Cargando…
In Vitro Evaluation of Biomaterials for Vocal Fold Injection: A Systematic Review
Vocal fold injection is a preferred treatment in glottic insufficiency because it is relatively quick and cost-saving. However, researchers have yet to discover the ideal biomaterial with properties suitable for human vocal fold application. The current systematic review employing PRISMA guidelines...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34451158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162619 |
_version_ | 1783745254573211648 |
---|---|
author | Wan-Chiew, Ng Baki, Marina Mat Fauzi, Mh Busra Lokanathan, Yogeswaran Azman, Mawaddah |
author_facet | Wan-Chiew, Ng Baki, Marina Mat Fauzi, Mh Busra Lokanathan, Yogeswaran Azman, Mawaddah |
author_sort | Wan-Chiew, Ng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vocal fold injection is a preferred treatment in glottic insufficiency because it is relatively quick and cost-saving. However, researchers have yet to discover the ideal biomaterial with properties suitable for human vocal fold application. The current systematic review employing PRISMA guidelines summarizes and discusses the available evidence related to outcome measures used to characterize novel biomaterials in the development phase. The literature search of related articles published within January 2010 to March 2021 was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), Google Scholar and PubMed databases. The search identified 6240 potentially relevant records, which were screened and appraised to include 15 relevant articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The current study highlights that the characterization methods were inconsistent throughout the different studies. While rheologic outcome measures (viscosity, elasticity and shear) were most widely utilized, there appear to be no target or reference values. Outcome measures such as cellular response and biodegradation should be prioritized as they could mitigate the clinical drawbacks of currently available biomaterials. The review suggests future studies to prioritize characterization of the viscoelasticity (to improve voice outcomes), inflammatory response (to reduce side effects) and biodegradation (to improve longevity) profiles of newly developed biomaterials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8400183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84001832021-08-29 In Vitro Evaluation of Biomaterials for Vocal Fold Injection: A Systematic Review Wan-Chiew, Ng Baki, Marina Mat Fauzi, Mh Busra Lokanathan, Yogeswaran Azman, Mawaddah Polymers (Basel) Review Vocal fold injection is a preferred treatment in glottic insufficiency because it is relatively quick and cost-saving. However, researchers have yet to discover the ideal biomaterial with properties suitable for human vocal fold application. The current systematic review employing PRISMA guidelines summarizes and discusses the available evidence related to outcome measures used to characterize novel biomaterials in the development phase. The literature search of related articles published within January 2010 to March 2021 was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), Google Scholar and PubMed databases. The search identified 6240 potentially relevant records, which were screened and appraised to include 15 relevant articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The current study highlights that the characterization methods were inconsistent throughout the different studies. While rheologic outcome measures (viscosity, elasticity and shear) were most widely utilized, there appear to be no target or reference values. Outcome measures such as cellular response and biodegradation should be prioritized as they could mitigate the clinical drawbacks of currently available biomaterials. The review suggests future studies to prioritize characterization of the viscoelasticity (to improve voice outcomes), inflammatory response (to reduce side effects) and biodegradation (to improve longevity) profiles of newly developed biomaterials. MDPI 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8400183/ /pubmed/34451158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162619 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Wan-Chiew, Ng Baki, Marina Mat Fauzi, Mh Busra Lokanathan, Yogeswaran Azman, Mawaddah In Vitro Evaluation of Biomaterials for Vocal Fold Injection: A Systematic Review |
title | In Vitro Evaluation of Biomaterials for Vocal Fold Injection: A Systematic Review |
title_full | In Vitro Evaluation of Biomaterials for Vocal Fold Injection: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | In Vitro Evaluation of Biomaterials for Vocal Fold Injection: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro Evaluation of Biomaterials for Vocal Fold Injection: A Systematic Review |
title_short | In Vitro Evaluation of Biomaterials for Vocal Fold Injection: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | in vitro evaluation of biomaterials for vocal fold injection: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34451158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162619 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanchiewng invitroevaluationofbiomaterialsforvocalfoldinjectionasystematicreview AT bakimarinamat invitroevaluationofbiomaterialsforvocalfoldinjectionasystematicreview AT fauzimhbusra invitroevaluationofbiomaterialsforvocalfoldinjectionasystematicreview AT lokanathanyogeswaran invitroevaluationofbiomaterialsforvocalfoldinjectionasystematicreview AT azmanmawaddah invitroevaluationofbiomaterialsforvocalfoldinjectionasystematicreview |