Cargando…
Performance of international prognostic indices in plasmablastic lymphoma: a comparative evaluation
PURPOSE: Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare and aggressive B-cell malignancy with a heterogenous clinical and prognostic spectrum, determined by multiple factors, including age, HIV- and MYC-status. While there exist several validated scoring systems for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, which inco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33660007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03580-z |
_version_ | 1783744657628332032 |
---|---|
author | Hertel, Nadine Merz, Hartmut Bernd, Heinz-Wolfram Bernard, Veronica Künstner, Axel Busch, Hauke von Bubnoff, Nikolas Feller, Alfred C. Witte, Hanno M. Gebauer, Niklas |
author_facet | Hertel, Nadine Merz, Hartmut Bernd, Heinz-Wolfram Bernard, Veronica Künstner, Axel Busch, Hauke von Bubnoff, Nikolas Feller, Alfred C. Witte, Hanno M. Gebauer, Niklas |
author_sort | Hertel, Nadine |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare and aggressive B-cell malignancy with a heterogenous clinical and prognostic spectrum, determined by multiple factors, including age, HIV- and MYC-status. While there exist several validated scoring systems for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, which incorporate basic clinical features (age, lactate dehydrogenase, sites of (extranodal) involvement, stage and performance), none of these have been systematically assessed in PBL. METHODS: We determined the (age-adjusted; aa)-International Prognostic Index (IPI), revised IPI (R-IPI), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (NCCN-IPI) in a comprehensive multi-center cohort (n = 78) of PBL patients. Further, all indices were comparatively investigated for model quality and concordance. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed significant prognostic capabilities for all indices, all of which identified a subgroup with favorable outcome. Discriminatory power between patients with less benign prognosis and especially refractory disease exhibited significant variability. Subsequently, stratified models for each risk score were compared employing corrected Akaike’s information criterion (cAIC) and Harrel’s concordance index (c-index). Here, the NCCN-IPI outperformed both IPI and R-IPI regarding c-index with ambiguous cAIC results, underlining its clinical utility and suggesting it for preferential use in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Our current observations support the use of the IPI and its enhanced derivatives in PBL patients. There is, however, a distinct requirement for novel prognostic tools to better delineate subgroups at risk for early relapse or refractory disease as well as late relapse. A comprehensive molecular characterization of a clinically annotated cohort of PBL patients is therefore urgently warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03580-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8397630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83976302021-09-14 Performance of international prognostic indices in plasmablastic lymphoma: a comparative evaluation Hertel, Nadine Merz, Hartmut Bernd, Heinz-Wolfram Bernard, Veronica Künstner, Axel Busch, Hauke von Bubnoff, Nikolas Feller, Alfred C. Witte, Hanno M. Gebauer, Niklas J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare and aggressive B-cell malignancy with a heterogenous clinical and prognostic spectrum, determined by multiple factors, including age, HIV- and MYC-status. While there exist several validated scoring systems for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, which incorporate basic clinical features (age, lactate dehydrogenase, sites of (extranodal) involvement, stage and performance), none of these have been systematically assessed in PBL. METHODS: We determined the (age-adjusted; aa)-International Prognostic Index (IPI), revised IPI (R-IPI), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (NCCN-IPI) in a comprehensive multi-center cohort (n = 78) of PBL patients. Further, all indices were comparatively investigated for model quality and concordance. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed significant prognostic capabilities for all indices, all of which identified a subgroup with favorable outcome. Discriminatory power between patients with less benign prognosis and especially refractory disease exhibited significant variability. Subsequently, stratified models for each risk score were compared employing corrected Akaike’s information criterion (cAIC) and Harrel’s concordance index (c-index). Here, the NCCN-IPI outperformed both IPI and R-IPI regarding c-index with ambiguous cAIC results, underlining its clinical utility and suggesting it for preferential use in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Our current observations support the use of the IPI and its enhanced derivatives in PBL patients. There is, however, a distinct requirement for novel prognostic tools to better delineate subgroups at risk for early relapse or refractory disease as well as late relapse. A comprehensive molecular characterization of a clinically annotated cohort of PBL patients is therefore urgently warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03580-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8397630/ /pubmed/33660007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03580-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article – Clinical Oncology Hertel, Nadine Merz, Hartmut Bernd, Heinz-Wolfram Bernard, Veronica Künstner, Axel Busch, Hauke von Bubnoff, Nikolas Feller, Alfred C. Witte, Hanno M. Gebauer, Niklas Performance of international prognostic indices in plasmablastic lymphoma: a comparative evaluation |
title | Performance of international prognostic indices in plasmablastic lymphoma: a comparative evaluation |
title_full | Performance of international prognostic indices in plasmablastic lymphoma: a comparative evaluation |
title_fullStr | Performance of international prognostic indices in plasmablastic lymphoma: a comparative evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of international prognostic indices in plasmablastic lymphoma: a comparative evaluation |
title_short | Performance of international prognostic indices in plasmablastic lymphoma: a comparative evaluation |
title_sort | performance of international prognostic indices in plasmablastic lymphoma: a comparative evaluation |
topic | Original Article – Clinical Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33660007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03580-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hertelnadine performanceofinternationalprognosticindicesinplasmablasticlymphomaacomparativeevaluation AT merzhartmut performanceofinternationalprognosticindicesinplasmablasticlymphomaacomparativeevaluation AT berndheinzwolfram performanceofinternationalprognosticindicesinplasmablasticlymphomaacomparativeevaluation AT bernardveronica performanceofinternationalprognosticindicesinplasmablasticlymphomaacomparativeevaluation AT kunstneraxel performanceofinternationalprognosticindicesinplasmablasticlymphomaacomparativeevaluation AT buschhauke performanceofinternationalprognosticindicesinplasmablasticlymphomaacomparativeevaluation AT vonbubnoffnikolas performanceofinternationalprognosticindicesinplasmablasticlymphomaacomparativeevaluation AT felleralfredc performanceofinternationalprognosticindicesinplasmablasticlymphomaacomparativeevaluation AT wittehannom performanceofinternationalprognosticindicesinplasmablasticlymphomaacomparativeevaluation AT gebauerniklas performanceofinternationalprognosticindicesinplasmablasticlymphomaacomparativeevaluation |