Cargando…

Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness

People with serious mental illness (SMI) experience challenges that may make typical dietary assessment methods less feasible and accurate. This study aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary validity of a 3-day photographic food record (PR), a 1-day food diary (FD) and a 1-d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra, Teasdale, Scott B., Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem, Moerkl, Sabrina, Prinz, Nicole, Becker, Thomas, Kilian, Reinhold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13082862
_version_ 1783745491190677504
author Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra
Teasdale, Scott B.
Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem
Moerkl, Sabrina
Prinz, Nicole
Becker, Thomas
Kilian, Reinhold
author_facet Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra
Teasdale, Scott B.
Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem
Moerkl, Sabrina
Prinz, Nicole
Becker, Thomas
Kilian, Reinhold
author_sort Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra
collection PubMed
description People with serious mental illness (SMI) experience challenges that may make typical dietary assessment methods less feasible and accurate. This study aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary validity of a 3-day photographic food record (PR), a 1-day food diary (FD) and a 1-day weighed food protocol (WR) in people with SMI. Participants completed measures at two timepoints, with a 4-week interval. Feasibility and acceptability for each method were measured through four outcomes: percent of completers, quality assessment, number of participants requiring technical devices and satisfaction questionnaire. Relative validity was measured by agreement in estimated energy intake between methods, using Bland–Altman analysis and WR as the benchmark, and prevalence of misreporting, using the Goldberg cut-off method, updated by Black. In total, 63 participants were recruited, with a dropout rate of 19.0% prior to timepoint 1 and additional 6.4% prior to timepoint 2. Quality deficits were identified for all methods. The FD was most acceptable to participants, followed by the PR. The difference in estimated energy intake between assessment methods was not statistically significant, though there was considerable individual variability. Underreporting was considerable across all methods but appeared highest in the PR. A FD and PR present as feasible and acceptable methods for assessing dietary intake in people with SMI. Further validity testing is required. In addition, clear guidance for completion and removal of potential barriers is required for participants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8401183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84011832021-08-29 Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Teasdale, Scott B. Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem Moerkl, Sabrina Prinz, Nicole Becker, Thomas Kilian, Reinhold Nutrients Article People with serious mental illness (SMI) experience challenges that may make typical dietary assessment methods less feasible and accurate. This study aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary validity of a 3-day photographic food record (PR), a 1-day food diary (FD) and a 1-day weighed food protocol (WR) in people with SMI. Participants completed measures at two timepoints, with a 4-week interval. Feasibility and acceptability for each method were measured through four outcomes: percent of completers, quality assessment, number of participants requiring technical devices and satisfaction questionnaire. Relative validity was measured by agreement in estimated energy intake between methods, using Bland–Altman analysis and WR as the benchmark, and prevalence of misreporting, using the Goldberg cut-off method, updated by Black. In total, 63 participants were recruited, with a dropout rate of 19.0% prior to timepoint 1 and additional 6.4% prior to timepoint 2. Quality deficits were identified for all methods. The FD was most acceptable to participants, followed by the PR. The difference in estimated energy intake between assessment methods was not statistically significant, though there was considerable individual variability. Underreporting was considerable across all methods but appeared highest in the PR. A FD and PR present as feasible and acceptable methods for assessing dietary intake in people with SMI. Further validity testing is required. In addition, clear guidance for completion and removal of potential barriers is required for participants. MDPI 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8401183/ /pubmed/34445022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13082862 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra
Teasdale, Scott B.
Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem
Moerkl, Sabrina
Prinz, Nicole
Becker, Thomas
Kilian, Reinhold
Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness
title Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness
title_full Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness
title_fullStr Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness
title_short Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness
title_sort feasibility and acceptability of photographic food record, food diary and weighed food record in people with serious mental illness
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13082862
work_keys_str_mv AT muellerstierlinannabelsandra feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness
AT teasdalescottb feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness
AT dincuemmueguelsuem feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness
AT moerklsabrina feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness
AT prinznicole feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness
AT beckerthomas feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness
AT kilianreinhold feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness