Cargando…
A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads
Background and objectives: Current guidelines criteria do not satisfactorily discriminate responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). QRS amplitude is an established index to recognize the severity of myocardial disturbance and might be a key to optimal patient selection for CRT. Material...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080815 |
_version_ | 1783745212945793024 |
---|---|
author | Kataoka, Naoya Imamura, Teruhiko Koi, Takahisa Uchida, Keisuke Kinugawa, Koichiro |
author_facet | Kataoka, Naoya Imamura, Teruhiko Koi, Takahisa Uchida, Keisuke Kinugawa, Koichiro |
author_sort | Kataoka, Naoya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and objectives: Current guidelines criteria do not satisfactorily discriminate responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). QRS amplitude is an established index to recognize the severity of myocardial disturbance and might be a key to optimal patient selection for CRT. Materials and Methods: (1) Initial R-wave amplitude, (2) S-wave amplitude, and (3) a summation of maximal R- or R′-wave amplitude and S-wave amplitude were measured at baseline. These parameters were averaged according to right (V1 to V3) or left (V4 to V6) precordial leads. The impact of these parameters on response to CRT, which was defined as a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15% at six-month follow-up, was investigated. Results: Among 47 patients (71 years old, 28 men) who received guideline-indicated CRT implantation, 25 (53%) achieved the definition of CRT responder. Among baseline electrocardiogram parameters, only the higher S-wave amplitude in right precordial leads was an independent predictor of CRT responders (odds ratio: 2.181, 95% confidence interval: 1.078–4.414, p = 0.030) at a cutoff of 1.44 mV. The cutoff was independently associated with cumulative incidence of heart failure readmission and appropriate electrical defibrillation following CRT implantation (p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: Prominent S-wave in right precordial leads might be a promising index to predict left ventricular reverse remodeling and greater clinical outcomes following CRT implantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8400009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84000092021-08-29 A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads Kataoka, Naoya Imamura, Teruhiko Koi, Takahisa Uchida, Keisuke Kinugawa, Koichiro Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and objectives: Current guidelines criteria do not satisfactorily discriminate responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). QRS amplitude is an established index to recognize the severity of myocardial disturbance and might be a key to optimal patient selection for CRT. Materials and Methods: (1) Initial R-wave amplitude, (2) S-wave amplitude, and (3) a summation of maximal R- or R′-wave amplitude and S-wave amplitude were measured at baseline. These parameters were averaged according to right (V1 to V3) or left (V4 to V6) precordial leads. The impact of these parameters on response to CRT, which was defined as a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15% at six-month follow-up, was investigated. Results: Among 47 patients (71 years old, 28 men) who received guideline-indicated CRT implantation, 25 (53%) achieved the definition of CRT responder. Among baseline electrocardiogram parameters, only the higher S-wave amplitude in right precordial leads was an independent predictor of CRT responders (odds ratio: 2.181, 95% confidence interval: 1.078–4.414, p = 0.030) at a cutoff of 1.44 mV. The cutoff was independently associated with cumulative incidence of heart failure readmission and appropriate electrical defibrillation following CRT implantation (p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: Prominent S-wave in right precordial leads might be a promising index to predict left ventricular reverse remodeling and greater clinical outcomes following CRT implantation. MDPI 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8400009/ /pubmed/34441021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080815 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kataoka, Naoya Imamura, Teruhiko Koi, Takahisa Uchida, Keisuke Kinugawa, Koichiro A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads |
title | A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads |
title_full | A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads |
title_fullStr | A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads |
title_full_unstemmed | A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads |
title_short | A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads |
title_sort | simple predictive marker in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients: prominent s-wave in right precordial leads |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080815 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kataokanaoya asimplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads AT imamurateruhiko asimplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads AT koitakahisa asimplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads AT uchidakeisuke asimplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads AT kinugawakoichiro asimplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads AT kataokanaoya simplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads AT imamurateruhiko simplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads AT koitakahisa simplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads AT uchidakeisuke simplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads AT kinugawakoichiro simplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads |