Cargando…
Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis
BACKGROUND: To provide value-based care for patients with multi-morbidity, innovative integrated care programmes and comprehensive evaluations of such programmes are required. In Norway, a new programme called “Holistic Continuity of Patient Care” (HCPC) addresses the issue of multi-morbidity by pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06805-6 |
_version_ | 1783745389932838912 |
---|---|
author | Islam, M. Kamrul Ruths, Sabine Jansen, Kristian Falck, Runa Mölken, Maureen Rutten-van Askildsen, Jan Erik |
author_facet | Islam, M. Kamrul Ruths, Sabine Jansen, Kristian Falck, Runa Mölken, Maureen Rutten-van Askildsen, Jan Erik |
author_sort | Islam, M. Kamrul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To provide value-based care for patients with multi-morbidity, innovative integrated care programmes and comprehensive evaluations of such programmes are required. In Norway, a new programme called “Holistic Continuity of Patient Care” (HCPC) addresses the issue of multi-morbidity by providing integrated care within learning networks for frail elderly patients who receive municipal home care services or a short-term stay in a nursing home. This study conducts a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to evaluate whether the HCPC programme performs better on a large set of outcomes corresponding to the ‘triple aim’ compared to usual care. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal survey data were collected at baseline and follow-up after 6-months. The assessment of HCPC was implemented by a novel MCDA framework. The relative weights of importance of the outcomes used in the MCDA were obtained from a discrete choice experiment among five different groups of stakeholders. The performance score was estimated using a quasi-experimental design and linear mixed methods. Performance scores were standardized and multiplied by their weights of importance to obtain the overall MCDA value by stakeholder group. RESULTS: At baseline in the HCPC and usual care groups, respectively, 120 and 89 patients responded, of whom 87 and 41 responded at follow-up. The average age at baseline was 80.0 years for HCPC and 83.6 for usual care. Matching reduced the standardized differences between the groups for patient background characteristics and outcome variables. The MCDA results indicated that HCPC was preferred to usual care irrespective of stakeholders. The better performance of HCPC was mostly driven by improvements in enjoyment of life, psychological well-being, and social relationships and participation. Results were consistent with sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulation. CONCLUSION: Frail elderly with multi-morbidity represent complex health problems at large costs for society in terms of health- and social care. This study is a novel contribution to assessing and understanding HCPC programme performance respecting the multi-dimensionality of desired outcomes. Integrated care programmes like HCPC may improve well-being of patients, be cost-saving, and contribute to the pursuit of evidence based gradual reforms in the care of frail elderly. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06805-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8400755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84007552021-08-30 Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis Islam, M. Kamrul Ruths, Sabine Jansen, Kristian Falck, Runa Mölken, Maureen Rutten-van Askildsen, Jan Erik BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: To provide value-based care for patients with multi-morbidity, innovative integrated care programmes and comprehensive evaluations of such programmes are required. In Norway, a new programme called “Holistic Continuity of Patient Care” (HCPC) addresses the issue of multi-morbidity by providing integrated care within learning networks for frail elderly patients who receive municipal home care services or a short-term stay in a nursing home. This study conducts a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to evaluate whether the HCPC programme performs better on a large set of outcomes corresponding to the ‘triple aim’ compared to usual care. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal survey data were collected at baseline and follow-up after 6-months. The assessment of HCPC was implemented by a novel MCDA framework. The relative weights of importance of the outcomes used in the MCDA were obtained from a discrete choice experiment among five different groups of stakeholders. The performance score was estimated using a quasi-experimental design and linear mixed methods. Performance scores were standardized and multiplied by their weights of importance to obtain the overall MCDA value by stakeholder group. RESULTS: At baseline in the HCPC and usual care groups, respectively, 120 and 89 patients responded, of whom 87 and 41 responded at follow-up. The average age at baseline was 80.0 years for HCPC and 83.6 for usual care. Matching reduced the standardized differences between the groups for patient background characteristics and outcome variables. The MCDA results indicated that HCPC was preferred to usual care irrespective of stakeholders. The better performance of HCPC was mostly driven by improvements in enjoyment of life, psychological well-being, and social relationships and participation. Results were consistent with sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulation. CONCLUSION: Frail elderly with multi-morbidity represent complex health problems at large costs for society in terms of health- and social care. This study is a novel contribution to assessing and understanding HCPC programme performance respecting the multi-dimensionality of desired outcomes. Integrated care programmes like HCPC may improve well-being of patients, be cost-saving, and contribute to the pursuit of evidence based gradual reforms in the care of frail elderly. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06805-6. BioMed Central 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8400755/ /pubmed/34454494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06805-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Islam, M. Kamrul Ruths, Sabine Jansen, Kristian Falck, Runa Mölken, Maureen Rutten-van Askildsen, Jan Erik Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis |
title | Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis |
title_full | Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis |
title_short | Evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in Norway using multi-criteria decision analysis |
title_sort | evaluating an integrated care pathway for frail elderly patients in norway using multi-criteria decision analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06805-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT islammkamrul evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT ruthssabine evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT jansenkristian evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT falckruna evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT molkenmaureenruttenvan evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT askildsenjanerik evaluatinganintegratedcarepathwayforfrailelderlypatientsinnorwayusingmulticriteriadecisionanalysis |