Cargando…

Organising polypharmacy: unpacking medicines, unpacking meanings—an ethnographic study

OBJECTIVES: We explore how older patients affected by polypharmacy manage the ‘hidden work’ of organising their medicines, how they make sense of this work and integrate it into their lives. DESIGN AND SETTING: Ethnographic study observing patients over 18–24 months in patients’ homes, general pract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swinglehurst, Deborah, Fudge, Nina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049218
_version_ 1783744134331236352
author Swinglehurst, Deborah
Fudge, Nina
author_facet Swinglehurst, Deborah
Fudge, Nina
author_sort Swinglehurst, Deborah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We explore how older patients affected by polypharmacy manage the ‘hidden work’ of organising their medicines, how they make sense of this work and integrate it into their lives. DESIGN AND SETTING: Ethnographic study observing patients over 18–24 months in patients’ homes, general practice and community pharmacy, in England, UK. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Ethnographic case study including longitudinal follow-up of 24 patients aged 65 or older and prescribed ten or more items of medication. Our dataset includes: 562 hours of ethnographic observation across patients homes, community pharmacies and general practices; 47 audio-recorded interviews with patients about their lives and medicines practices; cultural probes (photographs, body maps, diaries and imagined ‘wishful thinking’ conversations); fieldnotes from regular home visits; telephone calls, and observation/video-recording of healthcare encounters. We apply a ‘practice theory’ lens to our analysis, illuminating what is being accomplished, why and by whom. RESULTS: All patients had developed strategies and routines for organising medicines into their lives, negotiating medicine taking to enable acceptable adherence and make their medicines manageable. Strategies adopted by patients often involved the use of ‘do-it-yourself’ dosette boxes. This required careful ‘organising’ work similar to that done by pharmacy staff preparing multicompartment compliance aids (MCCAs). Patients incorporated a range of approaches to manage supplies and flex their regimens to align with personal values and priorities. Practices of organising medicines are effortful, creative and often highly collaborative. Patients strive for adherence, but their organisational efforts privilege ‘living with medicines’ over taking medicines strictly ‘as prescribed’. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy demands careful organising. The burden of organising polypharmacy always falls somewhere, whether undertaken by pharmacists as they prepare MCCAs or by patients at home. Greater appreciation among prescribers of the nature and complexity of this work may provide a useful point of departure for tackling the key issue that sustains it: polypharmacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8395269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83952692021-09-14 Organising polypharmacy: unpacking medicines, unpacking meanings—an ethnographic study Swinglehurst, Deborah Fudge, Nina BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: We explore how older patients affected by polypharmacy manage the ‘hidden work’ of organising their medicines, how they make sense of this work and integrate it into their lives. DESIGN AND SETTING: Ethnographic study observing patients over 18–24 months in patients’ homes, general practice and community pharmacy, in England, UK. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Ethnographic case study including longitudinal follow-up of 24 patients aged 65 or older and prescribed ten or more items of medication. Our dataset includes: 562 hours of ethnographic observation across patients homes, community pharmacies and general practices; 47 audio-recorded interviews with patients about their lives and medicines practices; cultural probes (photographs, body maps, diaries and imagined ‘wishful thinking’ conversations); fieldnotes from regular home visits; telephone calls, and observation/video-recording of healthcare encounters. We apply a ‘practice theory’ lens to our analysis, illuminating what is being accomplished, why and by whom. RESULTS: All patients had developed strategies and routines for organising medicines into their lives, negotiating medicine taking to enable acceptable adherence and make their medicines manageable. Strategies adopted by patients often involved the use of ‘do-it-yourself’ dosette boxes. This required careful ‘organising’ work similar to that done by pharmacy staff preparing multicompartment compliance aids (MCCAs). Patients incorporated a range of approaches to manage supplies and flex their regimens to align with personal values and priorities. Practices of organising medicines are effortful, creative and often highly collaborative. Patients strive for adherence, but their organisational efforts privilege ‘living with medicines’ over taking medicines strictly ‘as prescribed’. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy demands careful organising. The burden of organising polypharmacy always falls somewhere, whether undertaken by pharmacists as they prepare MCCAs or by patients at home. Greater appreciation among prescribers of the nature and complexity of this work may provide a useful point of departure for tackling the key issue that sustains it: polypharmacy. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8395269/ /pubmed/34446490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049218 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Swinglehurst, Deborah
Fudge, Nina
Organising polypharmacy: unpacking medicines, unpacking meanings—an ethnographic study
title Organising polypharmacy: unpacking medicines, unpacking meanings—an ethnographic study
title_full Organising polypharmacy: unpacking medicines, unpacking meanings—an ethnographic study
title_fullStr Organising polypharmacy: unpacking medicines, unpacking meanings—an ethnographic study
title_full_unstemmed Organising polypharmacy: unpacking medicines, unpacking meanings—an ethnographic study
title_short Organising polypharmacy: unpacking medicines, unpacking meanings—an ethnographic study
title_sort organising polypharmacy: unpacking medicines, unpacking meanings—an ethnographic study
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049218
work_keys_str_mv AT swinglehurstdeborah organisingpolypharmacyunpackingmedicinesunpackingmeaningsanethnographicstudy
AT fudgenina organisingpolypharmacyunpackingmedicinesunpackingmeaningsanethnographicstudy