Cargando…
Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva
The rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 is critical for the prevention of disease outbreaks. Antigen tests such as immunochromatographic assay (ICA) and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) can yield results more quickly than PCR. We evaluated the performance of ICA and CLEIA using 34 frozen PCR-po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/idr13030069 |
_version_ | 1783744263996047360 |
---|---|
author | Yokota, Isao Sakurazawa, Takayo Sugita, Junichi Iwasaki, Sumio Yasuda, Keiko Yamashita, Naoki Fujisawa, Shinichi Nishida, Mutsumi Konno, Satoshi Teshima, Takanori |
author_facet | Yokota, Isao Sakurazawa, Takayo Sugita, Junichi Iwasaki, Sumio Yasuda, Keiko Yamashita, Naoki Fujisawa, Shinichi Nishida, Mutsumi Konno, Satoshi Teshima, Takanori |
author_sort | Yokota, Isao |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 is critical for the prevention of disease outbreaks. Antigen tests such as immunochromatographic assay (ICA) and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) can yield results more quickly than PCR. We evaluated the performance of ICA and CLEIA using 34 frozen PCR-positive (17 saliva samples and 17 nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS]) and 309 PCR-negative samples. ICA detected SARS-CoV-2 in only 14 (41%) samples, with positivity rates of 24% in saliva and 59% in NPS. Notably, ICA detected SARS-CoV-2 in 5 of 6 samples collected within 4 days after symptom onset. CLEIA detected SARS-CoV-2 in 31 (91%) samples, with a positivity of 82% in saliva and 100% in NPS. These results suggest that the use of ICA should be limited to an earlier time after symptom onset and CLEIA is more sensitive and can be used in situations where quick results are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8395849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83958492021-08-28 Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva Yokota, Isao Sakurazawa, Takayo Sugita, Junichi Iwasaki, Sumio Yasuda, Keiko Yamashita, Naoki Fujisawa, Shinichi Nishida, Mutsumi Konno, Satoshi Teshima, Takanori Infect Dis Rep Brief Report The rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 is critical for the prevention of disease outbreaks. Antigen tests such as immunochromatographic assay (ICA) and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) can yield results more quickly than PCR. We evaluated the performance of ICA and CLEIA using 34 frozen PCR-positive (17 saliva samples and 17 nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS]) and 309 PCR-negative samples. ICA detected SARS-CoV-2 in only 14 (41%) samples, with positivity rates of 24% in saliva and 59% in NPS. Notably, ICA detected SARS-CoV-2 in 5 of 6 samples collected within 4 days after symptom onset. CLEIA detected SARS-CoV-2 in 31 (91%) samples, with a positivity of 82% in saliva and 100% in NPS. These results suggest that the use of ICA should be limited to an earlier time after symptom onset and CLEIA is more sensitive and can be used in situations where quick results are required. MDPI 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8395849/ /pubmed/34449650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/idr13030069 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Yokota, Isao Sakurazawa, Takayo Sugita, Junichi Iwasaki, Sumio Yasuda, Keiko Yamashita, Naoki Fujisawa, Shinichi Nishida, Mutsumi Konno, Satoshi Teshima, Takanori Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva |
title | Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva |
title_full | Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva |
title_fullStr | Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva |
title_short | Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva |
title_sort | performance of qualitative and quantitative antigen tests for sars-cov-2 using saliva |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/idr13030069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yokotaisao performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva AT sakurazawatakayo performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva AT sugitajunichi performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva AT iwasakisumio performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva AT yasudakeiko performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva AT yamashitanaoki performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva AT fujisawashinichi performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva AT nishidamutsumi performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva AT konnosatoshi performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva AT teshimatakanori performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva |