Cargando…
Are There Reliable Qualitative Individual Difference in Cognition?
In this paper we propose a new set of questions that focus on the direction of effects. In almost all studies the direction is important. For example, in a Stroop task we expect responses to incongruent items to be slower than those to congruent ones, and this direction implies one theoretical expla...
Autores principales: | Rouder, Jeffrey N., Haaf, Julia M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8396124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514317 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.131 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Are there Reliable Qualitative Individual Differences in Cognition? Probably Not
por: von Bastian, Claudia C.
Publicado: (2021) -
The truth revisited: Bayesian analysis of individual differences in the truth effect
por: Schnuerch, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Revisiting the remember–know task: Replications of Gardiner and Java (1990)
por: Haaf, Julia M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences
por: Hedge, Craig, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Qualitative Individual Differences are Useful, but Reliability Should be Assessed and Not Assumed
por: Hedge, Craig
Publicado: (2021)