Cargando…

Gait Analysis Accuracy Difference with Different Dimensions of Flexible Capacitance Sensors

Stroke causes neurological pathologies, including gait pathologies, which are diagnosed by gait analysis. However, existing gait analysis devices are difficult to use in situ or are disrupted by external conditions. To overcome these drawbacks, a flexible capacitance sensor was developed in this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nam, DongWoo, Ahn, Bummo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34450739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165299
_version_ 1783745455509733376
author Nam, DongWoo
Ahn, Bummo
author_facet Nam, DongWoo
Ahn, Bummo
author_sort Nam, DongWoo
collection PubMed
description Stroke causes neurological pathologies, including gait pathologies, which are diagnosed by gait analysis. However, existing gait analysis devices are difficult to use in situ or are disrupted by external conditions. To overcome these drawbacks, a flexible capacitance sensor was developed in this study. To date, a performance comparison of flexible sensors with different dimensions has not been carried out. The aim of this study was to provide optimized sensor dimension information for gait analysis. To accomplish this, sensors with seven different dimensions were fabricated. The dimensions of the sensors were based on the average body size and movement range of 20- to 59-year-old adults. The sensors were characterized by 100 oscillations. The minimum hysteresis error was 8%. After that, four subjects were equipped with the sensor and walked on a treadmill at a speed of 3.6 km/h. All walking processes were filmed at 50 fps and analyzed in Kinovea. The RMS error was calculated using the same frame rate of the video and the sampling rate of the signal from the sensor. The smallest RMS error between the sensor data and the ankle angle was 3.13° using the 49 × 8 mm sensor. In this study, we confirm the dimensions of the sensor with the highest gait analysis accuracy; therefore, the results can be used to make decisions regarding sensor dimensions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8401030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84010302021-08-29 Gait Analysis Accuracy Difference with Different Dimensions of Flexible Capacitance Sensors Nam, DongWoo Ahn, Bummo Sensors (Basel) Article Stroke causes neurological pathologies, including gait pathologies, which are diagnosed by gait analysis. However, existing gait analysis devices are difficult to use in situ or are disrupted by external conditions. To overcome these drawbacks, a flexible capacitance sensor was developed in this study. To date, a performance comparison of flexible sensors with different dimensions has not been carried out. The aim of this study was to provide optimized sensor dimension information for gait analysis. To accomplish this, sensors with seven different dimensions were fabricated. The dimensions of the sensors were based on the average body size and movement range of 20- to 59-year-old adults. The sensors were characterized by 100 oscillations. The minimum hysteresis error was 8%. After that, four subjects were equipped with the sensor and walked on a treadmill at a speed of 3.6 km/h. All walking processes were filmed at 50 fps and analyzed in Kinovea. The RMS error was calculated using the same frame rate of the video and the sampling rate of the signal from the sensor. The smallest RMS error between the sensor data and the ankle angle was 3.13° using the 49 × 8 mm sensor. In this study, we confirm the dimensions of the sensor with the highest gait analysis accuracy; therefore, the results can be used to make decisions regarding sensor dimensions. MDPI 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8401030/ /pubmed/34450739 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165299 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nam, DongWoo
Ahn, Bummo
Gait Analysis Accuracy Difference with Different Dimensions of Flexible Capacitance Sensors
title Gait Analysis Accuracy Difference with Different Dimensions of Flexible Capacitance Sensors
title_full Gait Analysis Accuracy Difference with Different Dimensions of Flexible Capacitance Sensors
title_fullStr Gait Analysis Accuracy Difference with Different Dimensions of Flexible Capacitance Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Gait Analysis Accuracy Difference with Different Dimensions of Flexible Capacitance Sensors
title_short Gait Analysis Accuracy Difference with Different Dimensions of Flexible Capacitance Sensors
title_sort gait analysis accuracy difference with different dimensions of flexible capacitance sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34450739
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165299
work_keys_str_mv AT namdongwoo gaitanalysisaccuracydifferencewithdifferentdimensionsofflexiblecapacitancesensors
AT ahnbummo gaitanalysisaccuracydifferencewithdifferentdimensionsofflexiblecapacitancesensors