Cargando…

The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study

There is no consensus in the literature regarding the potential toxicity of universal dental adhesives (UDA). Being used in close proximity to the pulp, their biocompatibility should be an important factor in dental research. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of UDA i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam, Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta, Galita, Grzegorz, Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika, Lapinska, Barbara, Sokolowski, Jerzy, Majsterek, Ireneusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34451192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162653
_version_ 1783745323921833984
author Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam
Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta
Galita, Grzegorz
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Lapinska, Barbara
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Majsterek, Ireneusz
author_facet Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam
Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta
Galita, Grzegorz
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Lapinska, Barbara
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Majsterek, Ireneusz
author_sort Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam
collection PubMed
description There is no consensus in the literature regarding the potential toxicity of universal dental adhesives (UDA). Being used in close proximity to the pulp, their biocompatibility should be an important factor in dental research. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of UDA in an in vitro model. The study was performed using a monocyte/macrophage peripheral blood SC cell line (ATCC CRL-9855) on four specific UDA, namely: All-Bond Universal (Bisco); CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray); G-Premio BOND (GC); Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE). The cytotoxicity of the investigated UDA was measured using the XTT colorimetric assay. The genotoxicity of the analyzed compounds was evaluated using an alkaline version of the comet assay. Furthermore, flow cytometry (FC) apoptosis detection was performed using the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I. FC cell-cycle arrest assessment was performed using propidium iodide staining. The study observed significant differences in the toxicity of the UDA that were tested, as G-Premio BOND showed significant in vitro toxicity in all of the tests performed, while All-Bond Universal, CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick and Single Bond Universal did not present any significant toxic effects toward SC cell line. The in vitro toxicity of UDA should be taken into consideration prior to in vivo and clinical studies. The flow cytometry could improve the accuracy of dental materials research and should be incorporated into the standardization criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8400476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84004762021-08-29 The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta Galita, Grzegorz Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika Lapinska, Barbara Sokolowski, Jerzy Majsterek, Ireneusz Polymers (Basel) Article There is no consensus in the literature regarding the potential toxicity of universal dental adhesives (UDA). Being used in close proximity to the pulp, their biocompatibility should be an important factor in dental research. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of UDA in an in vitro model. The study was performed using a monocyte/macrophage peripheral blood SC cell line (ATCC CRL-9855) on four specific UDA, namely: All-Bond Universal (Bisco); CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray); G-Premio BOND (GC); Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE). The cytotoxicity of the investigated UDA was measured using the XTT colorimetric assay. The genotoxicity of the analyzed compounds was evaluated using an alkaline version of the comet assay. Furthermore, flow cytometry (FC) apoptosis detection was performed using the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I. FC cell-cycle arrest assessment was performed using propidium iodide staining. The study observed significant differences in the toxicity of the UDA that were tested, as G-Premio BOND showed significant in vitro toxicity in all of the tests performed, while All-Bond Universal, CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick and Single Bond Universal did not present any significant toxic effects toward SC cell line. The in vitro toxicity of UDA should be taken into consideration prior to in vivo and clinical studies. The flow cytometry could improve the accuracy of dental materials research and should be incorporated into the standardization criteria. MDPI 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8400476/ /pubmed/34451192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162653 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam
Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta
Galita, Grzegorz
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Lapinska, Barbara
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Majsterek, Ireneusz
The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study
title The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study
title_full The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study
title_short The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study
title_sort toxicity of universal dental adhesives: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34451192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162653
work_keys_str_mv AT wawrzynkiewiczadam thetoxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT rozpedekkaminskawioletta thetoxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT galitagrzegorz thetoxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT lukomskaszymanskamonika thetoxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT lapinskabarbara thetoxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT sokolowskijerzy thetoxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT majsterekireneusz thetoxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT wawrzynkiewiczadam toxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT rozpedekkaminskawioletta toxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT galitagrzegorz toxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT lukomskaszymanskamonika toxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT lapinskabarbara toxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT sokolowskijerzy toxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT majsterekireneusz toxicityofuniversaldentaladhesivesaninvitrostudy