Cargando…

Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation

This is a retrospective radiographic review to assess post-operative sagittal plane deformities in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy type 2 that had been treated with posterior spinal instrumentation. Thirty-two patients with a history of either spinal fusion (N = 20) or growing rods (N = 12) we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halanski, Matthew A., Hanna, Rewais, Bernatz, James, Twedt, Max, Sund, Sarah, Patterson, Karen, Noonan, Kenneth J., Schultz, Meredith, Schroth, Mary K., Sharafinski, Mark, Hasley, Brian P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34438594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8080703
_version_ 1783744068792090624
author Halanski, Matthew A.
Hanna, Rewais
Bernatz, James
Twedt, Max
Sund, Sarah
Patterson, Karen
Noonan, Kenneth J.
Schultz, Meredith
Schroth, Mary K.
Sharafinski, Mark
Hasley, Brian P.
author_facet Halanski, Matthew A.
Hanna, Rewais
Bernatz, James
Twedt, Max
Sund, Sarah
Patterson, Karen
Noonan, Kenneth J.
Schultz, Meredith
Schroth, Mary K.
Sharafinski, Mark
Hasley, Brian P.
author_sort Halanski, Matthew A.
collection PubMed
description This is a retrospective radiographic review to assess post-operative sagittal plane deformities in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy type 2 that had been treated with posterior spinal instrumentation. Thirty-two patients with a history of either spinal fusion (N = 20) or growing rods (N = 12) were identified with an average of 7.6 (2.1–16.6) years post-operative follow-up. Forty percent (13/32) of the patients were identified as having obvious “tucked chin” (N = 4), “tipped trunk” (N = 9), or both (N = 3). Sacral incidence was the only parameter that was statistically significant change between pre-operative or immediate post-operative measurements (66.9° vs. 55.2° p = 0.03). However, at final follow-up, the post-operative thoracic kyphosis had decreased over time in those that developed a subsequent sagittal deformity (24.2°) whereas it increased in those that did not (44.7°, p = 0.008). This decrease in thoracic kyphosis throughout the instrumented levels, resulted in a greater lordotic imbalance (30.4° vs. 5.6°, p = 0.001) throughout the instrumented levels in the group that developed the subsequent cervical or pelvic sagittal deformities. In conclusion, sagittal plane deformities commonly develop outside the instrumented levels in children with SMA type 2 following posterior spinal instrumentation and may be the result of lordotic imbalance that occurs through continued anterior growth following posterior instrumentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8394982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83949822021-08-28 Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation Halanski, Matthew A. Hanna, Rewais Bernatz, James Twedt, Max Sund, Sarah Patterson, Karen Noonan, Kenneth J. Schultz, Meredith Schroth, Mary K. Sharafinski, Mark Hasley, Brian P. Children (Basel) Article This is a retrospective radiographic review to assess post-operative sagittal plane deformities in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy type 2 that had been treated with posterior spinal instrumentation. Thirty-two patients with a history of either spinal fusion (N = 20) or growing rods (N = 12) were identified with an average of 7.6 (2.1–16.6) years post-operative follow-up. Forty percent (13/32) of the patients were identified as having obvious “tucked chin” (N = 4), “tipped trunk” (N = 9), or both (N = 3). Sacral incidence was the only parameter that was statistically significant change between pre-operative or immediate post-operative measurements (66.9° vs. 55.2° p = 0.03). However, at final follow-up, the post-operative thoracic kyphosis had decreased over time in those that developed a subsequent sagittal deformity (24.2°) whereas it increased in those that did not (44.7°, p = 0.008). This decrease in thoracic kyphosis throughout the instrumented levels, resulted in a greater lordotic imbalance (30.4° vs. 5.6°, p = 0.001) throughout the instrumented levels in the group that developed the subsequent cervical or pelvic sagittal deformities. In conclusion, sagittal plane deformities commonly develop outside the instrumented levels in children with SMA type 2 following posterior spinal instrumentation and may be the result of lordotic imbalance that occurs through continued anterior growth following posterior instrumentation. MDPI 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8394982/ /pubmed/34438594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8080703 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Halanski, Matthew A.
Hanna, Rewais
Bernatz, James
Twedt, Max
Sund, Sarah
Patterson, Karen
Noonan, Kenneth J.
Schultz, Meredith
Schroth, Mary K.
Sharafinski, Mark
Hasley, Brian P.
Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation
title Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation
title_full Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation
title_fullStr Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation
title_full_unstemmed Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation
title_short Sagittal Plane Deformities in Children with SMA2 following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation
title_sort sagittal plane deformities in children with sma2 following posterior spinal instrumentation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34438594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8080703
work_keys_str_mv AT halanskimatthewa sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation
AT hannarewais sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation
AT bernatzjames sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation
AT twedtmax sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation
AT sundsarah sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation
AT pattersonkaren sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation
AT noonankennethj sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation
AT schultzmeredith sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation
AT schrothmaryk sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation
AT sharafinskimark sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation
AT hasleybrianp sagittalplanedeformitiesinchildrenwithsma2followingposteriorspinalinstrumentation