Cargando…
Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand?
Anal sphincter incontinence is a chronic disease, which dramatically impairs quality of life and induces high costs for the society. Surgery, considered as the best curative option, shows a disappointing success rate. Stem/progenitor cell therapy is pledging, for anal sphincter incontinence, a subst...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34440855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10082086 |
_version_ | 1783744062755438592 |
---|---|
author | Balaphas, Alexandre Meyer, Jeremy Meier, Raphael P. H. Liot, Emilie Buchs, Nicolas C. Roche, Bruno Toso, Christian Bühler, Leo H. Gonelle-Gispert, Carmen Ris, Frédéric |
author_facet | Balaphas, Alexandre Meyer, Jeremy Meier, Raphael P. H. Liot, Emilie Buchs, Nicolas C. Roche, Bruno Toso, Christian Bühler, Leo H. Gonelle-Gispert, Carmen Ris, Frédéric |
author_sort | Balaphas, Alexandre |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anal sphincter incontinence is a chronic disease, which dramatically impairs quality of life and induces high costs for the society. Surgery, considered as the best curative option, shows a disappointing success rate. Stem/progenitor cell therapy is pledging, for anal sphincter incontinence, a substitute to surgery with higher efficacy. However, the published literature is disparate. Our aim was to perform a review on the development of cell therapy for anal sphincter incontinence with critical analyses of its pitfalls. Animal models for anal sphincter incontinence were varied and tried to reproduce distinct clinical situations (acute injury or healed injury with or without surgical reconstruction) but were limited by anatomical considerations. Cell preparations used for treatment, originated, in order of frequency, from skeletal muscle, bone marrow or fat tissue. The characterization of these preparations was often incomplete and stemness not always addressed. Despite a lack of understanding of sphincter healing processes and the exact mechanism of action of cell preparations, this treatment was evaluated in 83 incontinent patients, reporting encouraging results. However, further development is necessary to establish the correct indications, to determine the most-suited cell type, to standardize the cell preparation method and to validate the route and number of cell delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8394955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83949552021-08-28 Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand? Balaphas, Alexandre Meyer, Jeremy Meier, Raphael P. H. Liot, Emilie Buchs, Nicolas C. Roche, Bruno Toso, Christian Bühler, Leo H. Gonelle-Gispert, Carmen Ris, Frédéric Cells Review Anal sphincter incontinence is a chronic disease, which dramatically impairs quality of life and induces high costs for the society. Surgery, considered as the best curative option, shows a disappointing success rate. Stem/progenitor cell therapy is pledging, for anal sphincter incontinence, a substitute to surgery with higher efficacy. However, the published literature is disparate. Our aim was to perform a review on the development of cell therapy for anal sphincter incontinence with critical analyses of its pitfalls. Animal models for anal sphincter incontinence were varied and tried to reproduce distinct clinical situations (acute injury or healed injury with or without surgical reconstruction) but were limited by anatomical considerations. Cell preparations used for treatment, originated, in order of frequency, from skeletal muscle, bone marrow or fat tissue. The characterization of these preparations was often incomplete and stemness not always addressed. Despite a lack of understanding of sphincter healing processes and the exact mechanism of action of cell preparations, this treatment was evaluated in 83 incontinent patients, reporting encouraging results. However, further development is necessary to establish the correct indications, to determine the most-suited cell type, to standardize the cell preparation method and to validate the route and number of cell delivery. MDPI 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8394955/ /pubmed/34440855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10082086 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Balaphas, Alexandre Meyer, Jeremy Meier, Raphael P. H. Liot, Emilie Buchs, Nicolas C. Roche, Bruno Toso, Christian Bühler, Leo H. Gonelle-Gispert, Carmen Ris, Frédéric Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand? |
title | Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand? |
title_full | Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand? |
title_fullStr | Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand? |
title_full_unstemmed | Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand? |
title_short | Cell Therapy for Anal Sphincter Incontinence: Where Do We Stand? |
title_sort | cell therapy for anal sphincter incontinence: where do we stand? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34440855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10082086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balaphasalexandre celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand AT meyerjeremy celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand AT meierraphaelph celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand AT liotemilie celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand AT buchsnicolasc celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand AT rochebruno celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand AT tosochristian celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand AT buhlerleoh celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand AT gonellegispertcarmen celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand AT risfrederic celltherapyforanalsphincterincontinencewheredowestand |