Cargando…

Low-Intensity and Short-Duration Continuous Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Intervention Does Not Prime the Corticospinal and Spinal Reflex Pathways in Able-Bodied Subjects

Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been utilized in applications for improving upper-limb sensory and motor function in patients with spinal cord injury. Although therapeutic effects of continuous cervical tSCS interventions have been reported, neurophysiological mechanisms r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sasaki, Atsushi, de Freitas, Roberto M., Sayenko, Dimitry G., Masugi, Yohei, Nomura, Taishin, Nakazawa, Kimitaka, Milosevic, Matija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441927
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163633
_version_ 1783744520775532544
author Sasaki, Atsushi
de Freitas, Roberto M.
Sayenko, Dimitry G.
Masugi, Yohei
Nomura, Taishin
Nakazawa, Kimitaka
Milosevic, Matija
author_facet Sasaki, Atsushi
de Freitas, Roberto M.
Sayenko, Dimitry G.
Masugi, Yohei
Nomura, Taishin
Nakazawa, Kimitaka
Milosevic, Matija
author_sort Sasaki, Atsushi
collection PubMed
description Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been utilized in applications for improving upper-limb sensory and motor function in patients with spinal cord injury. Although therapeutic effects of continuous cervical tSCS interventions have been reported, neurophysiological mechanisms remain largely unexplored. Specifically, it is not clear whether sub-threshold intensity and 10-min duration continuous cervical tSCS intervention can affect the central nervous system excitability. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate effects of sub-motor-threshold 10-min continuous cervical tSCS applied at rest on the corticospinal and spinal reflex circuit in ten able-bodied individuals. Neurophysiological assessments were conducted to investigate (1) corticospinal excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation applied on the primary motor cortex to evoke motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and (2) spinal reflex excitability via single-pulse tSCS applied at the cervical level to evoke posterior root muscle (PRM) reflexes. Measurements were recorded from multiple upper-limb muscles before, during, and after the intervention. Our results showed that low-intensity and short-duration continuous cervical tSCS intervention applied at rest did not significantly affect corticospinal and spinal reflex excitability. The stimulation duration and/or intensity, as well as other stimulating parameters selection, may therefore be critical for inducing neuromodulatory effects during cervical tSCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8397025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83970252021-08-28 Low-Intensity and Short-Duration Continuous Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Intervention Does Not Prime the Corticospinal and Spinal Reflex Pathways in Able-Bodied Subjects Sasaki, Atsushi de Freitas, Roberto M. Sayenko, Dimitry G. Masugi, Yohei Nomura, Taishin Nakazawa, Kimitaka Milosevic, Matija J Clin Med Article Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been utilized in applications for improving upper-limb sensory and motor function in patients with spinal cord injury. Although therapeutic effects of continuous cervical tSCS interventions have been reported, neurophysiological mechanisms remain largely unexplored. Specifically, it is not clear whether sub-threshold intensity and 10-min duration continuous cervical tSCS intervention can affect the central nervous system excitability. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate effects of sub-motor-threshold 10-min continuous cervical tSCS applied at rest on the corticospinal and spinal reflex circuit in ten able-bodied individuals. Neurophysiological assessments were conducted to investigate (1) corticospinal excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation applied on the primary motor cortex to evoke motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and (2) spinal reflex excitability via single-pulse tSCS applied at the cervical level to evoke posterior root muscle (PRM) reflexes. Measurements were recorded from multiple upper-limb muscles before, during, and after the intervention. Our results showed that low-intensity and short-duration continuous cervical tSCS intervention applied at rest did not significantly affect corticospinal and spinal reflex excitability. The stimulation duration and/or intensity, as well as other stimulating parameters selection, may therefore be critical for inducing neuromodulatory effects during cervical tSCS. MDPI 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8397025/ /pubmed/34441927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163633 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sasaki, Atsushi
de Freitas, Roberto M.
Sayenko, Dimitry G.
Masugi, Yohei
Nomura, Taishin
Nakazawa, Kimitaka
Milosevic, Matija
Low-Intensity and Short-Duration Continuous Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Intervention Does Not Prime the Corticospinal and Spinal Reflex Pathways in Able-Bodied Subjects
title Low-Intensity and Short-Duration Continuous Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Intervention Does Not Prime the Corticospinal and Spinal Reflex Pathways in Able-Bodied Subjects
title_full Low-Intensity and Short-Duration Continuous Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Intervention Does Not Prime the Corticospinal and Spinal Reflex Pathways in Able-Bodied Subjects
title_fullStr Low-Intensity and Short-Duration Continuous Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Intervention Does Not Prime the Corticospinal and Spinal Reflex Pathways in Able-Bodied Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Low-Intensity and Short-Duration Continuous Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Intervention Does Not Prime the Corticospinal and Spinal Reflex Pathways in Able-Bodied Subjects
title_short Low-Intensity and Short-Duration Continuous Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Intervention Does Not Prime the Corticospinal and Spinal Reflex Pathways in Able-Bodied Subjects
title_sort low-intensity and short-duration continuous cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation intervention does not prime the corticospinal and spinal reflex pathways in able-bodied subjects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441927
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163633
work_keys_str_mv AT sasakiatsushi lowintensityandshortdurationcontinuouscervicaltranscutaneousspinalcordstimulationinterventiondoesnotprimethecorticospinalandspinalreflexpathwaysinablebodiedsubjects
AT defreitasrobertom lowintensityandshortdurationcontinuouscervicaltranscutaneousspinalcordstimulationinterventiondoesnotprimethecorticospinalandspinalreflexpathwaysinablebodiedsubjects
AT sayenkodimitryg lowintensityandshortdurationcontinuouscervicaltranscutaneousspinalcordstimulationinterventiondoesnotprimethecorticospinalandspinalreflexpathwaysinablebodiedsubjects
AT masugiyohei lowintensityandshortdurationcontinuouscervicaltranscutaneousspinalcordstimulationinterventiondoesnotprimethecorticospinalandspinalreflexpathwaysinablebodiedsubjects
AT nomurataishin lowintensityandshortdurationcontinuouscervicaltranscutaneousspinalcordstimulationinterventiondoesnotprimethecorticospinalandspinalreflexpathwaysinablebodiedsubjects
AT nakazawakimitaka lowintensityandshortdurationcontinuouscervicaltranscutaneousspinalcordstimulationinterventiondoesnotprimethecorticospinalandspinalreflexpathwaysinablebodiedsubjects
AT milosevicmatija lowintensityandshortdurationcontinuouscervicaltranscutaneousspinalcordstimulationinterventiondoesnotprimethecorticospinalandspinalreflexpathwaysinablebodiedsubjects