Cargando…
Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?
Endoscopically placed intragastric balloons (IGBs) have played a significant role in obesity treatment over the last 30 years, successfully bridging the gap between lifestyle modification/pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery. Since they provide a continuous sensation of satiety that helps the inges...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512874 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.238 |
_version_ | 1783743888519856128 |
---|---|
author | Stavrou, George Shrewsbury, Anne Kotzampassi, Katerina |
author_facet | Stavrou, George Shrewsbury, Anne Kotzampassi, Katerina |
author_sort | Stavrou, George |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endoscopically placed intragastric balloons (IGBs) have played a significant role in obesity treatment over the last 30 years, successfully bridging the gap between lifestyle modification/pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery. Since they provide a continuous sensation of satiety that helps the ingestion of smaller portions of food, facilitating maintenance of a low-calorie diet, they have generally been considered an effective and reversible, less invasive, non-surgical procedure for weight loss. However, some studies indicate that balloons have limited sustainable effectiveness for the vast majority attempting such therapy, resulting in a return to the previous weight after balloon removal. In this review we try to summarize the pros and cons of various balloon types, to guide decision making for both the physician and the obese individual looking for effective treatment. We analyzed the six most commonly used IGBs, namely the liquid-filled balloons Orbera, Spatz3, ReShape Duo and Elipse, and the gas-filled Heliosphere and Obalon - also including comments on the adjustable Spatz3, and the swallowable Obalon and Elipse - to optimize the choice for maximum efficacy and safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8394181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83941812021-09-09 Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose? Stavrou, George Shrewsbury, Anne Kotzampassi, Katerina World J Gastrointest Endosc Review Endoscopically placed intragastric balloons (IGBs) have played a significant role in obesity treatment over the last 30 years, successfully bridging the gap between lifestyle modification/pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery. Since they provide a continuous sensation of satiety that helps the ingestion of smaller portions of food, facilitating maintenance of a low-calorie diet, they have generally been considered an effective and reversible, less invasive, non-surgical procedure for weight loss. However, some studies indicate that balloons have limited sustainable effectiveness for the vast majority attempting such therapy, resulting in a return to the previous weight after balloon removal. In this review we try to summarize the pros and cons of various balloon types, to guide decision making for both the physician and the obese individual looking for effective treatment. We analyzed the six most commonly used IGBs, namely the liquid-filled balloons Orbera, Spatz3, ReShape Duo and Elipse, and the gas-filled Heliosphere and Obalon - also including comments on the adjustable Spatz3, and the swallowable Obalon and Elipse - to optimize the choice for maximum efficacy and safety. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-08-16 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8394181/ /pubmed/34512874 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.238 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Review Stavrou, George Shrewsbury, Anne Kotzampassi, Katerina Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose? |
title | Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose? |
title_full | Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose? |
title_fullStr | Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose? |
title_full_unstemmed | Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose? |
title_short | Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose? |
title_sort | six intragastric balloons: which to choose? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512874 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stavrougeorge sixintragastricballoonswhichtochoose AT shrewsburyanne sixintragastricballoonswhichtochoose AT kotzampassikaterina sixintragastricballoonswhichtochoose |