Cargando…

Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry

PURPOSE: To enhance the current standards of subclinical keratoconus screening based on the statistical modeling of the pixel intensity distribution of Scheimpflug images. METHODS: Scheimpflug corneal tomographies corresponding to 25 corneal meridians of 60 participants were retrospectively collecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Consejo, Alejandra, Jiménez-García, Marta, Issarti, Ikram, Rozema, Jos J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8399563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34436543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.9.32
_version_ 1783745105857871872
author Consejo, Alejandra
Jiménez-García, Marta
Issarti, Ikram
Rozema, Jos J.
author_facet Consejo, Alejandra
Jiménez-García, Marta
Issarti, Ikram
Rozema, Jos J.
author_sort Consejo, Alejandra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To enhance the current standards of subclinical keratoconus screening based on the statistical modeling of the pixel intensity distribution of Scheimpflug images. METHODS: Scheimpflug corneal tomographies corresponding to 25 corneal meridians of 60 participants were retrospectively collected and divided into three groups: controls (20 eyes), subclinical keratoconus (20 eyes), and clinical keratoconus (20 eyes). Only right eyes were selected. After corneal segmentation, pixel intensities of the stromal tissue were statistically modeled using a Weibull probability density function from which parameter α (pixel brightness) was derived. Further, data were transformed to polar coordinates, smoothed, and interpolated to build a map of the corneal α parameter. The discriminative power of the method was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The proposed platform-independent method achieved a higher performance in discriminating subclinical keratoconus from control eyes (90.0% sensitivity, 95.0% specificity, 0.97 area under the curve [AUC]) than the standard method (Belin–Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display), which uses only corneal morphometry (85.0% sensitivity, 85.0% specificity, 0.80 AUC). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of light backscatter at the cornea successfully discriminates subclinical keratoconus from control eyes, upgrading the results previously reported in the literature. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The proposed methodology has the potential to support clinicians in the detection of keratoconus before showing clinical signs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8399563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83995632021-09-13 Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry Consejo, Alejandra Jiménez-García, Marta Issarti, Ikram Rozema, Jos J. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To enhance the current standards of subclinical keratoconus screening based on the statistical modeling of the pixel intensity distribution of Scheimpflug images. METHODS: Scheimpflug corneal tomographies corresponding to 25 corneal meridians of 60 participants were retrospectively collected and divided into three groups: controls (20 eyes), subclinical keratoconus (20 eyes), and clinical keratoconus (20 eyes). Only right eyes were selected. After corneal segmentation, pixel intensities of the stromal tissue were statistically modeled using a Weibull probability density function from which parameter α (pixel brightness) was derived. Further, data were transformed to polar coordinates, smoothed, and interpolated to build a map of the corneal α parameter. The discriminative power of the method was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The proposed platform-independent method achieved a higher performance in discriminating subclinical keratoconus from control eyes (90.0% sensitivity, 95.0% specificity, 0.97 area under the curve [AUC]) than the standard method (Belin–Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display), which uses only corneal morphometry (85.0% sensitivity, 85.0% specificity, 0.80 AUC). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of light backscatter at the cornea successfully discriminates subclinical keratoconus from control eyes, upgrading the results previously reported in the literature. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The proposed methodology has the potential to support clinicians in the detection of keratoconus before showing clinical signs. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8399563/ /pubmed/34436543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.9.32 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Consejo, Alejandra
Jiménez-García, Marta
Issarti, Ikram
Rozema, Jos J.
Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry
title Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry
title_full Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry
title_fullStr Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry
title_short Detection of Subclinical Keratoconus With a Validated Alternative Method to Corneal Densitometry
title_sort detection of subclinical keratoconus with a validated alternative method to corneal densitometry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8399563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34436543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.9.32
work_keys_str_mv AT consejoalejandra detectionofsubclinicalkeratoconuswithavalidatedalternativemethodtocornealdensitometry
AT jimenezgarciamarta detectionofsubclinicalkeratoconuswithavalidatedalternativemethodtocornealdensitometry
AT issartiikram detectionofsubclinicalkeratoconuswithavalidatedalternativemethodtocornealdensitometry
AT rozemajosj detectionofsubclinicalkeratoconuswithavalidatedalternativemethodtocornealdensitometry