Cargando…
The Influence of Modified Experimental Dental Resin Composites on the Initial In Situ Biofilm—A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Split-Mouth Trial
The purpose of the study was to investigate the bacterial viability of the initial biofilm on the surface of experimental modified dental resin composites. Twenty-five healthy individuals with good oral hygiene were included in this study. In a split-mouth design, they received acrylic splints with...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34451352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162814 |
_version_ | 1783745235204964352 |
---|---|
author | Burgard, Niklas Kienitz, Melanie Jourdan, Claudia Rüttermann, Stefan |
author_facet | Burgard, Niklas Kienitz, Melanie Jourdan, Claudia Rüttermann, Stefan |
author_sort | Burgard, Niklas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of the study was to investigate the bacterial viability of the initial biofilm on the surface of experimental modified dental resin composites. Twenty-five healthy individuals with good oral hygiene were included in this study. In a split-mouth design, they received acrylic splints with five experimental composite resin specimens. Four of them were modified with either a novel polymeric hollow-bead delivery system or methacrylated polymerizable Irgasan (Antibacterial B), while one specimen served as an unmodified control (ST). A delivery system based on Poly-Pore(®) was loaded with one of the active agents: Tego(®) Protect 5000 (Antiadhesive A), Dimethicone (Antiadhesive B), or Irgasan (Antibacterial A). All study subjects refrained from toothbrushing during the study period. Specimens were detached from the splints after 8 h and given a live/dead staining before fluorescence microscopy. A Friedman test and a post hoc Nemenyi test were applied with a significance level at p < 0.05. In summary, all materials but Antibacterial B showed a significant antibacterial effect compared to ST. The results suggested the role of the materials’ chemistry in the dominance of cell adhesion. In conclusion, dental resin composites with Poly-Pore-loaded active agents showed antibacterial effectiveness in situ. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8400102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84001022021-08-29 The Influence of Modified Experimental Dental Resin Composites on the Initial In Situ Biofilm—A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Split-Mouth Trial Burgard, Niklas Kienitz, Melanie Jourdan, Claudia Rüttermann, Stefan Polymers (Basel) Article The purpose of the study was to investigate the bacterial viability of the initial biofilm on the surface of experimental modified dental resin composites. Twenty-five healthy individuals with good oral hygiene were included in this study. In a split-mouth design, they received acrylic splints with five experimental composite resin specimens. Four of them were modified with either a novel polymeric hollow-bead delivery system or methacrylated polymerizable Irgasan (Antibacterial B), while one specimen served as an unmodified control (ST). A delivery system based on Poly-Pore(®) was loaded with one of the active agents: Tego(®) Protect 5000 (Antiadhesive A), Dimethicone (Antiadhesive B), or Irgasan (Antibacterial A). All study subjects refrained from toothbrushing during the study period. Specimens were detached from the splints after 8 h and given a live/dead staining before fluorescence microscopy. A Friedman test and a post hoc Nemenyi test were applied with a significance level at p < 0.05. In summary, all materials but Antibacterial B showed a significant antibacterial effect compared to ST. The results suggested the role of the materials’ chemistry in the dominance of cell adhesion. In conclusion, dental resin composites with Poly-Pore-loaded active agents showed antibacterial effectiveness in situ. MDPI 2021-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8400102/ /pubmed/34451352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162814 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Burgard, Niklas Kienitz, Melanie Jourdan, Claudia Rüttermann, Stefan The Influence of Modified Experimental Dental Resin Composites on the Initial In Situ Biofilm—A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Split-Mouth Trial |
title | The Influence of Modified Experimental Dental Resin Composites on the Initial In Situ Biofilm—A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Split-Mouth Trial |
title_full | The Influence of Modified Experimental Dental Resin Composites on the Initial In Situ Biofilm—A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Split-Mouth Trial |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Modified Experimental Dental Resin Composites on the Initial In Situ Biofilm—A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Split-Mouth Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Modified Experimental Dental Resin Composites on the Initial In Situ Biofilm—A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Split-Mouth Trial |
title_short | The Influence of Modified Experimental Dental Resin Composites on the Initial In Situ Biofilm—A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Split-Mouth Trial |
title_sort | influence of modified experimental dental resin composites on the initial in situ biofilm—a triple-blinded, randomized, controlled split-mouth trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34451352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burgardniklas theinfluenceofmodifiedexperimentaldentalresincompositesontheinitialinsitubiofilmatripleblindedrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthtrial AT kienitzmelanie theinfluenceofmodifiedexperimentaldentalresincompositesontheinitialinsitubiofilmatripleblindedrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthtrial AT jourdanclaudia theinfluenceofmodifiedexperimentaldentalresincompositesontheinitialinsitubiofilmatripleblindedrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthtrial AT ruttermannstefan theinfluenceofmodifiedexperimentaldentalresincompositesontheinitialinsitubiofilmatripleblindedrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthtrial AT burgardniklas influenceofmodifiedexperimentaldentalresincompositesontheinitialinsitubiofilmatripleblindedrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthtrial AT kienitzmelanie influenceofmodifiedexperimentaldentalresincompositesontheinitialinsitubiofilmatripleblindedrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthtrial AT jourdanclaudia influenceofmodifiedexperimentaldentalresincompositesontheinitialinsitubiofilmatripleblindedrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthtrial AT ruttermannstefan influenceofmodifiedexperimentaldentalresincompositesontheinitialinsitubiofilmatripleblindedrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthtrial |