Cargando…
Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients who failed standard treatment regimens. METHODS: Totally, 76 eligible...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34302208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1 |
_version_ | 1783744655765012480 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Fei Zheng, Jiaping Luo, Jun Zhang, Zhewei Shao, Guoliang |
author_facet | Cao, Fei Zheng, Jiaping Luo, Jun Zhang, Zhewei Shao, Guoliang |
author_sort | Cao, Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients who failed standard treatment regimens. METHODS: Totally, 76 eligible CRLM patients were analyzed, among which 42 patients received regorafenib monotherapy (as regorafenib group) and 34 patients received regorafenib plus DEB-TACE (as regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group). RESULTS: Objective response rate (35.3% versus 7.1%, P = 0.002) and disease control rate (76.5% versus 47.6%, P = 0.011) were both increased in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group; meanwhile, negative conversion rate of carcinoembryonic antigen (66.7% versus 28.6%, P = 0.008) after treatment was elevated in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group. Notably, progression-free survival (PFS) (median value: 7.6 versus 4.1 months, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median value: 15.7 versus 9.2 months, P < 0.001) were both higher in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group. Furthermore, liver function indexes (alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, and cholinesterase levels) after treatment were all similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In addition, the occurrences of upper abdominal distending pain (P < 0.001), nausea and vomiting (P = 0.002) and fever (P = 0.002) were higher in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group, while the majority of these adverse events were mild and tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib plus DEB-TACE is superior to regorafenib monotherapy regarding treatment response, PFS and OS, while induces tolerable post-embolization syndrome in CRLM patients who fail standard treatment regimens. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8397621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83976212021-09-14 Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens Cao, Fei Zheng, Jiaping Luo, Jun Zhang, Zhewei Shao, Guoliang J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Cancer Research OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients who failed standard treatment regimens. METHODS: Totally, 76 eligible CRLM patients were analyzed, among which 42 patients received regorafenib monotherapy (as regorafenib group) and 34 patients received regorafenib plus DEB-TACE (as regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group). RESULTS: Objective response rate (35.3% versus 7.1%, P = 0.002) and disease control rate (76.5% versus 47.6%, P = 0.011) were both increased in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group; meanwhile, negative conversion rate of carcinoembryonic antigen (66.7% versus 28.6%, P = 0.008) after treatment was elevated in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group. Notably, progression-free survival (PFS) (median value: 7.6 versus 4.1 months, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median value: 15.7 versus 9.2 months, P < 0.001) were both higher in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group. Furthermore, liver function indexes (alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, and cholinesterase levels) after treatment were all similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In addition, the occurrences of upper abdominal distending pain (P < 0.001), nausea and vomiting (P = 0.002) and fever (P = 0.002) were higher in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group, while the majority of these adverse events were mild and tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib plus DEB-TACE is superior to regorafenib monotherapy regarding treatment response, PFS and OS, while induces tolerable post-embolization syndrome in CRLM patients who fail standard treatment regimens. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8397621/ /pubmed/34302208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article – Cancer Research Cao, Fei Zheng, Jiaping Luo, Jun Zhang, Zhewei Shao, Guoliang Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens |
title | Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens |
title_full | Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens |
title_fullStr | Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens |
title_short | Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens |
title_sort | treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens |
topic | Original Article – Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34302208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caofei treatmentefficacyandsafetyofregorafenibplusdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationversusregorafenibmonotherapyincolorectalcancerlivermetastasispatientswhofailstandardtreatmentregimens AT zhengjiaping treatmentefficacyandsafetyofregorafenibplusdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationversusregorafenibmonotherapyincolorectalcancerlivermetastasispatientswhofailstandardtreatmentregimens AT luojun treatmentefficacyandsafetyofregorafenibplusdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationversusregorafenibmonotherapyincolorectalcancerlivermetastasispatientswhofailstandardtreatmentregimens AT zhangzhewei treatmentefficacyandsafetyofregorafenibplusdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationversusregorafenibmonotherapyincolorectalcancerlivermetastasispatientswhofailstandardtreatmentregimens AT shaoguoliang treatmentefficacyandsafetyofregorafenibplusdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationversusregorafenibmonotherapyincolorectalcancerlivermetastasispatientswhofailstandardtreatmentregimens |