Cargando…

Study protocol: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial of the effectiveness of a deliberative loop in identifying implementation strategies for the adoption of a dental sealant guideline in dental clinics

BACKGROUND: The American Dental Association (ADA) recommends dental providers apply dental sealants to the occlusal surfaces of permanent molars for the prevention or treatment of non-cavitated dental caries. Despite the evidence-based support for this guideline, adherence among general dentists is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polk, Deborah E., Guerrero, Erick G., Gruß, Inga, Shah, Nilesh H., Yosuf, Nadia M., Dawson, Tim, Kaplan, Charles D., Pihlstrom, Daniel J., Fellows, Jeffrey L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00199-6
_version_ 1783745503521931264
author Polk, Deborah E.
Guerrero, Erick G.
Gruß, Inga
Shah, Nilesh H.
Yosuf, Nadia M.
Dawson, Tim
Kaplan, Charles D.
Pihlstrom, Daniel J.
Fellows, Jeffrey L.
author_facet Polk, Deborah E.
Guerrero, Erick G.
Gruß, Inga
Shah, Nilesh H.
Yosuf, Nadia M.
Dawson, Tim
Kaplan, Charles D.
Pihlstrom, Daniel J.
Fellows, Jeffrey L.
author_sort Polk, Deborah E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The American Dental Association (ADA) recommends dental providers apply dental sealants to the occlusal surfaces of permanent molars for the prevention or treatment of non-cavitated dental caries. Despite the evidence-based support for this guideline, adherence among general dentists is low, ranging from less than 5 to 38.5%. Thus, an evidence-to-practice gap exists, and it is unclear which implementation strategies would best support providers in adopting and implementing the evidence-based practice. One potential approach to selecting and tailoring implementation strategies is a deliberative loop process, a stakeholder-engaged approach to decision-making. This trial aims to test the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of using a deliberative loop intervention with stakeholders (i.e., providers and staff) to enable managers to select implementation strategies that facilitate the adoption of an evidence-based dental practice. METHODS: Sixteen dental clinics within Kaiser Permanente Northwest Dental will be cluster randomized to determine the timing of receiving the intervention in this stepped-wedge trial. In the three-part deliberative loop intervention, clinic stakeholders engage in the following activities: (1) receive background information, (2) participate in facilitated small-group discussions designed to promote learning from each other’s lived experiences and develop informed opinions about effective clinic-level implementation strategies, and (3) share their informed opinions with clinic leaders, who may then choose to select and deploy implementation strategies based on the stakeholders’ informed opinions. The primary outcome of Reach will be defined as patient-level receipt of guideline-concordant care. Secondary outcomes will include the cost-effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of the deliberative loop process. Implementation strategies deployed will be catalogued over time. DISCUSSION: These results will establish the extent to which the deliberative loop process can help leaders select and tailor implementation strategies with the goal of improving guideline-concordant dental care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID NCT04682730. The trial was first registered on 12/18/2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04682730
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8401236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84012362021-08-30 Study protocol: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial of the effectiveness of a deliberative loop in identifying implementation strategies for the adoption of a dental sealant guideline in dental clinics Polk, Deborah E. Guerrero, Erick G. Gruß, Inga Shah, Nilesh H. Yosuf, Nadia M. Dawson, Tim Kaplan, Charles D. Pihlstrom, Daniel J. Fellows, Jeffrey L. Implement Sci Commun Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The American Dental Association (ADA) recommends dental providers apply dental sealants to the occlusal surfaces of permanent molars for the prevention or treatment of non-cavitated dental caries. Despite the evidence-based support for this guideline, adherence among general dentists is low, ranging from less than 5 to 38.5%. Thus, an evidence-to-practice gap exists, and it is unclear which implementation strategies would best support providers in adopting and implementing the evidence-based practice. One potential approach to selecting and tailoring implementation strategies is a deliberative loop process, a stakeholder-engaged approach to decision-making. This trial aims to test the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of using a deliberative loop intervention with stakeholders (i.e., providers and staff) to enable managers to select implementation strategies that facilitate the adoption of an evidence-based dental practice. METHODS: Sixteen dental clinics within Kaiser Permanente Northwest Dental will be cluster randomized to determine the timing of receiving the intervention in this stepped-wedge trial. In the three-part deliberative loop intervention, clinic stakeholders engage in the following activities: (1) receive background information, (2) participate in facilitated small-group discussions designed to promote learning from each other’s lived experiences and develop informed opinions about effective clinic-level implementation strategies, and (3) share their informed opinions with clinic leaders, who may then choose to select and deploy implementation strategies based on the stakeholders’ informed opinions. The primary outcome of Reach will be defined as patient-level receipt of guideline-concordant care. Secondary outcomes will include the cost-effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of the deliberative loop process. Implementation strategies deployed will be catalogued over time. DISCUSSION: These results will establish the extent to which the deliberative loop process can help leaders select and tailor implementation strategies with the goal of improving guideline-concordant dental care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID NCT04682730. The trial was first registered on 12/18/2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04682730 BioMed Central 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8401236/ /pubmed/34454637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00199-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Polk, Deborah E.
