Cargando…

Could Polyphenols Really Be a Good Radioprotective Strategy?

Currently, radiotherapy is one of the most effective strategies to treat cancer. However, deleterious toxicity against normal cells indicate for the need to selectively protect them. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species reinforce ionizing radiation cytotoxicity, and compounds able to scavenge these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faramarzi, Shadab, Piccolella, Simona, Manti, Lorenzo, Pacifico, Severina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8398122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34443561
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164969
_version_ 1783744762451329024
author Faramarzi, Shadab
Piccolella, Simona
Manti, Lorenzo
Pacifico, Severina
author_facet Faramarzi, Shadab
Piccolella, Simona
Manti, Lorenzo
Pacifico, Severina
author_sort Faramarzi, Shadab
collection PubMed
description Currently, radiotherapy is one of the most effective strategies to treat cancer. However, deleterious toxicity against normal cells indicate for the need to selectively protect them. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species reinforce ionizing radiation cytotoxicity, and compounds able to scavenge these species or enhance antioxidant enzymes (e.g., superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase) should be properly investigated. Antioxidant plant-derived compounds, such as phenols and polyphenols, could represent a valuable alternative to synthetic compounds to be used as radio-protective agents. In fact, their dose-dependent antioxidant/pro-oxidant efficacy could provide a high degree of protection to normal tissues, with little or no protection to tumor cells. The present review provides an update of the current scientific knowledge of polyphenols in pure forms or in plant extracts with good evidence concerning their possible radiomodulating action. Indeed, with few exceptions, to date, the fragmentary data available mostly derive from in vitro studies, which do not find comfort in preclinical and/or clinical studies. On the contrary, when preclinical studies are reported, especially regarding the bioactivity of a plant extract, its chemical composition is not taken into account, avoiding any standardization and compromising data reproducibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8398122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83981222021-08-29 Could Polyphenols Really Be a Good Radioprotective Strategy? Faramarzi, Shadab Piccolella, Simona Manti, Lorenzo Pacifico, Severina Molecules Review Currently, radiotherapy is one of the most effective strategies to treat cancer. However, deleterious toxicity against normal cells indicate for the need to selectively protect them. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species reinforce ionizing radiation cytotoxicity, and compounds able to scavenge these species or enhance antioxidant enzymes (e.g., superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase) should be properly investigated. Antioxidant plant-derived compounds, such as phenols and polyphenols, could represent a valuable alternative to synthetic compounds to be used as radio-protective agents. In fact, their dose-dependent antioxidant/pro-oxidant efficacy could provide a high degree of protection to normal tissues, with little or no protection to tumor cells. The present review provides an update of the current scientific knowledge of polyphenols in pure forms or in plant extracts with good evidence concerning their possible radiomodulating action. Indeed, with few exceptions, to date, the fragmentary data available mostly derive from in vitro studies, which do not find comfort in preclinical and/or clinical studies. On the contrary, when preclinical studies are reported, especially regarding the bioactivity of a plant extract, its chemical composition is not taken into account, avoiding any standardization and compromising data reproducibility. MDPI 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8398122/ /pubmed/34443561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164969 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Faramarzi, Shadab
Piccolella, Simona
Manti, Lorenzo
Pacifico, Severina
Could Polyphenols Really Be a Good Radioprotective Strategy?
title Could Polyphenols Really Be a Good Radioprotective Strategy?
title_full Could Polyphenols Really Be a Good Radioprotective Strategy?
title_fullStr Could Polyphenols Really Be a Good Radioprotective Strategy?
title_full_unstemmed Could Polyphenols Really Be a Good Radioprotective Strategy?
title_short Could Polyphenols Really Be a Good Radioprotective Strategy?
title_sort could polyphenols really be a good radioprotective strategy?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8398122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34443561
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164969
work_keys_str_mv AT faramarzishadab couldpolyphenolsreallybeagoodradioprotectivestrategy
AT piccolellasimona couldpolyphenolsreallybeagoodradioprotectivestrategy
AT mantilorenzo couldpolyphenolsreallybeagoodradioprotectivestrategy
AT pacificoseverina couldpolyphenolsreallybeagoodradioprotectivestrategy