Cargando…

Osseointegration of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces. A Histological and Histomorphometric Study in the Rabbit

Titanium surface is an important factor in achieving osseointegration during the early wound healing of dental implants in alveolar bone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sandblasted-etched surface implants to investigate the osseointegration. In the present study, we used two different typ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio, Ortiz-Garcia, Iván, Jiménez-Guerra, Alvaro, Núñez-Márquez, Enrique, Moreno-Muñoz, Jesús, Rondón-Romero, José Luis, Cabanillas-Balsera, Daniel, Gil, Javier, Muñoz-Guzón, Fernando, Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168507
_version_ 1783744112753639424
author Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
Ortiz-Garcia, Iván
Jiménez-Guerra, Alvaro
Núñez-Márquez, Enrique
Moreno-Muñoz, Jesús
Rondón-Romero, José Luis
Cabanillas-Balsera, Daniel
Gil, Javier
Muñoz-Guzón, Fernando
Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
author_facet Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
Ortiz-Garcia, Iván
Jiménez-Guerra, Alvaro
Núñez-Márquez, Enrique
Moreno-Muñoz, Jesús
Rondón-Romero, José Luis
Cabanillas-Balsera, Daniel
Gil, Javier
Muñoz-Guzón, Fernando
Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
author_sort Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
collection PubMed
description Titanium surface is an important factor in achieving osseointegration during the early wound healing of dental implants in alveolar bone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sandblasted-etched surface implants to investigate the osseointegration. In the present study, we used two different types of sandblasted-etched surface implants, an SLA™ surface and a Nanoblast Plus™ surface. Roughness and chemical composition were evaluated by a white light interferometer microscope and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. The SLA™ surface exhibited the higher values (Ra 3.05 μm) of rugosity compared to the Nanoblast Plus™ surface (Ra 1.78 μm). Both types of implants were inserted in the femoral condyles of ten New Zealand white rabbits. After 12 weeks, histological and histomorphometric analysis was performed. All the implants were osseointegrated and no signs of infection were observed. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the bone–implant contact % (BIC) ratio was similar around the SLA™ implants (63.74 ± 13.61) than around the Nanoblast Plus™ implants (62.83 ± 9.91). Both implant surfaces demonstrated a favorable bone response, confirming the relevance of the sandblasted-etched surface on implant osseointegration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8395172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83951722021-08-28 Osseointegration of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces. A Histological and Histomorphometric Study in the Rabbit Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio Ortiz-Garcia, Iván Jiménez-Guerra, Alvaro Núñez-Márquez, Enrique Moreno-Muñoz, Jesús Rondón-Romero, José Luis Cabanillas-Balsera, Daniel Gil, Javier Muñoz-Guzón, Fernando Monsalve-Guil, Loreto Int J Mol Sci Article Titanium surface is an important factor in achieving osseointegration during the early wound healing of dental implants in alveolar bone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sandblasted-etched surface implants to investigate the osseointegration. In the present study, we used two different types of sandblasted-etched surface implants, an SLA™ surface and a Nanoblast Plus™ surface. Roughness and chemical composition were evaluated by a white light interferometer microscope and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. The SLA™ surface exhibited the higher values (Ra 3.05 μm) of rugosity compared to the Nanoblast Plus™ surface (Ra 1.78 μm). Both types of implants were inserted in the femoral condyles of ten New Zealand white rabbits. After 12 weeks, histological and histomorphometric analysis was performed. All the implants were osseointegrated and no signs of infection were observed. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the bone–implant contact % (BIC) ratio was similar around the SLA™ implants (63.74 ± 13.61) than around the Nanoblast Plus™ implants (62.83 ± 9.91). Both implant surfaces demonstrated a favorable bone response, confirming the relevance of the sandblasted-etched surface on implant osseointegration. MDPI 2021-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8395172/ /pubmed/34445213 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168507 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
Ortiz-Garcia, Iván
Jiménez-Guerra, Alvaro
Núñez-Márquez, Enrique
Moreno-Muñoz, Jesús
Rondón-Romero, José Luis
Cabanillas-Balsera, Daniel
Gil, Javier
Muñoz-Guzón, Fernando
Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
Osseointegration of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces. A Histological and Histomorphometric Study in the Rabbit
title Osseointegration of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces. A Histological and Histomorphometric Study in the Rabbit
title_full Osseointegration of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces. A Histological and Histomorphometric Study in the Rabbit
title_fullStr Osseointegration of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces. A Histological and Histomorphometric Study in the Rabbit
title_full_unstemmed Osseointegration of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces. A Histological and Histomorphometric Study in the Rabbit
title_short Osseointegration of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces. A Histological and Histomorphometric Study in the Rabbit
title_sort osseointegration of sandblasted and acid-etched implant surfaces. a histological and histomorphometric study in the rabbit
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445213
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168507
work_keys_str_mv AT velascoortegaeugenio osseointegrationofsandblastedandacidetchedimplantsurfacesahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyintherabbit
AT ortizgarciaivan osseointegrationofsandblastedandacidetchedimplantsurfacesahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyintherabbit
AT jimenezguerraalvaro osseointegrationofsandblastedandacidetchedimplantsurfacesahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyintherabbit
AT nunezmarquezenrique osseointegrationofsandblastedandacidetchedimplantsurfacesahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyintherabbit
AT morenomunozjesus osseointegrationofsandblastedandacidetchedimplantsurfacesahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyintherabbit
AT rondonromerojoseluis osseointegrationofsandblastedandacidetchedimplantsurfacesahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyintherabbit
AT cabanillasbalseradaniel osseointegrationofsandblastedandacidetchedimplantsurfacesahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyintherabbit
AT giljavier osseointegrationofsandblastedandacidetchedimplantsurfacesahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyintherabbit
AT munozguzonfernando osseointegrationofsandblastedandacidetchedimplantsurfacesahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyintherabbit
AT monsalveguilloreto osseointegrationofsandblastedandacidetchedimplantsurfacesahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyintherabbit