Cargando…
Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review
Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is an ultrasound technique that tends to be increasingly used as a supplementary technique in the evaluation of patients with dense glandular breasts. Patients with dense breasts have an increased risk of developing breast cancer compared to patients with fatty bre...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34442347 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080703 |
_version_ | 1783745435799650304 |
---|---|
author | Boca (Bene), Ioana Ciurea, Anca Ileana Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta Dudea, Sorin Marian |
author_facet | Boca (Bene), Ioana Ciurea, Anca Ileana Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta Dudea, Sorin Marian |
author_sort | Boca (Bene), Ioana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is an ultrasound technique that tends to be increasingly used as a supplementary technique in the evaluation of patients with dense glandular breasts. Patients with dense breasts have an increased risk of developing breast cancer compared to patients with fatty breasts. Furthermore, for this group of patients, mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting breast cancers, especially if it is not associated with architectural distortion or calcifications. ABUS is a standardized examination with many advantages in both screening and diagnostic settings: it increases the detection rate of breast cancer, improves the workflow, and reduces the examination time. On the other hand, like any imaging technique, ABUS has disadvantages and even some limitations. Many disadvantages can be diminished by additional attention and training. Disadvantages regarding image acquisition are the inability to assess the axilla, the vascularization, and the elasticity of a lesion, while concerning the interpretation, the disadvantages are the artifacts due to poor positioning, lack of contact, motion or lesion related. This article reviews and discusses the indications, the advantages, and disadvantages of the method and also the sources of error in the ABUS examination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8400952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84009522021-08-29 Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review Boca (Bene), Ioana Ciurea, Anca Ileana Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta Dudea, Sorin Marian J Pers Med Review Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is an ultrasound technique that tends to be increasingly used as a supplementary technique in the evaluation of patients with dense glandular breasts. Patients with dense breasts have an increased risk of developing breast cancer compared to patients with fatty breasts. Furthermore, for this group of patients, mammography has a low sensitivity in detecting breast cancers, especially if it is not associated with architectural distortion or calcifications. ABUS is a standardized examination with many advantages in both screening and diagnostic settings: it increases the detection rate of breast cancer, improves the workflow, and reduces the examination time. On the other hand, like any imaging technique, ABUS has disadvantages and even some limitations. Many disadvantages can be diminished by additional attention and training. Disadvantages regarding image acquisition are the inability to assess the axilla, the vascularization, and the elasticity of a lesion, while concerning the interpretation, the disadvantages are the artifacts due to poor positioning, lack of contact, motion or lesion related. This article reviews and discusses the indications, the advantages, and disadvantages of the method and also the sources of error in the ABUS examination. MDPI 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8400952/ /pubmed/34442347 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080703 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Boca (Bene), Ioana Ciurea, Anca Ileana Ciortea, Cristiana Augusta Dudea, Sorin Marian Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review |
title | Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review |
title_full | Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review |
title_short | Pros and Cons for Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS): A Narrative Review |
title_sort | pros and cons for automated breast ultrasound (abus): a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34442347 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080703 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bocabeneioana prosandconsforautomatedbreastultrasoundabusanarrativereview AT ciureaancaileana prosandconsforautomatedbreastultrasoundabusanarrativereview AT ciorteacristianaaugusta prosandconsforautomatedbreastultrasoundabusanarrativereview AT dudeasorinmarian prosandconsforautomatedbreastultrasoundabusanarrativereview |