Cargando…

Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?

Endoscopically placed intragastric balloons (IGBs) have played a significant role in obesity treatment over the last 30 years, successfully bridging the gap between lifestyle modification/pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery. Since they provide a continuous sensation of satiety that helps the inges...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stavrou, George, Shrewsbury, Anne, Kotzampassi, Katerina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512874
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.238
_version_ 1783743888519856128
author Stavrou, George
Shrewsbury, Anne
Kotzampassi, Katerina
author_facet Stavrou, George
Shrewsbury, Anne
Kotzampassi, Katerina
author_sort Stavrou, George
collection PubMed
description Endoscopically placed intragastric balloons (IGBs) have played a significant role in obesity treatment over the last 30 years, successfully bridging the gap between lifestyle modification/pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery. Since they provide a continuous sensation of satiety that helps the ingestion of smaller portions of food, facilitating maintenance of a low-calorie diet, they have generally been considered an effective and reversible, less invasive, non-surgical procedure for weight loss. However, some studies indicate that balloons have limited sustainable effectiveness for the vast majority attempting such therapy, resulting in a return to the previous weight after balloon removal. In this review we try to summarize the pros and cons of various balloon types, to guide decision making for both the physician and the obese individual looking for effective treatment. We analyzed the six most commonly used IGBs, namely the liquid-filled balloons Orbera, Spatz3, ReShape Duo and Elipse, and the gas-filled Heliosphere and Obalon - also including comments on the adjustable Spatz3, and the swallowable Obalon and Elipse - to optimize the choice for maximum efficacy and safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8394181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83941812021-09-09 Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose? Stavrou, George Shrewsbury, Anne Kotzampassi, Katerina World J Gastrointest Endosc Review Endoscopically placed intragastric balloons (IGBs) have played a significant role in obesity treatment over the last 30 years, successfully bridging the gap between lifestyle modification/pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery. Since they provide a continuous sensation of satiety that helps the ingestion of smaller portions of food, facilitating maintenance of a low-calorie diet, they have generally been considered an effective and reversible, less invasive, non-surgical procedure for weight loss. However, some studies indicate that balloons have limited sustainable effectiveness for the vast majority attempting such therapy, resulting in a return to the previous weight after balloon removal. In this review we try to summarize the pros and cons of various balloon types, to guide decision making for both the physician and the obese individual looking for effective treatment. We analyzed the six most commonly used IGBs, namely the liquid-filled balloons Orbera, Spatz3, ReShape Duo and Elipse, and the gas-filled Heliosphere and Obalon - also including comments on the adjustable Spatz3, and the swallowable Obalon and Elipse - to optimize the choice for maximum efficacy and safety. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-08-16 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8394181/ /pubmed/34512874 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.238 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Review
Stavrou, George
Shrewsbury, Anne
Kotzampassi, Katerina
Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?
title Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?
title_full Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?
title_fullStr Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?
title_full_unstemmed Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?
title_short Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?
title_sort six intragastric balloons: which to choose?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512874
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.238
work_keys_str_mv AT stavrougeorge sixintragastricballoonswhichtochoose
AT shrewsburyanne sixintragastricballoonswhichtochoose
AT kotzampassikaterina sixintragastricballoonswhichtochoose