Cargando…

Bioelectric Effect of a Microcurrent Toothbrush on Plaque Removal

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a microcurrent toothbrush (approved by the US Food and Drug Administration [FDA]), which employs a superimposed alternating and direct electric current, named as a Proxywave(®) technology, similar to the intensity of the biocurrent, in plaque removal and red...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Ji-Hyun, Ha, Jin-Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444003
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168255
_version_ 1783743965143498752
author Lee, Ji-Hyun
Ha, Jin-Hee
author_facet Lee, Ji-Hyun
Ha, Jin-Hee
author_sort Lee, Ji-Hyun
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated the effectiveness of a microcurrent toothbrush (approved by the US Food and Drug Administration [FDA]), which employs a superimposed alternating and direct electric current, named as a Proxywave(®) technology, similar to the intensity of the biocurrent, in plaque removal and reducing gingivitis by biofilm removal through the bioelectric effect. This study enrolled 40 volunteers with gingivitis. Dental observations were made every two weeks, before and after the use of each toothbrush. We randomly assigned participants into two groups: one group used the Proxywave(®) toothbrush (PB) for two weeks followed by the control toothbrush (CB) for two weeks, while the other group used the CB for two weeks followed by the PB. The participants had a two-week washout period. If the toothbrush used earlier has had an effect on the bacterial flora in the oral cavity, this is to remove this effect and return it to its previous state. During each dental visit, we recorded plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) scores. The PI and GI scores were significantly lower in both the PB and the CB (p < 0.05). Considering the PI, there was no significant difference between the toothbrushes on all the surfaces. Considering the GI, the PB showed a significant decrease in the interproximal surface, compared to the CB (p < 0.05). The PB showed a significant decrease in the interproximal GI and had a beneficial effect in the interproximal area where the bristles could not reach. No adverse events were observed in the participants during the clinical trial. The microcurrent toothbrush is a device that can be safely used for plaque removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8394510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83945102021-08-28 Bioelectric Effect of a Microcurrent Toothbrush on Plaque Removal Lee, Ji-Hyun Ha, Jin-Hee Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study evaluated the effectiveness of a microcurrent toothbrush (approved by the US Food and Drug Administration [FDA]), which employs a superimposed alternating and direct electric current, named as a Proxywave(®) technology, similar to the intensity of the biocurrent, in plaque removal and reducing gingivitis by biofilm removal through the bioelectric effect. This study enrolled 40 volunteers with gingivitis. Dental observations were made every two weeks, before and after the use of each toothbrush. We randomly assigned participants into two groups: one group used the Proxywave(®) toothbrush (PB) for two weeks followed by the control toothbrush (CB) for two weeks, while the other group used the CB for two weeks followed by the PB. The participants had a two-week washout period. If the toothbrush used earlier has had an effect on the bacterial flora in the oral cavity, this is to remove this effect and return it to its previous state. During each dental visit, we recorded plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) scores. The PI and GI scores were significantly lower in both the PB and the CB (p < 0.05). Considering the PI, there was no significant difference between the toothbrushes on all the surfaces. Considering the GI, the PB showed a significant decrease in the interproximal surface, compared to the CB (p < 0.05). The PB showed a significant decrease in the interproximal GI and had a beneficial effect in the interproximal area where the bristles could not reach. No adverse events were observed in the participants during the clinical trial. The microcurrent toothbrush is a device that can be safely used for plaque removal. MDPI 2021-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8394510/ /pubmed/34444003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168255 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Ji-Hyun
Ha, Jin-Hee
Bioelectric Effect of a Microcurrent Toothbrush on Plaque Removal
title Bioelectric Effect of a Microcurrent Toothbrush on Plaque Removal
title_full Bioelectric Effect of a Microcurrent Toothbrush on Plaque Removal
title_fullStr Bioelectric Effect of a Microcurrent Toothbrush on Plaque Removal
title_full_unstemmed Bioelectric Effect of a Microcurrent Toothbrush on Plaque Removal
title_short Bioelectric Effect of a Microcurrent Toothbrush on Plaque Removal
title_sort bioelectric effect of a microcurrent toothbrush on plaque removal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444003
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168255
work_keys_str_mv AT leejihyun bioelectriceffectofamicrocurrenttoothbrushonplaqueremoval
AT hajinhee bioelectriceffectofamicrocurrenttoothbrushonplaqueremoval