Relationship between the presence of dedicated doctors in rapid response systems and patient outcome: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Rapid response systems (RRSs) improve patients’ safety, but the role of dedicated doctors within these systems remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate patient survival rates and differences in types of interventions performed depending on the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyung-Jun, Jeon, Kyeongman, Kang, Byung Ju, Ahn, Jong-Joon, Hong, Sang-Bum, Lee, Dong-Hyun, Moon, Jae Young, Kim, Jung Soo, Park, Jisoo, Cho, Jae Hwa, Lee, Sang-Min, Lee, Yeon Joo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01824-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Rapid response systems (RRSs) improve patients’ safety, but the role of dedicated doctors within these systems remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate patient survival rates and differences in types of interventions performed depending on the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. METHODS: Patients managed by the RRSs of 9 centers in South Korea from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2017, were included retrospectively. We used propensity score-matched analysis to balance patients according to the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of interventions performed. A sensitivity analysis was performed with the subgroup of patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 2981 patients were included per group according to the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. The presence of the dedicated doctors was not associated with patients’ overall likelihood of survival (hazard ratio for death 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93‒1.20). Interventions, such as arterial line insertion (odds ratio [OR] 25.33, 95% CI 15.12‒42.44) and kidney replacement therapy (OR 10.77, 95% CI 6.10‒19.01), were more commonly performed for patients detected using RRS with dedicated doctors. The presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS was associated with better survival of patients with sepsis or septic shock (hazard ratio for death 0.62, 95% CI 0.39‒0.98) and lower intensive care unit admission rates (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37‒0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of dedicated doctors within the RRS was not associated with better survival in the overall population but with better survival and lower intensive care unit admission rates for patients with sepsis or septic shock. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01824-7.

Ejemplares similares