Cargando…
Impact Response and Damage Tolerance of Hybrid Glass/Kevlar-Fibre Epoxy Structural Composites
The present study is aimed at investigating the effect of hybridisation on Kevlar/E-Glass based epoxy composite laminate structures. Composites with 3 mm thickness and 16 layers of fibre (14 layers of E-glass centred and 2 outer layers of Kevlar) were fabricated using compression moulding technique....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34451131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162591 |
_version_ | 1783745338137378816 |
---|---|
author | Alagumalai, Vasudevan Shanmugam, Vigneshwaran Balasubramanian, Navin Kumar Krishnamoorthy, Yoganandam Ganesan, Velmurugan Försth, Michael Sas, Gabriel Berto, Filippo Chanda, Avishek Das, Oisik |
author_facet | Alagumalai, Vasudevan Shanmugam, Vigneshwaran Balasubramanian, Navin Kumar Krishnamoorthy, Yoganandam Ganesan, Velmurugan Försth, Michael Sas, Gabriel Berto, Filippo Chanda, Avishek Das, Oisik |
author_sort | Alagumalai, Vasudevan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study is aimed at investigating the effect of hybridisation on Kevlar/E-Glass based epoxy composite laminate structures. Composites with 3 mm thickness and 16 layers of fibre (14 layers of E-glass centred and 2 outer layers of Kevlar) were fabricated using compression moulding technique. The fibre orientation of the Kevlar layers had 3 variations (0, 45 and 60°), whereas the E-glass fibre layers were maintained at 0° orientation. Tensile, flexural, impact (Charpy and Izod), interlaminar shear strength and ballistic impact tests were conducted. The ballistic test was performed using a gas gun with spherical hard body projectiles at the projectile velocity of 170 m/s. The pre- and post-impact velocities of the projectiles were measured using a high-speed camera. The energy absorbed by the composite laminates was further reported during the ballistic test, and a computerised tomographic scan was used to analyse the impact damage. The composites with 45° fibre orientation of Kevlar fibres showed better tensile strength, flexural strength, Charpy impact strength, and energy absorption. The energy absorbed by the composites with 45° fibre orientation was 58.68 J, which was 14% and 22% higher than the 0° and 60° oriented composites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8400536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84005362021-08-29 Impact Response and Damage Tolerance of Hybrid Glass/Kevlar-Fibre Epoxy Structural Composites Alagumalai, Vasudevan Shanmugam, Vigneshwaran Balasubramanian, Navin Kumar Krishnamoorthy, Yoganandam Ganesan, Velmurugan Försth, Michael Sas, Gabriel Berto, Filippo Chanda, Avishek Das, Oisik Polymers (Basel) Article The present study is aimed at investigating the effect of hybridisation on Kevlar/E-Glass based epoxy composite laminate structures. Composites with 3 mm thickness and 16 layers of fibre (14 layers of E-glass centred and 2 outer layers of Kevlar) were fabricated using compression moulding technique. The fibre orientation of the Kevlar layers had 3 variations (0, 45 and 60°), whereas the E-glass fibre layers were maintained at 0° orientation. Tensile, flexural, impact (Charpy and Izod), interlaminar shear strength and ballistic impact tests were conducted. The ballistic test was performed using a gas gun with spherical hard body projectiles at the projectile velocity of 170 m/s. The pre- and post-impact velocities of the projectiles were measured using a high-speed camera. The energy absorbed by the composite laminates was further reported during the ballistic test, and a computerised tomographic scan was used to analyse the impact damage. The composites with 45° fibre orientation of Kevlar fibres showed better tensile strength, flexural strength, Charpy impact strength, and energy absorption. The energy absorbed by the composites with 45° fibre orientation was 58.68 J, which was 14% and 22% higher than the 0° and 60° oriented composites. MDPI 2021-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8400536/ /pubmed/34451131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162591 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Alagumalai, Vasudevan Shanmugam, Vigneshwaran Balasubramanian, Navin Kumar Krishnamoorthy, Yoganandam Ganesan, Velmurugan Försth, Michael Sas, Gabriel Berto, Filippo Chanda, Avishek Das, Oisik Impact Response and Damage Tolerance of Hybrid Glass/Kevlar-Fibre Epoxy Structural Composites |
title | Impact Response and Damage Tolerance of Hybrid Glass/Kevlar-Fibre Epoxy Structural Composites |
title_full | Impact Response and Damage Tolerance of Hybrid Glass/Kevlar-Fibre Epoxy Structural Composites |
title_fullStr | Impact Response and Damage Tolerance of Hybrid Glass/Kevlar-Fibre Epoxy Structural Composites |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact Response and Damage Tolerance of Hybrid Glass/Kevlar-Fibre Epoxy Structural Composites |
title_short | Impact Response and Damage Tolerance of Hybrid Glass/Kevlar-Fibre Epoxy Structural Composites |
title_sort | impact response and damage tolerance of hybrid glass/kevlar-fibre epoxy structural composites |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34451131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13162591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alagumalaivasudevan impactresponseanddamagetoleranceofhybridglasskevlarfibreepoxystructuralcomposites AT shanmugamvigneshwaran impactresponseanddamagetoleranceofhybridglasskevlarfibreepoxystructuralcomposites AT balasubramaniannavinkumar impactresponseanddamagetoleranceofhybridglasskevlarfibreepoxystructuralcomposites AT krishnamoorthyyoganandam impactresponseanddamagetoleranceofhybridglasskevlarfibreepoxystructuralcomposites AT ganesanvelmurugan impactresponseanddamagetoleranceofhybridglasskevlarfibreepoxystructuralcomposites AT forsthmichael impactresponseanddamagetoleranceofhybridglasskevlarfibreepoxystructuralcomposites AT sasgabriel impactresponseanddamagetoleranceofhybridglasskevlarfibreepoxystructuralcomposites AT bertofilippo impactresponseanddamagetoleranceofhybridglasskevlarfibreepoxystructuralcomposites AT chandaavishek impactresponseanddamagetoleranceofhybridglasskevlarfibreepoxystructuralcomposites AT dasoisik impactresponseanddamagetoleranceofhybridglasskevlarfibreepoxystructuralcomposites |