Cargando…
Comparison of Histological Sample Volumes among Various Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Needles
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) enables easy and accurate pathological assessment. Here, we compared and assessed the area of samples on glass slides for three needle types: a 19-gauge Franseen needle (Acquire, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA), a 22-gauge Franseen needle...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8396954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163560 |
_version_ | 1783744494063058944 |
---|---|
author | Takahashi, Kosuke Yasuda, Ichiro Hanaoka, Tatsuyuki Hayashi, Yuka Motoo, Iori Kajiura, Shinya Ando, Takayuki Fujinami, Haruka Tajiri, Kazuto Imura, Johji Ozawa, Eisuke Miuma, Satoshi Miyaaki, Hisamitsu Nakao, Kazuhiko |
author_facet | Takahashi, Kosuke Yasuda, Ichiro Hanaoka, Tatsuyuki Hayashi, Yuka Motoo, Iori Kajiura, Shinya Ando, Takayuki Fujinami, Haruka Tajiri, Kazuto Imura, Johji Ozawa, Eisuke Miuma, Satoshi Miyaaki, Hisamitsu Nakao, Kazuhiko |
author_sort | Takahashi, Kosuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) enables easy and accurate pathological assessment. Here, we compared and assessed the area of samples on glass slides for three needle types: a 19-gauge Franseen needle (Acquire, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA), a 22-gauge Franseen needle, and a 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle (EZ Shot 3 Plus; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Among patients with suspected pancreatic cancer, with a ≥20 mm tumor located in the pancreatic body and tail, and who underwent EUS-FNA or FNB between June 2018 and March 2020, 10 were randomly selected to test each needle. The areas of histological tissue and blood clot samples were measured using the BZ-X800 imaging software (Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan). Baseline patient characteristics and pathological sample data showed no significant differences among the needles. The 19-gauge Franseen needle obtained significantly more histological tissue samples than the 19-gauge conventional needle (p = 0.010) and 22-gauge Franseen needle (p = 0.008). Conversely, there was no significant difference between the 19-gauge conventional needle and 22-gauge Franseen needle (p = 0.838) in this regard. The 19-gauge Franseen needle could collect more samples than the other needles, contributing to giving a more precise pathological diagnosis and more information, including genomic profiling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8396954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83969542021-08-28 Comparison of Histological Sample Volumes among Various Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Needles Takahashi, Kosuke Yasuda, Ichiro Hanaoka, Tatsuyuki Hayashi, Yuka Motoo, Iori Kajiura, Shinya Ando, Takayuki Fujinami, Haruka Tajiri, Kazuto Imura, Johji Ozawa, Eisuke Miuma, Satoshi Miyaaki, Hisamitsu Nakao, Kazuhiko J Clin Med Article Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) enables easy and accurate pathological assessment. Here, we compared and assessed the area of samples on glass slides for three needle types: a 19-gauge Franseen needle (Acquire, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA), a 22-gauge Franseen needle, and a 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle (EZ Shot 3 Plus; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Among patients with suspected pancreatic cancer, with a ≥20 mm tumor located in the pancreatic body and tail, and who underwent EUS-FNA or FNB between June 2018 and March 2020, 10 were randomly selected to test each needle. The areas of histological tissue and blood clot samples were measured using the BZ-X800 imaging software (Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan). Baseline patient characteristics and pathological sample data showed no significant differences among the needles. The 19-gauge Franseen needle obtained significantly more histological tissue samples than the 19-gauge conventional needle (p = 0.010) and 22-gauge Franseen needle (p = 0.008). Conversely, there was no significant difference between the 19-gauge conventional needle and 22-gauge Franseen needle (p = 0.838) in this regard. The 19-gauge Franseen needle could collect more samples than the other needles, contributing to giving a more precise pathological diagnosis and more information, including genomic profiling. MDPI 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8396954/ /pubmed/34441856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163560 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Takahashi, Kosuke Yasuda, Ichiro Hanaoka, Tatsuyuki Hayashi, Yuka Motoo, Iori Kajiura, Shinya Ando, Takayuki Fujinami, Haruka Tajiri, Kazuto Imura, Johji Ozawa, Eisuke Miuma, Satoshi Miyaaki, Hisamitsu Nakao, Kazuhiko Comparison of Histological Sample Volumes among Various Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Needles |
title | Comparison of Histological Sample Volumes among Various Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Needles |
title_full | Comparison of Histological Sample Volumes among Various Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Needles |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Histological Sample Volumes among Various Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Needles |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Histological Sample Volumes among Various Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Needles |
title_short | Comparison of Histological Sample Volumes among Various Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Needles |
title_sort | comparison of histological sample volumes among various endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy needles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8396954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takahashikosuke comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT yasudaichiro comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT hanaokatatsuyuki comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT hayashiyuka comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT motooiori comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT kajiurashinya comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT andotakayuki comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT fujinamiharuka comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT tajirikazuto comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT imurajohji comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT ozawaeisuke comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT miumasatoshi comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT miyaakihisamitsu comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles AT nakaokazuhiko comparisonofhistologicalsamplevolumesamongvariousendoscopicultrasoundguidedbiopsyneedles |