Cargando…

Does Self-Perception Equal the Truth When Judging Own Body Weight and Height?

Background: Data from the research project “Fitness clubs—a venue for public health?” provided an opportunity to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported body weight and height, and subsequent Body Mass Index (BMI), as well as the “trueness” of novice exercisers perception of weight status category, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haakstad, Lene A. H., Stensrud, Trine, Gjestvang, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168502
_version_ 1783743888066871296
author Haakstad, Lene A. H.
Stensrud, Trine
Gjestvang, Christina
author_facet Haakstad, Lene A. H.
Stensrud, Trine
Gjestvang, Christina
author_sort Haakstad, Lene A. H.
collection PubMed
description Background: Data from the research project “Fitness clubs—a venue for public health?” provided an opportunity to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported body weight and height, and subsequent Body Mass Index (BMI), as well as the “trueness” of novice exercisers perception of weight status category, which has not been examined in this population. The aims were to examine self-reported body weight, height, and calculated BMI data from an online survey compared with measured data at fitness club start-up, investigate how accurately novice exercisers place themselves within self-classified weight group (underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese), and compare this with fitness club attendance at three months follow-up. Methods: Prior to anthropometric measurements, 62 men and 63 women responded to an online questionnaire, including body weight (kilogram, kg) and height (centimeters, cm), and self-classified weight group (“I think I am … underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese”). We used the following statistical analysis: Paired sample t-tests, a Bland–Altman plot kappa statistics, chi-squared tests, and a logistic regression. Results: Mean difference of BMI calculated from self-reported and measured data was 0.06 (95% CI −0.29 to 0.17, p = 0.593) in men, and 0.16 (95% CI −0.40 to 0.09, p = 0.224) in women, with four participants being outliers of the 95% limits of agreement (Bland-Altman plot). Allowing a difference of 0.5 kg between self-reported and measured weight, we found that 16% reported their weight correctly, 31.2% underreported (−1.89 ± 1.59 kg), and 52.8% overreported (1.85 ± 1.23 kg), with no sex differences (p = 0.870). Further, our results suggest that both sexes may have difficulty recognizing overweight/obesity in themselves, and particularly men are likely to underreport their perceived weight group compared with women. More than half (53.3%) of the overweight men perceived themselves to be normal weight (women: 14%), and only 33.3% of obese men and women correctly classified themselves as being obese. We did not find any difference between participants correctly or incorrectly classifying weight group and fitness club attendance (≥2 times a week) at three months follow-up. Conclusion: Both sexes reported body weight and height reasonably accurately, and BMI based on self-report appears to be valid measure. Still, a large proportion of novice exercisers do not recognise their own overweight or obesity status, which may in part explain why public health campaigns do not reach risk populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8394179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83941792021-08-28 Does Self-Perception Equal the Truth When Judging Own Body Weight and Height? Haakstad, Lene A. H. Stensrud, Trine Gjestvang, Christina Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Data from the research project “Fitness clubs—a venue for public health?” provided an opportunity to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported body weight and height, and subsequent Body Mass Index (BMI), as well as the “trueness” of novice exercisers perception of weight status category, which has not been examined in this population. The aims were to examine self-reported body weight, height, and calculated BMI data from an online survey compared with measured data at fitness club start-up, investigate how accurately novice exercisers place themselves within self-classified weight group (underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese), and compare this with fitness club attendance at three months follow-up. Methods: Prior to anthropometric measurements, 62 men and 63 women responded to an online questionnaire, including body weight (kilogram, kg) and height (centimeters, cm), and self-classified weight group (“I think I am … underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese”). We used the following statistical analysis: Paired sample t-tests, a Bland–Altman plot kappa statistics, chi-squared tests, and a logistic regression. Results: Mean difference of BMI calculated from self-reported and measured data was 0.06 (95% CI −0.29 to 0.17, p = 0.593) in men, and 0.16 (95% CI −0.40 to 0.09, p = 0.224) in women, with four participants being outliers of the 95% limits of agreement (Bland-Altman plot). Allowing a difference of 0.5 kg between self-reported and measured weight, we found that 16% reported their weight correctly, 31.2% underreported (−1.89 ± 1.59 kg), and 52.8% overreported (1.85 ± 1.23 kg), with no sex differences (p = 0.870). Further, our results suggest that both sexes may have difficulty recognizing overweight/obesity in themselves, and particularly men are likely to underreport their perceived weight group compared with women. More than half (53.3%) of the overweight men perceived themselves to be normal weight (women: 14%), and only 33.3% of obese men and women correctly classified themselves as being obese. We did not find any difference between participants correctly or incorrectly classifying weight group and fitness club attendance (≥2 times a week) at three months follow-up. Conclusion: Both sexes reported body weight and height reasonably accurately, and BMI based on self-report appears to be valid measure. Still, a large proportion of novice exercisers do not recognise their own overweight or obesity status, which may in part explain why public health campaigns do not reach risk populations. MDPI 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8394179/ /pubmed/34444251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168502 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Haakstad, Lene A. H.
Stensrud, Trine
Gjestvang, Christina
Does Self-Perception Equal the Truth When Judging Own Body Weight and Height?
title Does Self-Perception Equal the Truth When Judging Own Body Weight and Height?
title_full Does Self-Perception Equal the Truth When Judging Own Body Weight and Height?
title_fullStr Does Self-Perception Equal the Truth When Judging Own Body Weight and Height?
title_full_unstemmed Does Self-Perception Equal the Truth When Judging Own Body Weight and Height?
title_short Does Self-Perception Equal the Truth When Judging Own Body Weight and Height?
title_sort does self-perception equal the truth when judging own body weight and height?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168502
work_keys_str_mv AT haakstadleneah doesselfperceptionequalthetruthwhenjudgingownbodyweightandheight
AT stensrudtrine doesselfperceptionequalthetruthwhenjudgingownbodyweightandheight
AT gjestvangchristina doesselfperceptionequalthetruthwhenjudgingownbodyweightandheight