Cargando…

Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients who failed standard treatment regimens. METHODS: Totally, 76 eligible...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Fei, Zheng, Jiaping, Luo, Jun, Zhang, Zhewei, Shao, Guoliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34302208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1
_version_ 1783744655765012480
author Cao, Fei
Zheng, Jiaping
Luo, Jun
Zhang, Zhewei
Shao, Guoliang
author_facet Cao, Fei
Zheng, Jiaping
Luo, Jun
Zhang, Zhewei
Shao, Guoliang
author_sort Cao, Fei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients who failed standard treatment regimens. METHODS: Totally, 76 eligible CRLM patients were analyzed, among which 42 patients received regorafenib monotherapy (as regorafenib group) and 34 patients received regorafenib plus DEB-TACE (as regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group). RESULTS: Objective response rate (35.3% versus 7.1%, P = 0.002) and disease control rate (76.5% versus 47.6%, P = 0.011) were both increased in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group; meanwhile, negative conversion rate of carcinoembryonic antigen (66.7% versus 28.6%, P = 0.008) after treatment was elevated in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group. Notably, progression-free survival (PFS) (median value: 7.6 versus 4.1 months, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median value: 15.7 versus 9.2 months, P < 0.001) were both higher in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group. Furthermore, liver function indexes (alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, and cholinesterase levels) after treatment were all similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In addition, the occurrences of upper abdominal distending pain (P < 0.001), nausea and vomiting (P = 0.002) and fever (P = 0.002) were higher in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group, while the majority of these adverse events were mild and tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib plus DEB-TACE is superior to regorafenib monotherapy regarding treatment response, PFS and OS, while induces tolerable post-embolization syndrome in CRLM patients who fail standard treatment regimens. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8397621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83976212021-09-14 Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens Cao, Fei Zheng, Jiaping Luo, Jun Zhang, Zhewei Shao, Guoliang J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Cancer Research OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients who failed standard treatment regimens. METHODS: Totally, 76 eligible CRLM patients were analyzed, among which 42 patients received regorafenib monotherapy (as regorafenib group) and 34 patients received regorafenib plus DEB-TACE (as regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group). RESULTS: Objective response rate (35.3% versus 7.1%, P = 0.002) and disease control rate (76.5% versus 47.6%, P = 0.011) were both increased in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group; meanwhile, negative conversion rate of carcinoembryonic antigen (66.7% versus 28.6%, P = 0.008) after treatment was elevated in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group. Notably, progression-free survival (PFS) (median value: 7.6 versus 4.1 months, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median value: 15.7 versus 9.2 months, P < 0.001) were both higher in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group. Furthermore, liver function indexes (alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, and cholinesterase levels) after treatment were all similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In addition, the occurrences of upper abdominal distending pain (P < 0.001), nausea and vomiting (P = 0.002) and fever (P = 0.002) were higher in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group, while the majority of these adverse events were mild and tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib plus DEB-TACE is superior to regorafenib monotherapy regarding treatment response, PFS and OS, while induces tolerable post-embolization syndrome in CRLM patients who fail standard treatment regimens. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8397621/ /pubmed/34302208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article – Cancer Research
Cao, Fei
Zheng, Jiaping
Luo, Jun
Zhang, Zhewei
Shao, Guoliang
Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens
title Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens
title_full Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens
title_fullStr Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens
title_full_unstemmed Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens
title_short Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens
title_sort treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens
topic Original Article – Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34302208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1
work_keys_str_mv AT caofei treatmentefficacyandsafetyofregorafenibplusdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationversusregorafenibmonotherapyincolorectalcancerlivermetastasispatientswhofailstandardtreatmentregimens
AT zhengjiaping treatmentefficacyandsafetyofregorafenibplusdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationversusregorafenibmonotherapyincolorectalcancerlivermetastasispatientswhofailstandardtreatmentregimens
AT luojun treatmentefficacyandsafetyofregorafenibplusdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationversusregorafenibmonotherapyincolorectalcancerlivermetastasispatientswhofailstandardtreatmentregimens
AT zhangzhewei treatmentefficacyandsafetyofregorafenibplusdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationversusregorafenibmonotherapyincolorectalcancerlivermetastasispatientswhofailstandardtreatmentregimens
AT shaoguoliang treatmentefficacyandsafetyofregorafenibplusdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationversusregorafenibmonotherapyincolorectalcancerlivermetastasispatientswhofailstandardtreatmentregimens