Cargando…
Lung Nodule Evaluation Using Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy at a Veteran’s Affairs Hospital
The incidence of lung nodules has increased with improved diagnostic imaging and screening protocols. Despite improvements for diagnosing pulmonary nodules with technologies such as electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB), several limitations still exist including adequate visualization, loc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163671 |
_version_ | 1783744550776340480 |
---|---|
author | Ekeke, Chigozirim N. Vercauteren, Matthew Istvaniczdravkovic, Smiljana Semaan, Roy Dhupar, Rajeev |
author_facet | Ekeke, Chigozirim N. Vercauteren, Matthew Istvaniczdravkovic, Smiljana Semaan, Roy Dhupar, Rajeev |
author_sort | Ekeke, Chigozirim N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The incidence of lung nodules has increased with improved diagnostic imaging and screening protocols. Despite improvements for diagnosing pulmonary nodules with technologies such as electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB), several limitations still exist including adequate visualization, localization, and diagnostic yield. Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with ENB has been introduced as a method to overcome these shortcomings. We describe our initial experience in evaluating lung nodules with robotic assisted bronchoscopy. We retrospectively reviewed data on the first 25 patients that underwent robotic-assisted bronchoscopy and biopsy. We analyzed success with localization, diagnostic yield, and post procedural morbidity. Diagnostic yield was 96% (24/25) with no periprocedural morbidity. The majority of nodules were malignant or atypical (76%) and were located in the right upper lobe. Diameter ranged between 0.8–6.9 cm (median size 1–2 cm). Seventy-five percent of patients underwent subsequent treatment for cancer based on these results, with 25% having continued surveillance. Robotic assisted bronchoscopy is safe and accurate. Studies with larger numbers will allow better understanding of the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of this approach in comparison to other diagnostic tools for lung nodules. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8397153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83971532021-08-28 Lung Nodule Evaluation Using Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy at a Veteran’s Affairs Hospital Ekeke, Chigozirim N. Vercauteren, Matthew Istvaniczdravkovic, Smiljana Semaan, Roy Dhupar, Rajeev J Clin Med Article The incidence of lung nodules has increased with improved diagnostic imaging and screening protocols. Despite improvements for diagnosing pulmonary nodules with technologies such as electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB), several limitations still exist including adequate visualization, localization, and diagnostic yield. Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with ENB has been introduced as a method to overcome these shortcomings. We describe our initial experience in evaluating lung nodules with robotic assisted bronchoscopy. We retrospectively reviewed data on the first 25 patients that underwent robotic-assisted bronchoscopy and biopsy. We analyzed success with localization, diagnostic yield, and post procedural morbidity. Diagnostic yield was 96% (24/25) with no periprocedural morbidity. The majority of nodules were malignant or atypical (76%) and were located in the right upper lobe. Diameter ranged between 0.8–6.9 cm (median size 1–2 cm). Seventy-five percent of patients underwent subsequent treatment for cancer based on these results, with 25% having continued surveillance. Robotic assisted bronchoscopy is safe and accurate. Studies with larger numbers will allow better understanding of the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of this approach in comparison to other diagnostic tools for lung nodules. MDPI 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8397153/ /pubmed/34441966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163671 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ekeke, Chigozirim N. Vercauteren, Matthew Istvaniczdravkovic, Smiljana Semaan, Roy Dhupar, Rajeev Lung Nodule Evaluation Using Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy at a Veteran’s Affairs Hospital |
title | Lung Nodule Evaluation Using Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy at a Veteran’s Affairs Hospital |
title_full | Lung Nodule Evaluation Using Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy at a Veteran’s Affairs Hospital |
title_fullStr | Lung Nodule Evaluation Using Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy at a Veteran’s Affairs Hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Lung Nodule Evaluation Using Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy at a Veteran’s Affairs Hospital |
title_short | Lung Nodule Evaluation Using Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy at a Veteran’s Affairs Hospital |
title_sort | lung nodule evaluation using robotic-assisted bronchoscopy at a veteran’s affairs hospital |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ekekechigozirimn lungnoduleevaluationusingroboticassistedbronchoscopyataveteransaffairshospital AT vercauterenmatthew lungnoduleevaluationusingroboticassistedbronchoscopyataveteransaffairshospital AT istvaniczdravkovicsmiljana lungnoduleevaluationusingroboticassistedbronchoscopyataveteransaffairshospital AT semaanroy lungnoduleevaluationusingroboticassistedbronchoscopyataveteransaffairshospital AT dhuparrajeev lungnoduleevaluationusingroboticassistedbronchoscopyataveteransaffairshospital |