Cargando…

Effect of an Antenatal Lifestyle Intervention on Dietary Inflammatory Index and Its Associations with Maternal and Fetal Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of the PEARS Trial

We investigated the effect of an antenatal lifestyle intervention of a low-glycaemic index (GI) diet and physical activity on energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index (E-DII(TM)) and explored its relationship with maternal and child health in women with overweight and obesity. This was a secondary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Killeen, Sarah Louise, Phillips, Catherine M., Delahunt, Anna, Yelverton, Cara A., Shivappa, Nitin, Hébert, James R., Kennelly, Maria A., Cronin, Martina, Mehegan, John, McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8399423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34444958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13082798
Descripción
Sumario:We investigated the effect of an antenatal lifestyle intervention of a low-glycaemic index (GI) diet and physical activity on energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index (E-DII(TM)) and explored its relationship with maternal and child health in women with overweight and obesity. This was a secondary analysis of 434 mother−child pairs from the Pregnancy Exercise and Nutrition Study (PEARS) trial in Dublin, Ireland. E-DII(TM) scores were calculated for early (10–16 weeks) and late (28 weeks) pregnancy. Outcomes included lipids, inflammation markers, insulin resistance, mode of delivery, infant size, pre-eclampsia, and gestational diabetes. T-tests were used to assess changes in E-DII(TM). Chi-square, correlations, and multiple regression were employed to investigate relationships with outcomes. The mean (SD) age of participants was 32.45 (4.29) years with median (IQR) BMI 28.25 (26.70, 31.34) kg/m(2). There was no change in E-DII(TM) in the controls (−0.14 (1.19) vs. −0.07 (1.09), p = 0.465) but E-DII(TM) reduced by 10% after the intervention (0.01 (1.07) vs −0.75 (1.05), p < 0.001). No associations were found between early pregnancy E-DII(TM) and maternal and child outcomes, except for increased odds of adverse cardiometabolic phenotype in women who delivered male (OR = 2.29, p = 0.010) but not female infants (OR = 0.99, p = 0.960). A low-GI antenatal intervention can reduce the inflammatory potential of diets. Sex differences should be explored further in future research.