Cargando…

Daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND: In multiple studies, the potential relationship between daylight saving time (DST) and the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been investigated, with mixed results. Using the Dutch Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) registry facilitated by the Netherlands Heart Regi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derks, L., Houterman, S., Geuzebroek, G. S. C., van der Harst, P., Smits, P. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33765223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-021-01566-7
_version_ 1783744694767845376
author Derks, L.
Houterman, S.
Geuzebroek, G. S. C.
van der Harst, P.
Smits, P. C.
author_facet Derks, L.
Houterman, S.
Geuzebroek, G. S. C.
van der Harst, P.
Smits, P. C.
author_sort Derks, L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In multiple studies, the potential relationship between daylight saving time (DST) and the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been investigated, with mixed results. Using the Dutch Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) registry facilitated by the Netherlands Heart Registration, we investigated whether the transitions to and from DST interact with the incidence rate of PCI for acute MI. METHODS: We assessed changes in hospital admissions for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) undergoing PCI between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018. We compared the incidence rate of PCI procedures during the first 3 or 7 days after the transition with that during a control period (2 weeks before transition plus second week after transition). Incidence rate ratio (IRR) was calculated using Poisson regression. Potential gender differences were also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 80,970 PCI procedures for STEMI or NSTEMI were performed. No difference in incidence rate a week after the transition to DST in spring was observed for STEMI (IRR 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.03) or NSTEMI (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96–1.12). After the transition from DST in autumn, the IRR was also comparable with the control period (STEMI: 1.03, 95% CI 0.95–1.12, and NSTEMI: 0.98, 95% CI 0.91–1.06). Observing the first 3 days after each transition yielded similar results. Gender-specific results were comparable. CONCLUSION: Based on data from a large, nationwide registry, there was no correlation between the transition to or from DST and a change in the incidence rate of PCI for acute MI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8397810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83978102021-09-15 Daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands Derks, L. Houterman, S. Geuzebroek, G. S. C. van der Harst, P. Smits, P. C. Neth Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: In multiple studies, the potential relationship between daylight saving time (DST) and the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been investigated, with mixed results. Using the Dutch Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) registry facilitated by the Netherlands Heart Registration, we investigated whether the transitions to and from DST interact with the incidence rate of PCI for acute MI. METHODS: We assessed changes in hospital admissions for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) undergoing PCI between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018. We compared the incidence rate of PCI procedures during the first 3 or 7 days after the transition with that during a control period (2 weeks before transition plus second week after transition). Incidence rate ratio (IRR) was calculated using Poisson regression. Potential gender differences were also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 80,970 PCI procedures for STEMI or NSTEMI were performed. No difference in incidence rate a week after the transition to DST in spring was observed for STEMI (IRR 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.03) or NSTEMI (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96–1.12). After the transition from DST in autumn, the IRR was also comparable with the control period (STEMI: 1.03, 95% CI 0.95–1.12, and NSTEMI: 0.98, 95% CI 0.91–1.06). Observing the first 3 days after each transition yielded similar results. Gender-specific results were comparable. CONCLUSION: Based on data from a large, nationwide registry, there was no correlation between the transition to or from DST and a change in the incidence rate of PCI for acute MI. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021-03-25 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8397810/ /pubmed/33765223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-021-01566-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Derks, L.
Houterman, S.
Geuzebroek, G. S. C.
van der Harst, P.
Smits, P. C.
Daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands
title Daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands
title_full Daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands
title_fullStr Daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands
title_short Daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands
title_sort daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the netherlands
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33765223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-021-01566-7
work_keys_str_mv AT derksl daylightsavingtimedoesnotseemtobeassociatedwithnumberofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsforacutemyocardialinfarctioninthenetherlands
AT houtermans daylightsavingtimedoesnotseemtobeassociatedwithnumberofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsforacutemyocardialinfarctioninthenetherlands
AT geuzebroekgsc daylightsavingtimedoesnotseemtobeassociatedwithnumberofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsforacutemyocardialinfarctioninthenetherlands
AT vanderharstp daylightsavingtimedoesnotseemtobeassociatedwithnumberofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsforacutemyocardialinfarctioninthenetherlands
AT smitspc daylightsavingtimedoesnotseemtobeassociatedwithnumberofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsforacutemyocardialinfarctioninthenetherlands
AT daylightsavingtimedoesnotseemtobeassociatedwithnumberofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsforacutemyocardialinfarctioninthenetherlands