Cargando…

Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review

Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is an ultrasound technique that tends to be increasingly used as a supplementary technique in the evaluation of patients with dense glandular breasts. Patients with dense breasts have an increased risk of developing breast cancer compared to patients with fatty bre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boca (Bene), Ioana, Ciurea, Anca Ileana, Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta, Dudea, Sorin Marian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34442347
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080703
_version_ 1783745435799650304
author Boca (Bene), Ioana
Ciurea, Anca Ileana
Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta
Dudea, Sorin Marian
author_facet Boca (Bene), Ioana
Ciurea, Anca Ileana
Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta
Dudea, Sorin Marian
author_sort Boca (Bene), Ioana
collection PubMed
description Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is an ultrasound technique that tends to be increasingly used as a supplementary technique in the evaluation of patients with dense glandular breasts. Patients with dense breasts have an increased risk of developing breast cancer compared to patients with fatty breasts. Furthermore, for this group of patients, mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting breast cancers, especially if it is not associated with architectural distortion or calcifications. ABUS is a standardized examination with many advantages in both screening and diagnostic settings: it increases the detection rate of breast cancer, improves the workflow, and reduces the examination time. On the other hand, like any imaging technique, ABUS has disadvantages and even some limitations. Many disadvantages can be diminished by additional attention and training. Disadvantages regarding image acquisition are the inability to assess the axilla, the vascularization, and the elasticity of a lesion, while concerning the interpretation, the disadvantages are the artifacts due to poor positioning, lack of contact, motion or lesion related. This article reviews and discusses the indications, the advantages, and disadvantages of the method and also the sources of error in the ABUS examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8400952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84009522021-08-29 Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review Boca (Bene), Ioana Ciurea, Anca Ileana Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta Dudea, Sorin Marian J Pers Med Review Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is an ultrasound technique that tends to be increasingly used as a supplementary technique in the evaluation of patients with dense glandular breasts. Patients with dense breasts have an increased risk of developing breast cancer compared to patients with fatty breasts. Furthermore, for this group of patients, mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting breast cancers, especially if it is not associated with architectural distortion or calcifications. ABUS is a standardized examination with many advantages in both screening and diagnostic settings: it increases the detection rate of breast cancer, improves the workflow, and reduces the examination time. On the other hand, like any imaging technique, ABUS has disadvantages and even some limitations. Many disadvantages can be diminished by additional attention and training. Disadvantages regarding image acquisition are the inability to assess the axilla, the vascularization, and the elasticity of a lesion, while concerning the interpretation, the disadvantages are the artifacts due to poor positioning, lack of contact, motion or lesion related. This article reviews and discusses the indications, the advantages, and disadvantages of the method and also the sources of error in the ABUS examination. MDPI 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8400952/ /pubmed/34442347 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080703 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Boca (Bene), Ioana
Ciurea, Anca Ileana
Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta
Dudea, Sorin Marian
Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review
title Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review
title_full Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review
title_short Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review
title_sort pros and cons for automated breast ultrasound (abus): a narrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34442347
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080703
work_keys_str_mv AT bocabeneioana prosandconsforautomatedbreastultrasoundabusanarrativereview
AT ciureaancaileana prosandconsforautomatedbreastultrasoundabusanarrativereview
AT ciorteacristianaaugusta prosandconsforautomatedbreastultrasoundabusanarrativereview
AT dudeasorinmarian prosandconsforautomatedbreastultrasoundabusanarrativereview