Cargando…

Functional and Cosmetic Outcome after Reconstruction of Isolated, Unilateral Orbital Floor Fractures (Blow-Out Fractures) with and without the Support of 3D-Printed Orbital Anatomical Models

The present study aimed to analyze if a preformed “hybrid” patient-specific orbital mesh provides a more accurate reconstruction of the orbital floor and a better functional outcome than a standardized, intraoperatively adapted titanium implant. Thirty patients who had undergone surgical reconstruct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sigron, Guido R., Barba, Marina, Chammartin, Frédérique, Msallem, Bilal, Berg, Britt-Isabelle, Thieringer, Florian M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163509
_version_ 1783744561813651456
author Sigron, Guido R.
Barba, Marina
Chammartin, Frédérique
Msallem, Bilal
Berg, Britt-Isabelle
Thieringer, Florian M.
author_facet Sigron, Guido R.
Barba, Marina
Chammartin, Frédérique
Msallem, Bilal
Berg, Britt-Isabelle
Thieringer, Florian M.
author_sort Sigron, Guido R.
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to analyze if a preformed “hybrid” patient-specific orbital mesh provides a more accurate reconstruction of the orbital floor and a better functional outcome than a standardized, intraoperatively adapted titanium implant. Thirty patients who had undergone surgical reconstruction for isolated, unilateral orbital floor fractures between May 2016 and November 2018 were included in this study. Of these patients, 13 were treated conventionally by intraoperative adjustment of a standardized titanium mesh based on assessing the fracture’s shape and extent. For the other 17 patients, an individual three-dimensional (3D) anatomical model of the orbit was fabricated with an in-house 3D-printer. This model was used as a template to create a so-called “hybrid” patient-specific titanium implant by preforming the titanium mesh before surgery. The functional and cosmetic outcome in terms of diplopia, enophthalmos, ocular motility, and sensory disturbance trended better when “hybrid” patient-specific titanium meshes were used but with statistically non-significant differences. The 3D-printed anatomical models mirroring the unaffected orbit did not delay the surgery’s timepoint. Nonetheless, it significantly reduced the surgery duration compared to the traditional method (58.9 (SD: 20.1) min versus 94.8 (SD: 33.0) min, p-value = 0.003). This study shows that using 3D-printed anatomical models as a supporting tool allows precise and less time-consuming orbital reconstructions with clinical benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8397200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83972002021-08-28 Functional and Cosmetic Outcome after Reconstruction of Isolated, Unilateral Orbital Floor Fractures (Blow-Out Fractures) with and without the Support of 3D-Printed Orbital Anatomical Models Sigron, Guido R. Barba, Marina Chammartin, Frédérique Msallem, Bilal Berg, Britt-Isabelle Thieringer, Florian M. J Clin Med Article The present study aimed to analyze if a preformed “hybrid” patient-specific orbital mesh provides a more accurate reconstruction of the orbital floor and a better functional outcome than a standardized, intraoperatively adapted titanium implant. Thirty patients who had undergone surgical reconstruction for isolated, unilateral orbital floor fractures between May 2016 and November 2018 were included in this study. Of these patients, 13 were treated conventionally by intraoperative adjustment of a standardized titanium mesh based on assessing the fracture’s shape and extent. For the other 17 patients, an individual three-dimensional (3D) anatomical model of the orbit was fabricated with an in-house 3D-printer. This model was used as a template to create a so-called “hybrid” patient-specific titanium implant by preforming the titanium mesh before surgery. The functional and cosmetic outcome in terms of diplopia, enophthalmos, ocular motility, and sensory disturbance trended better when “hybrid” patient-specific titanium meshes were used but with statistically non-significant differences. The 3D-printed anatomical models mirroring the unaffected orbit did not delay the surgery’s timepoint. Nonetheless, it significantly reduced the surgery duration compared to the traditional method (58.9 (SD: 20.1) min versus 94.8 (SD: 33.0) min, p-value = 0.003). This study shows that using 3D-printed anatomical models as a supporting tool allows precise and less time-consuming orbital reconstructions with clinical benefits. MDPI 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8397200/ /pubmed/34441806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163509 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sigron, Guido R.
Barba, Marina
Chammartin, Frédérique
Msallem, Bilal
Berg, Britt-Isabelle
Thieringer, Florian M.
Functional and Cosmetic Outcome after Reconstruction of Isolated, Unilateral Orbital Floor Fractures (Blow-Out Fractures) with and without the Support of 3D-Printed Orbital Anatomical Models
title Functional and Cosmetic Outcome after Reconstruction of Isolated, Unilateral Orbital Floor Fractures (Blow-Out Fractures) with and without the Support of 3D-Printed Orbital Anatomical Models
title_full Functional and Cosmetic Outcome after Reconstruction of Isolated, Unilateral Orbital Floor Fractures (Blow-Out Fractures) with and without the Support of 3D-Printed Orbital Anatomical Models
title_fullStr Functional and Cosmetic Outcome after Reconstruction of Isolated, Unilateral Orbital Floor Fractures (Blow-Out Fractures) with and without the Support of 3D-Printed Orbital Anatomical Models
title_full_unstemmed Functional and Cosmetic Outcome after Reconstruction of Isolated, Unilateral Orbital Floor Fractures (Blow-Out Fractures) with and without the Support of 3D-Printed Orbital Anatomical Models
title_short Functional and Cosmetic Outcome after Reconstruction of Isolated, Unilateral Orbital Floor Fractures (Blow-Out Fractures) with and without the Support of 3D-Printed Orbital Anatomical Models
title_sort functional and cosmetic outcome after reconstruction of isolated, unilateral orbital floor fractures (blow-out fractures) with and without the support of 3d-printed orbital anatomical models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163509
work_keys_str_mv AT sigronguidor functionalandcosmeticoutcomeafterreconstructionofisolatedunilateralorbitalfloorfracturesblowoutfractureswithandwithoutthesupportof3dprintedorbitalanatomicalmodels
AT barbamarina functionalandcosmeticoutcomeafterreconstructionofisolatedunilateralorbitalfloorfracturesblowoutfractureswithandwithoutthesupportof3dprintedorbitalanatomicalmodels
AT chammartinfrederique functionalandcosmeticoutcomeafterreconstructionofisolatedunilateralorbitalfloorfracturesblowoutfractureswithandwithoutthesupportof3dprintedorbitalanatomicalmodels
AT msallembilal functionalandcosmeticoutcomeafterreconstructionofisolatedunilateralorbitalfloorfracturesblowoutfractureswithandwithoutthesupportof3dprintedorbitalanatomicalmodels
AT bergbrittisabelle functionalandcosmeticoutcomeafterreconstructionofisolatedunilateralorbitalfloorfracturesblowoutfractureswithandwithoutthesupportof3dprintedorbitalanatomicalmodels
AT thieringerflorianm functionalandcosmeticoutcomeafterreconstructionofisolatedunilateralorbitalfloorfracturesblowoutfractureswithandwithoutthesupportof3dprintedorbitalanatomicalmodels