Cargando…
Subcritical Extracts from Major Species of Oil-Bearing Roses—A Comparative Chemical Profiling
A comprehensive chemical profiling of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (freon R134a) subcritical extracts from the main genotypes of oil-bearing roses, was performed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) in order to reveal the differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8398789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34443579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164991 |
_version_ | 1783744922452492288 |
---|---|
author | Dobreva, Ana Nedeltcheva-Antonova, Daniela Nenov, Nenko Getchovska, Kamelia Antonov, Liudmil |
author_facet | Dobreva, Ana Nedeltcheva-Antonova, Daniela Nenov, Nenko Getchovska, Kamelia Antonov, Liudmil |
author_sort | Dobreva, Ana |
collection | PubMed |
description | A comprehensive chemical profiling of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (freon R134a) subcritical extracts from the main genotypes of oil-bearing roses, was performed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) in order to reveal the differences in their chemical composition. One hundred and three individual compounds were identified using GC/MS and their quantitative content was determined using GC-FID, representing 89.8, 92.5, 89.7 and 93.7% of the total content of Rosa gallica L., Rosa damascena Mill., Rosa alba L. and Rosa centifolia L. extracts, respectively. The compounds found in the extracts are representatives of the following main chemical classes: mono-, sesqui- and triterpenoids, phenylethanoids and phenylpropanoids and aliphatic hydrocarbons. Fatty acids, esters and waxes were found, as well. The study revealed that 2-phenylethanol is the most abundant component, ranging 9.0–60.9% followed by nonadecane and nonadecene with 5.1–18.0% geraniol (2.9–14.4%), heneicosane (3.1–11.8%), tricosane (0.1–8.6%), nerol (1.3–6.1%) and citronellol (1.7–5.3%). The extracts demonstrate a specific chemical profile, depending on the botanical species—phenylethanoids and phenyl propanoids are the main group for R. damascena, aliphatic hydrocarbons for R. alba and R. centifolia, while both are found in almost equal amounts in R. gallica. The terpenoid compounds show relatively broad variations: monoterpenes—11.9–25.5% with maximum in R. centifolia; sesquiterpenes—0.6–7.0% with maximum in R. gallica and triterpenes—0.4–3.7% with maximum in R. gallica extract. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8398789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83987892021-08-29 Subcritical Extracts from Major Species of Oil-Bearing Roses—A Comparative Chemical Profiling Dobreva, Ana Nedeltcheva-Antonova, Daniela Nenov, Nenko Getchovska, Kamelia Antonov, Liudmil Molecules Article A comprehensive chemical profiling of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (freon R134a) subcritical extracts from the main genotypes of oil-bearing roses, was performed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) in order to reveal the differences in their chemical composition. One hundred and three individual compounds were identified using GC/MS and their quantitative content was determined using GC-FID, representing 89.8, 92.5, 89.7 and 93.7% of the total content of Rosa gallica L., Rosa damascena Mill., Rosa alba L. and Rosa centifolia L. extracts, respectively. The compounds found in the extracts are representatives of the following main chemical classes: mono-, sesqui- and triterpenoids, phenylethanoids and phenylpropanoids and aliphatic hydrocarbons. Fatty acids, esters and waxes were found, as well. The study revealed that 2-phenylethanol is the most abundant component, ranging 9.0–60.9% followed by nonadecane and nonadecene with 5.1–18.0% geraniol (2.9–14.4%), heneicosane (3.1–11.8%), tricosane (0.1–8.6%), nerol (1.3–6.1%) and citronellol (1.7–5.3%). The extracts demonstrate a specific chemical profile, depending on the botanical species—phenylethanoids and phenyl propanoids are the main group for R. damascena, aliphatic hydrocarbons for R. alba and R. centifolia, while both are found in almost equal amounts in R. gallica. The terpenoid compounds show relatively broad variations: monoterpenes—11.9–25.5% with maximum in R. centifolia; sesquiterpenes—0.6–7.0% with maximum in R. gallica and triterpenes—0.4–3.7% with maximum in R. gallica extract. MDPI 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8398789/ /pubmed/34443579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164991 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dobreva, Ana Nedeltcheva-Antonova, Daniela Nenov, Nenko Getchovska, Kamelia Antonov, Liudmil Subcritical Extracts from Major Species of Oil-Bearing Roses—A Comparative Chemical Profiling |
title | Subcritical Extracts from Major Species of Oil-Bearing Roses—A Comparative Chemical Profiling |
title_full | Subcritical Extracts from Major Species of Oil-Bearing Roses—A Comparative Chemical Profiling |
title_fullStr | Subcritical Extracts from Major Species of Oil-Bearing Roses—A Comparative Chemical Profiling |
title_full_unstemmed | Subcritical Extracts from Major Species of Oil-Bearing Roses—A Comparative Chemical Profiling |
title_short | Subcritical Extracts from Major Species of Oil-Bearing Roses—A Comparative Chemical Profiling |
title_sort | subcritical extracts from major species of oil-bearing roses—a comparative chemical profiling |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8398789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34443579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26164991 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dobrevaana subcriticalextractsfrommajorspeciesofoilbearingrosesacomparativechemicalprofiling AT nedeltchevaantonovadaniela subcriticalextractsfrommajorspeciesofoilbearingrosesacomparativechemicalprofiling AT nenovnenko subcriticalextractsfrommajorspeciesofoilbearingrosesacomparativechemicalprofiling AT getchovskakamelia subcriticalextractsfrommajorspeciesofoilbearingrosesacomparativechemicalprofiling AT antonovliudmil subcriticalextractsfrommajorspeciesofoilbearingrosesacomparativechemicalprofiling |