Cargando…

Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened

BACKGROUND: The end-expiratory occlusion (EEXPO) test detects preload responsiveness, but it is 15 s long and induces small changes in cardiac index (CI). It is doubtful whether the Starling bioreactance device, which averages CI over 24 s and refreshes the displayed value every 4 s (Starling-24.4),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gavelli, Francesco, Beurton, Alexandra, Teboul, Jean-Louis, De Vita, Nello, Azzolina, Danila, Shi, Rui, Pavot, Arthur, Monnet, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00920-7
_version_ 1783745533661151232
author Gavelli, Francesco
Beurton, Alexandra
Teboul, Jean-Louis
De Vita, Nello
Azzolina, Danila
Shi, Rui
Pavot, Arthur
Monnet, Xavier
author_facet Gavelli, Francesco
Beurton, Alexandra
Teboul, Jean-Louis
De Vita, Nello
Azzolina, Danila
Shi, Rui
Pavot, Arthur
Monnet, Xavier
author_sort Gavelli, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The end-expiratory occlusion (EEXPO) test detects preload responsiveness, but it is 15 s long and induces small changes in cardiac index (CI). It is doubtful whether the Starling bioreactance device, which averages CI over 24 s and refreshes the displayed value every 4 s (Starling-24.4), can detect the EEXPO-induced changes in CI (ΔCI). Our primary goal was to test whether this Starling device version detects preload responsiveness through EEXPO. We also tested whether shortening the averaging and refresh times to 8 s and one second, respectively, (Starling-8.1) improves the accuracy of the device in detecting preload responsiveness using EEXPO. METHODS: In 42 mechanically ventilated patients, during a 15-s EEXPO, we measured ∆CI through calibrated pulse contour analysis (CI(pulse), PiCCO2 device) and using the Starling device. For the latter, we considered both CI(Starling-24.4) from the commercial version and CI(Starling-8.1) derived from the raw data. For relative ∆CI(Starling-24.4) and ∆CI(Starling-8.1) during EEXPO, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to detect preload responsiveness, defined as an increase in CI(pulse) ≥ 10% during passive leg raising (PLR). For both methods, the correlation coefficient vs. ∆CI(pulse) was calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were preload responders and sixteen non preload-responders. The AUROC for ∆CI(Starling-24.4) was significantly lower compared to ∆CI(Starling-8.1) (0.680 ± 0.086 vs. 0.899 ± 0.049, respectively; p = 0.027). A significant correlation was observed between ∆CI(Starling-8.1) and ∆CI(pulse) (r = 0.42; p = 0.009), but not between ∆CI(Starling-24.4) and ∆CI(pulse). During PLR, both ∆CI(Starling-24.4) and ∆CI(Starling-8.1) reliably detected preload responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Shortening the averaging and refresh times of the bioreactance signal to 8 s and one second, respectively, increases the reliability of the Starling device in detection of EEXPO-induced ∆CI. Trial registration: No. IDRCB:2018-A02825-50. Registered 13 December 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-021-00920-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8401368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84013682021-08-30 Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened Gavelli, Francesco Beurton, Alexandra Teboul, Jean-Louis De Vita, Nello Azzolina, Danila Shi, Rui Pavot, Arthur Monnet, Xavier Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The end-expiratory occlusion (EEXPO) test detects preload responsiveness, but it is 15 s long and induces small changes in cardiac index (CI). It is doubtful whether the Starling bioreactance device, which averages CI over 24 s and refreshes the displayed value every 4 s (Starling-24.4), can detect the EEXPO-induced changes in CI (ΔCI). Our primary goal was to test whether this Starling device version detects preload responsiveness through EEXPO. We also tested whether shortening the averaging and refresh times to 8 s and one second, respectively, (Starling-8.1) improves the accuracy of the device in detecting preload responsiveness using EEXPO. METHODS: In 42 mechanically ventilated patients, during a 15-s EEXPO, we measured ∆CI through calibrated pulse contour analysis (CI(pulse), PiCCO2 device) and using the Starling device. For the latter, we considered both CI(Starling-24.4) from the commercial version and CI(Starling-8.1) derived from the raw data. For relative ∆CI(Starling-24.4) and ∆CI(Starling-8.1) during EEXPO, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to detect preload responsiveness, defined as an increase in CI(pulse) ≥ 10% during passive leg raising (PLR). For both methods, the correlation coefficient vs. ∆CI(pulse) was calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were preload responders and sixteen non preload-responders. The AUROC for ∆CI(Starling-24.4) was significantly lower compared to ∆CI(Starling-8.1) (0.680 ± 0.086 vs. 0.899 ± 0.049, respectively; p = 0.027). A significant correlation was observed between ∆CI(Starling-8.1) and ∆CI(pulse) (r = 0.42; p = 0.009), but not between ∆CI(Starling-24.4) and ∆CI(pulse). During PLR, both ∆CI(Starling-24.4) and ∆CI(Starling-8.1) reliably detected preload responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Shortening the averaging and refresh times of the bioreactance signal to 8 s and one second, respectively, increases the reliability of the Starling device in detection of EEXPO-induced ∆CI. Trial registration: No. IDRCB:2018-A02825-50. Registered 13 December 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-021-00920-7. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8401368/ /pubmed/34453633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00920-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Gavelli, Francesco
Beurton, Alexandra
Teboul, Jean-Louis
De Vita, Nello
Azzolina, Danila
Shi, Rui
Pavot, Arthur
Monnet, Xavier
Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
title Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
title_full Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
title_fullStr Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
title_full_unstemmed Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
title_short Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
title_sort bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00920-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gavellifrancesco bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT beurtonalexandra bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT tebouljeanlouis bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT devitanello bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT azzolinadanila bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT shirui bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT pavotarthur bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened
AT monnetxavier bioreactancereliablydetectspreloadresponsivenessbytheendexpiratoryocclusiontestwhenaveragingandrefreshtimesareshortened