0.001). Moreover, the SLT-use-related risk of OCC was higher in women than that in men (RRR,1.79; 95%C, 1.21–2.64; P = 0.003). The risk of OCC related to SLT use in women was still significantly higher than that in men (RRR, 1.75; 95%CI, 1.15–2.66; P = 0.008) after excluding indirect comparison results. Finally, a subgroup analysis suggested significant sex-based differences only in individuals who received chewed smokeless products, regardless of the control definition. Pooled analysis of studies with high design quality confirmed the notably higher risk of OCC in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that SLT use was associated with a higher risk of OCC in women than in men. Further large-scale prospective cohort studies should be conducted to verify sex-based differences in the association between use of specific smokeless products and OCC risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8394164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83941642021-08-30 Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mu, Guangyan Wang, Jiayi Liu, Zhiyan Zhang, Hanxu Zhou, Shuang Xiang, Qian Cui, Yimin BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The impact of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use on the risk of oral cavity cancer (OCC) has been confirmed; however, the sex-based difference in this association remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the association between SLT use and OCC risk in women and compared it to that in men. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies from their inception up to August 2020. Studies reporting the effect estimates of SLT use on OCC risk in men and women, were eligible for inclusion. The relative risk ratio (RRR) was applied to calculate the sex-based difference in the relationship between SLT use and OCC risk, and pooled analysis was conducted using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. RESULTS: Nineteen studies reporting a total of 6593 OCC cases were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled relative risk (RR) suggested that SLT use was associated with an increased risk of OCC in both men (RR, 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05–4.20; P < 0.001) and women (RR, 6.39; 95%CI, 3.16–12.93; P < 0.001). Moreover, the SLT-use-related risk of OCC was higher in women than that in men (RRR,1.79; 95%C, 1.21–2.64; P = 0.003). The risk of OCC related to SLT use in women was still significantly higher than that in men (RRR, 1.75; 95%CI, 1.15–2.66; P = 0.008) after excluding indirect comparison results. Finally, a subgroup analysis suggested significant sex-based differences only in individuals who received chewed smokeless products, regardless of the control definition. Pooled analysis of studies with high design quality confirmed the notably higher risk of OCC in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that SLT use was associated with a higher risk of OCC in women than in men. Further large-scale prospective cohort studies should be conducted to verify sex-based differences in the association between use of specific smokeless products and OCC risk. BioMed Central 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8394164/ /pubmed/34452595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08691-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mu, Guangyan
Wang, Jiayi
Liu, Zhiyan
Zhang, Hanxu
Zhou, Shuang
Xiang, Qian
Cui, Yimin
Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08691-x
work_keys_str_mv AT muguangyan associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangjiayi associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuzhiyan associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghanxu associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhoushuang associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiangqian associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cuiyimin associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis