Cargando…
Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness
People with serious mental illness (SMI) experience challenges that may make typical dietary assessment methods less feasible and accurate. This study aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary validity of a 3-day photographic food record (PR), a 1-day food diary (FD) and a 1-d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13082862 |
_version_ | 1783745491190677504 |
---|---|
author | Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Teasdale, Scott B. Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem Moerkl, Sabrina Prinz, Nicole Becker, Thomas Kilian, Reinhold |
author_facet | Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Teasdale, Scott B. Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem Moerkl, Sabrina Prinz, Nicole Becker, Thomas Kilian, Reinhold |
author_sort | Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | People with serious mental illness (SMI) experience challenges that may make typical dietary assessment methods less feasible and accurate. This study aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary validity of a 3-day photographic food record (PR), a 1-day food diary (FD) and a 1-day weighed food protocol (WR) in people with SMI. Participants completed measures at two timepoints, with a 4-week interval. Feasibility and acceptability for each method were measured through four outcomes: percent of completers, quality assessment, number of participants requiring technical devices and satisfaction questionnaire. Relative validity was measured by agreement in estimated energy intake between methods, using Bland–Altman analysis and WR as the benchmark, and prevalence of misreporting, using the Goldberg cut-off method, updated by Black. In total, 63 participants were recruited, with a dropout rate of 19.0% prior to timepoint 1 and additional 6.4% prior to timepoint 2. Quality deficits were identified for all methods. The FD was most acceptable to participants, followed by the PR. The difference in estimated energy intake between assessment methods was not statistically significant, though there was considerable individual variability. Underreporting was considerable across all methods but appeared highest in the PR. A FD and PR present as feasible and acceptable methods for assessing dietary intake in people with SMI. Further validity testing is required. In addition, clear guidance for completion and removal of potential barriers is required for participants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8401183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84011832021-08-29 Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Teasdale, Scott B. Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem Moerkl, Sabrina Prinz, Nicole Becker, Thomas Kilian, Reinhold Nutrients Article People with serious mental illness (SMI) experience challenges that may make typical dietary assessment methods less feasible and accurate. This study aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary validity of a 3-day photographic food record (PR), a 1-day food diary (FD) and a 1-day weighed food protocol (WR) in people with SMI. Participants completed measures at two timepoints, with a 4-week interval. Feasibility and acceptability for each method were measured through four outcomes: percent of completers, quality assessment, number of participants requiring technical devices and satisfaction questionnaire. Relative validity was measured by agreement in estimated energy intake between methods, using Bland–Altman analysis and WR as the benchmark, and prevalence of misreporting, using the Goldberg cut-off method, updated by Black. In total, 63 participants were recruited, with a dropout rate of 19.0% prior to timepoint 1 and additional 6.4% prior to timepoint 2. Quality deficits were identified for all methods. The FD was most acceptable to participants, followed by the PR. The difference in estimated energy intake between assessment methods was not statistically significant, though there was considerable individual variability. Underreporting was considerable across all methods but appeared highest in the PR. A FD and PR present as feasible and acceptable methods for assessing dietary intake in people with SMI. Further validity testing is required. In addition, clear guidance for completion and removal of potential barriers is required for participants. MDPI 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8401183/ /pubmed/34445022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13082862 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Teasdale, Scott B. Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem Moerkl, Sabrina Prinz, Nicole Becker, Thomas Kilian, Reinhold Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness |
title | Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness |
title_full | Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness |
title_short | Feasibility and Acceptability of Photographic Food Record, Food Diary and Weighed Food Record in People with Serious Mental Illness |
title_sort | feasibility and acceptability of photographic food record, food diary and weighed food record in people with serious mental illness |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34445022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13082862 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muellerstierlinannabelsandra feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness AT teasdalescottb feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness AT dincuemmueguelsuem feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness AT moerklsabrina feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness AT prinznicole feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness AT beckerthomas feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness AT kilianreinhold feasibilityandacceptabilityofphotographicfoodrecordfooddiaryandweighedfoodrecordinpeoplewithseriousmentalillness |