Cargando…
Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model
Aim: To determine whether an AI model and single sensor measuring acceleration and ECG could model cognitive and physical fatigue for a self-paced trail run. Methods: A field-based protocol of continuous fatigue repeated hourly induced physical (~45 min) and cognitive (~10 min) fatigue on one health...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8399921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34450884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165442 |
_version_ | 1783745191071449088 |
---|---|
author | Russell, Brian McDaid, Andrew Toscano, William Hume, Patria |
author_facet | Russell, Brian McDaid, Andrew Toscano, William Hume, Patria |
author_sort | Russell, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: To determine whether an AI model and single sensor measuring acceleration and ECG could model cognitive and physical fatigue for a self-paced trail run. Methods: A field-based protocol of continuous fatigue repeated hourly induced physical (~45 min) and cognitive (~10 min) fatigue on one healthy participant. The physical load was a 3.8 km, 200 m vertical gain, trail run, with acceleration and electrocardiogram (ECG) data collected using a single sensor. Cognitive load was a Multi Attribute Test Battery (MATB) and separate assessment battery included the Finger Tap Test (FTT), Stroop, Trail Making A and B, Spatial Memory, Paced Visual Serial Addition Test (PVSAT), and a vertical jump. A fatigue prediction model was implemented using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Results: When the fatigue test battery results were compared for sensitivity to the protocol load, FTT right hand (R(2) 0.71) and Jump Height (R(2) 0.78) were the most sensitive while the other tests were less sensitive (R(2) values Stroop 0.49, Trail Making A 0.29, Trail Making B 0.05, PVSAT 0.03, spatial memory 0.003). The best prediction results were achieved with a rolling average of 200 predictions (102.4 s), during set activity types, mean absolute error for ‘walk up’ (MAE200 12.5%), and range of absolute error for ‘run down’ (RAE200 16.7%). Conclusions: We were able to measure cognitive and physical fatigue using a single wearable sensor during a practical field protocol, including contextual factors in conjunction with a neural network model. This research has practical application to fatigue research in the field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8399921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83999212021-08-29 Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model Russell, Brian McDaid, Andrew Toscano, William Hume, Patria Sensors (Basel) Article Aim: To determine whether an AI model and single sensor measuring acceleration and ECG could model cognitive and physical fatigue for a self-paced trail run. Methods: A field-based protocol of continuous fatigue repeated hourly induced physical (~45 min) and cognitive (~10 min) fatigue on one healthy participant. The physical load was a 3.8 km, 200 m vertical gain, trail run, with acceleration and electrocardiogram (ECG) data collected using a single sensor. Cognitive load was a Multi Attribute Test Battery (MATB) and separate assessment battery included the Finger Tap Test (FTT), Stroop, Trail Making A and B, Spatial Memory, Paced Visual Serial Addition Test (PVSAT), and a vertical jump. A fatigue prediction model was implemented using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Results: When the fatigue test battery results were compared for sensitivity to the protocol load, FTT right hand (R(2) 0.71) and Jump Height (R(2) 0.78) were the most sensitive while the other tests were less sensitive (R(2) values Stroop 0.49, Trail Making A 0.29, Trail Making B 0.05, PVSAT 0.03, spatial memory 0.003). The best prediction results were achieved with a rolling average of 200 predictions (102.4 s), during set activity types, mean absolute error for ‘walk up’ (MAE200 12.5%), and range of absolute error for ‘run down’ (RAE200 16.7%). Conclusions: We were able to measure cognitive and physical fatigue using a single wearable sensor during a practical field protocol, including contextual factors in conjunction with a neural network model. This research has practical application to fatigue research in the field. MDPI 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8399921/ /pubmed/34450884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165442 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Russell, Brian McDaid, Andrew Toscano, William Hume, Patria Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model |
title | Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model |
title_full | Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model |
title_fullStr | Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model |
title_short | Predicting Fatigue in Long Duration Mountain Events with a Single Sensor and Deep Learning Model |
title_sort | predicting fatigue in long duration mountain events with a single sensor and deep learning model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8399921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34450884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165442 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT russellbrian predictingfatigueinlongdurationmountaineventswithasinglesensoranddeeplearningmodel AT mcdaidandrew predictingfatigueinlongdurationmountaineventswithasinglesensoranddeeplearningmodel AT toscanowilliam predictingfatigueinlongdurationmountaineventswithasinglesensoranddeeplearningmodel AT humepatria predictingfatigueinlongdurationmountaineventswithasinglesensoranddeeplearningmodel |