Cargando…

Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand?

Anal sphincter incontinence is a chronic disease, which dramatically impairs quality of life and induces high costs for the society. Surgery, considered as the best curative option, shows a disappointing success rate. Stem/progenitor cell therapy is pledging, for anal sphincter incontinence, a subst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balaphas, Alexandre, Meyer, Jeremy, Meier, Raphael P. H., Liot, Emilie, Buchs, Nicolas C., Roche, Bruno, Toso, Christian, Bühler, Leo H., Gonelle-Gispert, Carmen, Ris, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34440855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10082086
_version_ 1783744062755438592
author Balaphas, Alexandre
Meyer, Jeremy
Meier, Raphael P. H.
Liot, Emilie
Buchs, Nicolas C.
Roche, Bruno
Toso, Christian
Bühler, Leo H.
Gonelle-Gispert, Carmen
Ris, Frédéric
author_facet Balaphas, Alexandre
Meyer, Jeremy
Meier, Raphael P. H.
Liot, Emilie
Buchs, Nicolas C.
Roche, Bruno
Toso, Christian
Bühler, Leo H.
Gonelle-Gispert, Carmen
Ris, Frédéric
author_sort Balaphas, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description Anal sphincter incontinence is a chronic disease, which dramatically impairs quality of life and induces high costs for the society. Surgery, considered as the best curative option, shows a disappointing success rate. Stem/progenitor cell therapy is pledging, for anal sphincter incontinence, a substitute to surgery with higher efficacy. However, the published literature is disparate. Our aim was to perform a review on the development of cell therapy for anal sphincter incontinence with critical analyses of its pitfalls. Animal models for anal sphincter incontinence were varied and tried to reproduce distinct clinical situations (acute injury or healed injury with or without surgical reconstruction) but were limited by anatomical considerations. Cell preparations used for treatment, originated, in order of frequency, from skeletal muscle, bone marrow or fat tissue. The characterization of these preparations was often incomplete and stemness not always addressed. Despite a lack of understanding of sphincter healing processes and the exact mechanism of action of cell preparations, this treatment was evaluated in 83 incontinent patients, reporting encouraging results. However, further development is necessary to establish the correct indications, to determine the most-suited cell type, to standardize the cell preparation method and to validate the route and number of cell delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8394955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83949552021-08-28 Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand? Balaphas, Alexandre Meyer, Jeremy Meier, Raphael P. H. Liot, Emilie Buchs, Nicolas C. Roche, Bruno Toso, Christian Bühler, Leo H. Gonelle-Gispert, Carmen Ris, Frédéric Cells Review Anal sphincter incontinence is a chronic disease, which dramatically impairs quality of life and induces high costs for the society. Surgery, considered as the best curative option, shows a disappointing success rate. Stem/progenitor cell therapy is pledging, for anal sphincter incontinence, a substitute to surgery with higher efficacy. However, the published literature is disparate. Our aim was to perform a review on the development of cell therapy for anal sphincter incontinence with critical analyses of its pitfalls. Animal models for anal sphincter incontinence were varied and tried to reproduce distinct clinical situations (acute injury or healed injury with or without surgical reconstruction) but were limited by anatomical considerations. Cell preparations used for treatment, originated, in order of frequency, from skeletal muscle, bone marrow or fat tissue. The characterization of these preparations was often incomplete and stemness not always addressed. Despite a lack of understanding of sphincter healing processes and the exact mechanism of action of cell preparations, this treatment was evaluated in 83 incontinent patients, reporting encouraging results. However, further development is necessary to establish the correct indications, to determine the most-suited cell type, to standardize the cell preparation method and to validate the route and number of cell delivery. MDPI 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8394955/ /pubmed/34440855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10082086 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Balaphas, Alexandre
Meyer, Jeremy
Meier, Raphael P. H.
Liot, Emilie
Buchs, Nicolas C.
Roche, Bruno
Toso, Christian
Bühler, Leo H.
Gonelle-Gispert, Carmen
Ris, Frédéric
Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand?
title Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand?
title_full Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand?
title_fullStr Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand?
title_full_unstemmed Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand?
title_short Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand?
title_sort cell therapy for anal sphincter incontinence: where do we stand?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34440855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10082086
work_keys_str_mv AT balaphasalexandre celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand
AT meyerjeremy celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand
AT meierraphaelph celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand
AT liotemilie celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand
AT buchsnicolasc celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand
AT rochebruno celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand
AT tosochristian celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand
AT buhlerleoh celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand
AT gonellegispertcarmen celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand
AT risfrederic celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand