Cargando…

Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva

The rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 is critical for the prevention of disease outbreaks. Antigen tests such as immunochromatographic assay (ICA) and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) can yield results more quickly than PCR. We evaluated the performance of ICA and CLEIA using 34 frozen PCR-po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yokota, Isao, Sakurazawa, Takayo, Sugita, Junichi, Iwasaki, Sumio, Yasuda, Keiko, Yamashita, Naoki, Fujisawa, Shinichi, Nishida, Mutsumi, Konno, Satoshi, Teshima, Takanori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449650
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/idr13030069
_version_ 1783744263996047360
author Yokota, Isao
Sakurazawa, Takayo
Sugita, Junichi
Iwasaki, Sumio
Yasuda, Keiko
Yamashita, Naoki
Fujisawa, Shinichi
Nishida, Mutsumi
Konno, Satoshi
Teshima, Takanori
author_facet Yokota, Isao
Sakurazawa, Takayo
Sugita, Junichi
Iwasaki, Sumio
Yasuda, Keiko
Yamashita, Naoki
Fujisawa, Shinichi
Nishida, Mutsumi
Konno, Satoshi
Teshima, Takanori
author_sort Yokota, Isao
collection PubMed
description The rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 is critical for the prevention of disease outbreaks. Antigen tests such as immunochromatographic assay (ICA) and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) can yield results more quickly than PCR. We evaluated the performance of ICA and CLEIA using 34 frozen PCR-positive (17 saliva samples and 17 nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS]) and 309 PCR-negative samples. ICA detected SARS-CoV-2 in only 14 (41%) samples, with positivity rates of 24% in saliva and 59% in NPS. Notably, ICA detected SARS-CoV-2 in 5 of 6 samples collected within 4 days after symptom onset. CLEIA detected SARS-CoV-2 in 31 (91%) samples, with a positivity of 82% in saliva and 100% in NPS. These results suggest that the use of ICA should be limited to an earlier time after symptom onset and CLEIA is more sensitive and can be used in situations where quick results are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8395849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83958492021-08-28 Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva Yokota, Isao Sakurazawa, Takayo Sugita, Junichi Iwasaki, Sumio Yasuda, Keiko Yamashita, Naoki Fujisawa, Shinichi Nishida, Mutsumi Konno, Satoshi Teshima, Takanori Infect Dis Rep Brief Report The rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 is critical for the prevention of disease outbreaks. Antigen tests such as immunochromatographic assay (ICA) and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) can yield results more quickly than PCR. We evaluated the performance of ICA and CLEIA using 34 frozen PCR-positive (17 saliva samples and 17 nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS]) and 309 PCR-negative samples. ICA detected SARS-CoV-2 in only 14 (41%) samples, with positivity rates of 24% in saliva and 59% in NPS. Notably, ICA detected SARS-CoV-2 in 5 of 6 samples collected within 4 days after symptom onset. CLEIA detected SARS-CoV-2 in 31 (91%) samples, with a positivity of 82% in saliva and 100% in NPS. These results suggest that the use of ICA should be limited to an earlier time after symptom onset and CLEIA is more sensitive and can be used in situations where quick results are required. MDPI 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8395849/ /pubmed/34449650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/idr13030069 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Yokota, Isao
Sakurazawa, Takayo
Sugita, Junichi
Iwasaki, Sumio
Yasuda, Keiko
Yamashita, Naoki
Fujisawa, Shinichi
Nishida, Mutsumi
Konno, Satoshi
Teshima, Takanori
Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva
title Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva
title_full Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva
title_fullStr Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva
title_short Performance of Qualitative and Quantitative Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva
title_sort performance of qualitative and quantitative antigen tests for sars-cov-2 using saliva
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8395849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449650
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/idr13030069
work_keys_str_mv AT yokotaisao performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva
AT sakurazawatakayo performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva
AT sugitajunichi performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva
AT iwasakisumio performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva
AT yasudakeiko performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva
AT yamashitanaoki performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva
AT fujisawashinichi performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva
AT nishidamutsumi performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva
AT konnosatoshi performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva
AT teshimatakanori performanceofqualitativeandquantitativeantigentestsforsarscov2usingsaliva