Cargando…

Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis

BACKGROUND: To provide value-based care for patients with multi-morbidity, innovative integrated care programmes and comprehensive evaluations of such programmes are required. In Norway, a new programme called “Holistic Continuity of Patient Care” (HCPC) addresses the issue of multi-morbidity by pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Islam, M. Kamrul, Ruths, Sabine, Jansen, Kristian, Falck, Runa, Mölken, Maureen Rutten-van, Askildsen, Jan Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06805-6
_version_ 1783745389932838912
author Islam, M. Kamrul
Ruths, Sabine
Jansen, Kristian
Falck, Runa
Mölken, Maureen Rutten-van
Askildsen, Jan Erik
author_facet Islam, M. Kamrul
Ruths, Sabine
Jansen, Kristian
Falck, Runa
Mölken, Maureen Rutten-van
Askildsen, Jan Erik
author_sort Islam, M. Kamrul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To provide value-based care for patients with multi-morbidity, innovative integrated care programmes and comprehensive evaluations of such programmes are required. In Norway, a new programme called “Holistic Continuity of Patient Care” (HCPC) addresses the issue of multi-morbidity by providing integrated care within learning networks for frail elderly patients who receive municipal home care services or a short-term stay in a nursing home. This study conducts a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to evaluate whether the HCPC programme performs better on a large set of outcomes corresponding to the ‘triple aim’ compared to usual care. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal survey data were collected at baseline and follow-up after 6-months. The assessment of HCPC was implemented by a novel MCDA framework. The relative weights of importance of the outcomes used in the MCDA were obtained from a discrete choice experiment among five different groups of stakeholders. The performance score was estimated using a quasi-experimental design and linear mixed methods. Performance scores were standardized and multiplied by their weights of importance to obtain the overall MCDA value by stakeholder group. RESULTS: At baseline in the HCPC and usual care groups, respectively, 120 and 89 patients responded, of whom 87 and 41 responded at follow-up. The average age at baseline was 80.0 years for HCPC and 83.6 for usual care. Matching reduced the standardized differences between the groups for patient background characteristics and outcome variables. The MCDA results indicated that HCPC was preferred to usual care irrespective of stakeholders. The better performance of HCPC was mostly driven by improvements in enjoyment of life, psychological well-being, and social relationships and participation. Results were consistent with sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulation. CONCLUSION: Frail elderly with multi-morbidity represent complex health problems at large costs for society in terms of health- and social care. This study is a novel contribution to assessing and understanding HCPC programme performance respecting the multi-dimensionality of desired outcomes. Integrated care programmes like HCPC may improve well-being of patients, be cost-saving, and contribute to the pursuit of evidence based gradual reforms in the care of frail elderly. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06805-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8400755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84007552021-08-30 Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis Islam, M. Kamrul Ruths, Sabine Jansen, Kristian Falck, Runa Mölken, Maureen Rutten-van Askildsen, Jan Erik BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: To provide value-based care for patients with multi-morbidity, innovative integrated care programmes and comprehensive evaluations of such programmes are required. In Norway, a new programme called “Holistic Continuity of Patient Care” (HCPC) addresses the issue of multi-morbidity by providing integrated care within learning networks for frail elderly patients who receive municipal home care services or a short-term stay in a nursing home. This study conducts a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to evaluate whether the HCPC programme performs better on a large set of outcomes corresponding to the ‘triple aim’ compared to usual care. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal survey data were collected at baseline and follow-up after 6-months. The assessment of HCPC was implemented by a novel MCDA framework. The relative weights of importance of the outcomes used in the MCDA were obtained from a discrete choice experiment among five different groups of stakeholders. The performance score was estimated using a quasi-experimental design and linear mixed methods. Performance scores were standardized and multiplied by their weights of importance to obtain the overall MCDA value by stakeholder group. RESULTS: At baseline in the HCPC and usual care groups, respectively, 120 and 89 patients responded, of whom 87 and 41 responded at follow-up. The average age at baseline was 80.0 years for HCPC and 83.6 for usual care. Matching reduced the standardized differences between the groups for patient background characteristics and outcome variables. The MCDA results indicated that HCPC was preferred to usual care irrespective of stakeholders. The better performance of HCPC was mostly driven by improvements in enjoyment of life, psychological well-being, and social relationships and participation. Results were consistent with sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulation. CONCLUSION: Frail elderly with multi-morbidity represent complex health problems at large costs for society in terms of health- and social care. This study is a novel contribution to assessing and understanding HCPC programme performance respecting the multi-dimensionality of desired outcomes. Integrated care programmes like HCPC may improve well-being of patients, be cost-saving, and contribute to the pursuit of evidence based gradual reforms in the care of frail elderly. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06805-6. BioMed Central 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8400755/ /pubmed/34454494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06805-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Islam, M. Kamrul
Ruths, Sabine
Jansen, Kristian
Falck, Runa
Mölken, Maureen Rutten-van
Askildsen, Jan Erik
Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis
title Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis
title_full Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis
title_short Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis
title_sort evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in norway using multi-criteria decision analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06805-6
work_keys_str_mv AT islammkamrul evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT ruthssabine evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT jansenkristian evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT falckruna evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT molkenmaureenruttenvan evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT askildsenjanerik evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis