Cargando…
Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The impact of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use on the risk of oral cavity cancer (OCC) has been confirmed; however, the sex-based difference in this association remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the association between SLT use and OCC risk in women and compared it...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08691-x |
_version_ | 1783743885234667520 |
---|---|
author | Mu, Guangyan Wang, Jiayi Liu, Zhiyan Zhang, Hanxu Zhou, Shuang Xiang, Qian Cui, Yimin |
author_facet | Mu, Guangyan Wang, Jiayi Liu, Zhiyan Zhang, Hanxu Zhou, Shuang Xiang, Qian Cui, Yimin |
author_sort | Mu, Guangyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The impact of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use on the risk of oral cavity cancer (OCC) has been confirmed; however, the sex-based difference in this association remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the association between SLT use and OCC risk in women and compared it to that in men. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies from their inception up to August 2020. Studies reporting the effect estimates of SLT use on OCC risk in men and women, were eligible for inclusion. The relative risk ratio (RRR) was applied to calculate the sex-based difference in the relationship between SLT use and OCC risk, and pooled analysis was conducted using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. RESULTS: Nineteen studies reporting a total of 6593 OCC cases were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled relative risk (RR) suggested that SLT use was associated with an increased risk of OCC in both men (RR, 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05–4.20; P < 0.001) and women (RR, 6.39; 95%CI, 3.16–12.93; P < 0.001). Moreover, the SLT-use-related risk of OCC was higher in women than that in men (RRR,1.79; 95%C, 1.21–2.64; P = 0.003). The risk of OCC related to SLT use in women was still significantly higher than that in men (RRR, 1.75; 95%CI, 1.15–2.66; P = 0.008) after excluding indirect comparison results. Finally, a subgroup analysis suggested significant sex-based differences only in individuals who received chewed smokeless products, regardless of the control definition. Pooled analysis of studies with high design quality confirmed the notably higher risk of OCC in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that SLT use was associated with a higher risk of OCC in women than in men. Further large-scale prospective cohort studies should be conducted to verify sex-based differences in the association between use of specific smokeless products and OCC risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8394164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83941642021-08-30 Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mu, Guangyan Wang, Jiayi Liu, Zhiyan Zhang, Hanxu Zhou, Shuang Xiang, Qian Cui, Yimin BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The impact of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use on the risk of oral cavity cancer (OCC) has been confirmed; however, the sex-based difference in this association remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the association between SLT use and OCC risk in women and compared it to that in men. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies from their inception up to August 2020. Studies reporting the effect estimates of SLT use on OCC risk in men and women, were eligible for inclusion. The relative risk ratio (RRR) was applied to calculate the sex-based difference in the relationship between SLT use and OCC risk, and pooled analysis was conducted using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. RESULTS: Nineteen studies reporting a total of 6593 OCC cases were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled relative risk (RR) suggested that SLT use was associated with an increased risk of OCC in both men (RR, 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05–4.20; P < 0.001) and women (RR, 6.39; 95%CI, 3.16–12.93; P < 0.001). Moreover, the SLT-use-related risk of OCC was higher in women than that in men (RRR,1.79; 95%C, 1.21–2.64; P = 0.003). The risk of OCC related to SLT use in women was still significantly higher than that in men (RRR, 1.75; 95%CI, 1.15–2.66; P = 0.008) after excluding indirect comparison results. Finally, a subgroup analysis suggested significant sex-based differences only in individuals who received chewed smokeless products, regardless of the control definition. Pooled analysis of studies with high design quality confirmed the notably higher risk of OCC in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that SLT use was associated with a higher risk of OCC in women than in men. Further large-scale prospective cohort studies should be conducted to verify sex-based differences in the association between use of specific smokeless products and OCC risk. BioMed Central 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8394164/ /pubmed/34452595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08691-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mu, Guangyan Wang, Jiayi Liu, Zhiyan Zhang, Hanxu Zhou, Shuang Xiang, Qian Cui, Yimin Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08691-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muguangyan associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangjiayi associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuzhiyan associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghanxu associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhoushuang associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiangqian associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cuiyimin associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |