Cargando…

Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model

Aim: To determine whether an AI model and single sensor measuring acceleration and ECG could model cognitive and physical fatigue for a self-paced trail run. Methods: A field-based protocol of continuous fatigue repeated hourly induced physical (~45 min) and cognitive (~10 min) fatigue on one health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russell, Brian, McDaid, Andrew, Toscano, William, Hume, Patria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8399921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34450884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165442
_version_ 1783745191071449088
author Russell, Brian
McDaid, Andrew
Toscano, William
Hume, Patria
author_facet Russell, Brian
McDaid, Andrew
Toscano, William
Hume, Patria
author_sort Russell, Brian
collection PubMed
description Aim: To determine whether an AI model and single sensor measuring acceleration and ECG could model cognitive and physical fatigue for a self-paced trail run. Methods: A field-based protocol of continuous fatigue repeated hourly induced physical (~45 min) and cognitive (~10 min) fatigue on one healthy participant. The physical load was a 3.8 km, 200 m vertical gain, trail run, with acceleration and electrocardiogram (ECG) data collected using a single sensor. Cognitive load was a Multi Attribute Test Battery (MATB) and separate assessment battery included the Finger Tap Test (FTT), Stroop, Trail Making A and B, Spatial Memory, Paced Visual Serial Addition Test (PVSAT), and a vertical jump. A fatigue prediction model was implemented using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Results: When the fatigue test battery results were compared for sensitivity to the protocol load, FTT right hand (R(2) 0.71) and Jump Height (R(2) 0.78) were the most sensitive while the other tests were less sensitive (R(2) values Stroop 0.49, Trail Making A 0.29, Trail Making B 0.05, PVSAT 0.03, spatial memory 0.003). The best prediction results were achieved with a rolling average of 200 predictions (102.4 s), during set activity types, mean absolute error for ‘walk up’ (MAE200 12.5%), and range of absolute error for ‘run down’ (RAE200 16.7%). Conclusions: We were able to measure cognitive and physical fatigue using a single wearable sensor during a practical field protocol, including contextual factors in conjunction with a neural network model. This research has practical application to fatigue research in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8399921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83999212021-08-29 Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model Russell, Brian McDaid, Andrew Toscano, William Hume, Patria Sensors (Basel) Article Aim: To determine whether an AI model and single sensor measuring acceleration and ECG could model cognitive and physical fatigue for a self-paced trail run. Methods: A field-based protocol of continuous fatigue repeated hourly induced physical (~45 min) and cognitive (~10 min) fatigue on one healthy participant. The physical load was a 3.8 km, 200 m vertical gain, trail run, with acceleration and electrocardiogram (ECG) data collected using a single sensor. Cognitive load was a Multi Attribute Test Battery (MATB) and separate assessment battery included the Finger Tap Test (FTT), Stroop, Trail Making A and B, Spatial Memory, Paced Visual Serial Addition Test (PVSAT), and a vertical jump. A fatigue prediction model was implemented using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Results: When the fatigue test battery results were compared for sensitivity to the protocol load, FTT right hand (R(2) 0.71) and Jump Height (R(2) 0.78) were the most sensitive while the other tests were less sensitive (R(2) values Stroop 0.49, Trail Making A 0.29, Trail Making B 0.05, PVSAT 0.03, spatial memory 0.003). The best prediction results were achieved with a rolling average of 200 predictions (102.4 s), during set activity types, mean absolute error for ‘walk up’ (MAE200 12.5%), and range of absolute error for ‘run down’ (RAE200 16.7%). Conclusions: We were able to measure cognitive and physical fatigue using a single wearable sensor during a practical field protocol, including contextual factors in conjunction with a neural network model. This research has practical application to fatigue research in the field. MDPI 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8399921/ /pubmed/34450884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165442 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Russell, Brian
McDaid, Andrew
Toscano, William
Hume, Patria
Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model
title Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model
title_full Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model
title_fullStr Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model
title_short Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model
title_sort predicting fatigue in long duration mountain events with a single sensor and deep learning model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8399921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34450884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165442
work_keys_str_mv AT russellbrian predictingfatigueinlongdurationmountaineventswithasinglesensoranddeeplearningmodel
AT mcdaidandrew predictingfatigueinlongdurationmountaineventswithasinglesensoranddeeplearningmodel
AT toscanowilliam predictingfatigueinlongdurationmountaineventswithasinglesensoranddeeplearningmodel
AT humepatria predictingfatigueinlongdurationmountaineventswithasinglesensoranddeeplearningmodel