Cargando…

A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads

Background and objectives: Current guidelines criteria do not satisfactorily discriminate responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). QRS amplitude is an established index to recognize the severity of myocardial disturbance and might be a key to optimal patient selection for CRT. Material...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kataoka, Naoya, Imamura, Teruhiko, Koi, Takahisa, Uchida, Keisuke, Kinugawa, Koichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080815
_version_ 1783745212945793024
author Kataoka, Naoya
Imamura, Teruhiko
Koi, Takahisa
Uchida, Keisuke
Kinugawa, Koichiro
author_facet Kataoka, Naoya
Imamura, Teruhiko
Koi, Takahisa
Uchida, Keisuke
Kinugawa, Koichiro
author_sort Kataoka, Naoya
collection PubMed
description Background and objectives: Current guidelines criteria do not satisfactorily discriminate responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). QRS amplitude is an established index to recognize the severity of myocardial disturbance and might be a key to optimal patient selection for CRT. Materials and Methods: (1) Initial R-wave amplitude, (2) S-wave amplitude, and (3) a summation of maximal R- or R′-wave amplitude and S-wave amplitude were measured at baseline. These parameters were averaged according to right (V1 to V3) or left (V4 to V6) precordial leads. The impact of these parameters on response to CRT, which was defined as a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15% at six-month follow-up, was investigated. Results: Among 47 patients (71 years old, 28 men) who received guideline-indicated CRT implantation, 25 (53%) achieved the definition of CRT responder. Among baseline electrocardiogram parameters, only the higher S-wave amplitude in right precordial leads was an independent predictor of CRT responders (odds ratio: 2.181, 95% confidence interval: 1.078–4.414, p = 0.030) at a cutoff of 1.44 mV. The cutoff was independently associated with cumulative incidence of heart failure readmission and appropriate electrical defibrillation following CRT implantation (p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: Prominent S-wave in right precordial leads might be a promising index to predict left ventricular reverse remodeling and greater clinical outcomes following CRT implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8400009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84000092021-08-29 A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads Kataoka, Naoya Imamura, Teruhiko Koi, Takahisa Uchida, Keisuke Kinugawa, Koichiro Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and objectives: Current guidelines criteria do not satisfactorily discriminate responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). QRS amplitude is an established index to recognize the severity of myocardial disturbance and might be a key to optimal patient selection for CRT. Materials and Methods: (1) Initial R-wave amplitude, (2) S-wave amplitude, and (3) a summation of maximal R- or R′-wave amplitude and S-wave amplitude were measured at baseline. These parameters were averaged according to right (V1 to V3) or left (V4 to V6) precordial leads. The impact of these parameters on response to CRT, which was defined as a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15% at six-month follow-up, was investigated. Results: Among 47 patients (71 years old, 28 men) who received guideline-indicated CRT implantation, 25 (53%) achieved the definition of CRT responder. Among baseline electrocardiogram parameters, only the higher S-wave amplitude in right precordial leads was an independent predictor of CRT responders (odds ratio: 2.181, 95% confidence interval: 1.078–4.414, p = 0.030) at a cutoff of 1.44 mV. The cutoff was independently associated with cumulative incidence of heart failure readmission and appropriate electrical defibrillation following CRT implantation (p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: Prominent S-wave in right precordial leads might be a promising index to predict left ventricular reverse remodeling and greater clinical outcomes following CRT implantation. MDPI 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8400009/ /pubmed/34441021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080815 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kataoka, Naoya
Imamura, Teruhiko
Koi, Takahisa
Uchida, Keisuke
Kinugawa, Koichiro
A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads
title A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads
title_full A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads
title_fullStr A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads
title_full_unstemmed A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads
title_short A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads
title_sort simple predictive marker in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients: prominent s-wave in right precordial leads
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34441021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080815
work_keys_str_mv AT kataokanaoya asimplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads
AT imamurateruhiko asimplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads
AT koitakahisa asimplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads
AT uchidakeisuke asimplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads
AT kinugawakoichiro asimplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads
AT kataokanaoya simplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads
AT imamurateruhiko simplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads
AT koitakahisa simplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads
AT uchidakeisuke simplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads
AT kinugawakoichiro simplepredictivemarkerincardiacresynchronizationtherapyrecipientsprominentswaveinrightprecordialleads