Cargando…
Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation
This is a retrospective radiographic review to assess post-operative sagittal plane deformities in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy type 2 that had been treated with posterior spinal instrumentation. Thirty-two patients with a history of either spinal fusion (N = 20) or growing rods (N = 12) we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34438594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8080703 |
_version_ | 1783744068792090624 |
---|---|
author | Halanski, Matthew A. Hanna, Rewais Bernatz, James Twedt, Max Sund, Sarah Patterson, Karen Noonan, Kenneth J. Schultz, Meredith Schroth, Mary K. Sharafinski, Mark Hasley, Brian P. |
author_facet | Halanski, Matthew A. Hanna, Rewais Bernatz, James Twedt, Max Sund, Sarah Patterson, Karen Noonan, Kenneth J. Schultz, Meredith Schroth, Mary K. Sharafinski, Mark Hasley, Brian P. |
author_sort | Halanski, Matthew A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This is a retrospective radiographic review to assess post-operative sagittal plane deformities in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy type 2 that had been treated with posterior spinal instrumentation. Thirty-two patients with a history of either spinal fusion (N = 20) or growing rods (N = 12) were identified with an average of 7.6 (2.1–16.6) years post-operative follow-up. Forty percent (13/32) of the patients were identified as having obvious “tucked chin” (N = 4), “tipped trunk” (N = 9), or both (N = 3). Sacral incidence was the only parameter that was statistically significant change between pre-operative or immediate post-operative measurements (66.9° vs. 55.2° p = 0.03). However, at final follow-up, the post-operative thoracic kyphosis had decreased over time in those that developed a subsequent sagittal deformity (24.2°) whereas it increased in those that did not (44.7°, p = 0.008). This decrease in thoracic kyphosis throughout the instrumented levels, resulted in a greater lordotic imbalance (30.4° vs. 5.6°, p = 0.001) throughout the instrumented levels in the group that developed the subsequent cervical or pelvic sagittal deformities. In conclusion, sagittal plane deformities commonly develop outside the instrumented levels in children with SMA type 2 following posterior spinal instrumentation and may be the result of lordotic imbalance that occurs through continued anterior growth following posterior instrumentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8394982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83949822021-08-28 Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation Halanski, Matthew A. Hanna, Rewais Bernatz, James Twedt, Max Sund, Sarah Patterson, Karen Noonan, Kenneth J. Schultz, Meredith Schroth, Mary K. Sharafinski, Mark Hasley, Brian P. Children (Basel) Article This is a retrospective radiographic review to assess post-operative sagittal plane deformities in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy type 2 that had been treated with posterior spinal instrumentation. Thirty-two patients with a history of either spinal fusion (N = 20) or growing rods (N = 12) were identified with an average of 7.6 (2.1–16.6) years post-operative follow-up. Forty percent (13/32) of the patients were identified as having obvious “tucked chin” (N = 4), “tipped trunk” (N = 9), or both (N = 3). Sacral incidence was the only parameter that was statistically significant change between pre-operative or immediate post-operative measurements (66.9° vs. 55.2° p = 0.03). However, at final follow-up, the post-operative thoracic kyphosis had decreased over time in those that developed a subsequent sagittal deformity (24.2°) whereas it increased in those that did not (44.7°, p = 0.008). This decrease in thoracic kyphosis throughout the instrumented levels, resulted in a greater lordotic imbalance (30.4° vs. 5.6°, p = 0.001) throughout the instrumented levels in the group that developed the subsequent cervical or pelvic sagittal deformities. In conclusion, sagittal plane deformities commonly develop outside the instrumented levels in children with SMA type 2 following posterior spinal instrumentation and may be the result of lordotic imbalance that occurs through continued anterior growth following posterior instrumentation. MDPI 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8394982/ /pubmed/34438594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8080703 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Halanski, Matthew A. Hanna, Rewais Bernatz, James Twedt, Max Sund, Sarah Patterson, Karen Noonan, Kenneth J. Schultz, Meredith Schroth, Mary K. Sharafinski, Mark Hasley, Brian P. Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation |
title | Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation |
title_full | Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation |
title_fullStr | Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation |
title_short | Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation |
title_sort | sagittal plane deformities in children with sma2 following posterior spinal instrumentation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34438594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8080703 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halanskimatthewa sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT hannarewais sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT bernatzjames sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT twedtmax sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT sundsarah sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT pattersonkaren sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT noonankennethj sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT schultzmeredith sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT schrothmaryk sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT sharafinskimark sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT hasleybrianp sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation |