Cargando…
Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry
PURPOSE: To enhance the current standards of subclinical keratoconus screening based on the statistical modeling of the pixel intensity distribution of Scheimpflug images. METHODS: Scheimpflug corneal tomographies corresponding to 25 corneal meridians of 60 participants were retrospectively collecte...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8399563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34436543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.9.32 |
_version_ | 1783745105857871872 |
---|---|
author | Consejo, Alejandra Jiménez-García, Marta Issarti, Ikram Rozema, Jos J. |
author_facet | Consejo, Alejandra Jiménez-García, Marta Issarti, Ikram Rozema, Jos J. |
author_sort | Consejo, Alejandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To enhance the current standards of subclinical keratoconus screening based on the statistical modeling of the pixel intensity distribution of Scheimpflug images. METHODS: Scheimpflug corneal tomographies corresponding to 25 corneal meridians of 60 participants were retrospectively collected and divided into three groups: controls (20 eyes), subclinical keratoconus (20 eyes), and clinical keratoconus (20 eyes). Only right eyes were selected. After corneal segmentation, pixel intensities of the stromal tissue were statistically modeled using a Weibull probability density function from which parameter α (pixel brightness) was derived. Further, data were transformed to polar coordinates, smoothed, and interpolated to build a map of the corneal α parameter. The discriminative power of the method was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The proposed platform-independent method achieved a higher performance in discriminating subclinical keratoconus from control eyes (90.0% sensitivity, 95.0% specificity, 0.97 area under the curve [AUC]) than the standard method (Belin–Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display), which uses only corneal morphometry (85.0% sensitivity, 85.0% specificity, 0.80 AUC). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of light backscatter at the cornea successfully discriminates subclinical keratoconus from control eyes, upgrading the results previously reported in the literature. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The proposed methodology has the potential to support clinicians in the detection of keratoconus before showing clinical signs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8399563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83995632021-09-13 Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry Consejo, Alejandra Jiménez-García, Marta Issarti, Ikram Rozema, Jos J. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To enhance the current standards of subclinical keratoconus screening based on the statistical modeling of the pixel intensity distribution of Scheimpflug images. METHODS: Scheimpflug corneal tomographies corresponding to 25 corneal meridians of 60 participants were retrospectively collected and divided into three groups: controls (20 eyes), subclinical keratoconus (20 eyes), and clinical keratoconus (20 eyes). Only right eyes were selected. After corneal segmentation, pixel intensities of the stromal tissue were statistically modeled using a Weibull probability density function from which parameter α (pixel brightness) was derived. Further, data were transformed to polar coordinates, smoothed, and interpolated to build a map of the corneal α parameter. The discriminative power of the method was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The proposed platform-independent method achieved a higher performance in discriminating subclinical keratoconus from control eyes (90.0% sensitivity, 95.0% specificity, 0.97 area under the curve [AUC]) than the standard method (Belin–Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display), which uses only corneal morphometry (85.0% sensitivity, 85.0% specificity, 0.80 AUC). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of light backscatter at the cornea successfully discriminates subclinical keratoconus from control eyes, upgrading the results previously reported in the literature. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The proposed methodology has the potential to support clinicians in the detection of keratoconus before showing clinical signs. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8399563/ /pubmed/34436543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.9.32 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Consejo, Alejandra Jiménez-García, Marta Issarti, Ikram Rozema, Jos J. Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry |
title | Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry |
title_full | Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry |
title_fullStr | Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry |
title_short | Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry |
title_sort | detection of subclinical keratoconus with a validated alternative method to corneal densitometry |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8399563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34436543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.9.32 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT consejoalejandra detectionofsubclinicalkeratoconuswithavalidatedalternativemethodtocornealdensitometry AT jimenezgarciamarta detectionofsubclinicalkeratoconuswithavalidatedalternativemethodtocornealdensitometry AT issartiikram detectionofsubclinicalkeratoconuswithavalidatedalternativemethodtocornealdensitometry AT rozemajosj detectionofsubclinicalkeratoconuswithavalidatedalternativemethodtocornealdensitometry |