Cargando…
Qualitative Individual Differences are Useful, but Reliability Should be Assessed and Not Assumed
Rouder and Haaf (2021) propose that studying qualitative individual differences would be a useful tool for researchers. I agree with their central message. I use this commentary to highlight examples from the literature where similar questions have been asked, and how researchers have addressed them...
Autor principal: | Hedge, Craig |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8396121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514319 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.169 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Are there Reliable Qualitative Individual Differences in Cognition? Probably Not
por: von Bastian, Claudia C.
Publicado: (2021) -
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences
por: Hedge, Craig, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Should we assume that hypothermia is a dysfunction in sepsis?
por: Steiner, Alexandre A., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Assuming the Challenge of Developing Research Projects in Occupational Health Nursing
por: González-Caballero, Javier
Publicado: (2023) -
Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function?
por: Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio, et al.
Publicado: (2020)