Guerrero, Erick G.
Gruß, Inga
Shah, Nilesh H.
Yosuf, Nadia M.
Dawson, Tim
Kaplan, Charles D.
Pihlstrom, Daniel J.
Fellows, Jeffrey L.
Study protocol: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial of the effectiveness of a deliberative loop in identifying implementation strategies for the adoption of a dental sealant guideline in dental clinics
title Study protocol: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial of the effectiveness of a deliberative loop in identifying implementation strategies for the adoption of a dental sealant guideline in dental clinics
title_full Study protocol: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial of the effectiveness of a deliberative loop in identifying implementation strategies for the adoption of a dental sealant guideline in dental clinics
title_fullStr Study protocol: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial of the effectiveness of a deliberative loop in identifying implementation strategies for the adoption of a dental sealant guideline in dental clinics
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial of the effectiveness of a deliberative loop in identifying implementation strategies for the adoption of a dental sealant guideline in dental clinics
title_short Study protocol: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial of the effectiveness of a deliberative loop in identifying implementation strategies for the adoption of a dental sealant guideline in dental clinics
title_sort study protocol: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial of the effectiveness of a deliberative loop in identifying implementation strategies for the adoption of a dental sealant guideline in dental clinics
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00199-6
work_keys_str_mv AT polkdeborahe studyprotocolasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialoftheeffectivenessofadeliberativeloopinidentifyingimplementationstrategiesfortheadoptionofadentalsealantguidelineindentalclinics
AT guerreroerickg studyprotocolasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialoftheeffectivenessofadeliberativeloopinidentifyingimplementationstrategiesfortheadoptionofadentalsealantguidelineindentalclinics
AT grußinga studyprotocolasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialoftheeffectivenessofadeliberativeloopinidentifyingimplementationstrategiesfortheadoptionofadentalsealantguidelineindentalclinics
AT shahnileshh studyprotocolasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialoftheeffectivenessofadeliberativeloopinidentifyingimplementationstrategiesfortheadoptionofadentalsealantguidelineindentalclinics
AT yosufnadiam studyprotocolasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialoftheeffectivenessofadeliberativeloopinidentifyingimplementationstrategiesfortheadoptionofadentalsealantguidelineindentalclinics
AT dawsontim studyprotocolasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialoftheeffectivenessofadeliberativeloopinidentifyingimplementationstrategiesfortheadoptionofadentalsealantguidelineindentalclinics
AT kaplancharlesd studyprotocolasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialoftheeffectivenessofadeliberativeloopinidentifyingimplementationstrategiesfortheadoptionofadentalsealantguidelineindentalclinics
AT pihlstromdanielj studyprotocolasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialoftheeffectivenessofadeliberativeloopinidentifyingimplementationstrategiesfortheadoptionofadentalsealantguidelineindentalclinics
AT fellowsjeffreyl studyprotocolasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialoftheeffectivenessofadeliberativeloopinidentifyingimplementationstrategiesfortheadoptionofadentalsealantguidelineindentalclinics