Cargando…
The EPIPHA-KNEE trial: Explaining Pain to target unhelpful pain beliefs to Increase PHysical Activity in KNEE osteoarthritis – a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with clinical- and cost-effectiveness analysis
BACKGROUND: Despite well-established benefits of physical activity for knee osteoarthritis (OA), nine of ten people with knee OA are inactive. People with knee OA who are inactive often believe that physical activity is dangerous, fearing that it will further damage their joint(s). Such unhelpful be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04561-6 |
_version_ | 1783745534618501120 |
---|---|
author | Stanton, Tasha R. Braithwaite, Felicity A. Butler, David Moseley, G. Lorimer Hill, Catherine Milte, Rachel Ratcliffe, Julie Maher, Carol Tomkins-Lane, Christy Pulling, Brian W. MacIntyre, Erin Esterman, Adrian Stanford, Ty Lee, Hopin Fraysse, Francois Metcalf, Ben Mouatt, Brendan Bennell, Kim |
author_facet | Stanton, Tasha R. Braithwaite, Felicity A. Butler, David Moseley, G. Lorimer Hill, Catherine Milte, Rachel Ratcliffe, Julie Maher, Carol Tomkins-Lane, Christy Pulling, Brian W. MacIntyre, Erin Esterman, Adrian Stanford, Ty Lee, Hopin Fraysse, Francois Metcalf, Ben Mouatt, Brendan Bennell, Kim |
author_sort | Stanton, Tasha R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite well-established benefits of physical activity for knee osteoarthritis (OA), nine of ten people with knee OA are inactive. People with knee OA who are inactive often believe that physical activity is dangerous, fearing that it will further damage their joint(s). Such unhelpful beliefs can negatively influence physical activity levels. We aim to evaluate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of integrating physiotherapist-delivered pain science education (PSE), an evidence-based conceptual change intervention targeting unhelpful pain beliefs by increasing pain knowledge, with an individualised walking, strengthening, and general education program. METHODS: Two-arm, parallel-design, multicentre randomised controlled trial involving 198 people aged ≥50 years with painful knee OA who do not meet physical activity guideline recommendations or walk regularly for exercise. Both groups receive an individualised physiotherapist-led walking, strengthening, and OA/activity education program via 4x weekly in-person treatment sessions, followed by 4 weeks of at-home activities (weekly check-in via telehealth), with follow-up sessions at 3 months (telehealth) and 5 and 9 months (in-person). The EPIPHA-KNEE group also receives contemporary PSE about OA/pain and activity, embedded into all aspects of the intervention. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcomes are physical activity level (step count; wrist-based accelerometry) and self-reported knee symptoms (WOMAC Total score) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, pain intensity, global rating of change, self-efficacy, pain catastrophising, depression, anxiety, stress, fear of movement, knee awareness, OA/activity conceptualisation, and self-regulated learning ability. Additional measures include adherence, adverse events, blinding success, COVID-19 impact on activity, intention to exercise, treatment expectancy/perceived credibility, implicit movement/environmental bias, implicit motor imagery, two-point discrimination, and pain sensitivity to activity. Cost-utility analysis of the EPIPHA-KNEE intervention will be undertaken, in addition to evaluation of cost-effectiveness in the context of primary trial outcomes. DISCUSSION: We will determine whether the integration of PSE into an individualised OA education, walking, and strengthening program is more effective than receiving the individualised program alone. Findings will inform the development and implementation of future delivery of PSE as part of best practice for people with knee OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12620001041943 (13/10/2020). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04561-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8401372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84013722021-08-30 The EPIPHA-KNEE trial: Explaining Pain to target unhelpful pain beliefs to Increase PHysical Activity in KNEE osteoarthritis – a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with clinical- and cost-effectiveness analysis Stanton, Tasha R. Braithwaite, Felicity A. Butler, David Moseley, G. Lorimer Hill, Catherine Milte, Rachel Ratcliffe, Julie Maher, Carol Tomkins-Lane, Christy Pulling, Brian W. MacIntyre, Erin Esterman, Adrian Stanford, Ty Lee, Hopin Fraysse, Francois Metcalf, Ben Mouatt, Brendan Bennell, Kim BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite well-established benefits of physical activity for knee osteoarthritis (OA), nine of ten people with knee OA are inactive. People with knee OA who are inactive often believe that physical activity is dangerous, fearing that it will further damage their joint(s). Such unhelpful beliefs can negatively influence physical activity levels. We aim to evaluate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of integrating physiotherapist-delivered pain science education (PSE), an evidence-based conceptual change intervention targeting unhelpful pain beliefs by increasing pain knowledge, with an individualised walking, strengthening, and general education program. METHODS: Two-arm, parallel-design, multicentre randomised controlled trial involving 198 people aged ≥50 years with painful knee OA who do not meet physical activity guideline recommendations or walk regularly for exercise. Both groups receive an individualised physiotherapist-led walking, strengthening, and OA/activity education program via 4x weekly in-person treatment sessions, followed by 4 weeks of at-home activities (weekly check-in via telehealth), with follow-up sessions at 3 months (telehealth) and 5 and 9 months (in-person). The EPIPHA-KNEE group also receives contemporary PSE about OA/pain and activity, embedded into all aspects of the intervention. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcomes are physical activity level (step count; wrist-based accelerometry) and self-reported knee symptoms (WOMAC Total score) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, pain intensity, global rating of change, self-efficacy, pain catastrophising, depression, anxiety, stress, fear of movement, knee awareness, OA/activity conceptualisation, and self-regulated learning ability. Additional measures include adherence, adverse events, blinding success, COVID-19 impact on activity, intention to exercise, treatment expectancy/perceived credibility, implicit movement/environmental bias, implicit motor imagery, two-point discrimination, and pain sensitivity to activity. Cost-utility analysis of the EPIPHA-KNEE intervention will be undertaken, in addition to evaluation of cost-effectiveness in the context of primary trial outcomes. DISCUSSION: We will determine whether the integration of PSE into an individualised OA education, walking, and strengthening program is more effective than receiving the individualised program alone. Findings will inform the development and implementation of future delivery of PSE as part of best practice for people with knee OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12620001041943 (13/10/2020). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04561-6. BioMed Central 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8401372/ /pubmed/34454458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04561-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Stanton, Tasha R. Braithwaite, Felicity A. Butler, David Moseley, G. Lorimer Hill, Catherine Milte, Rachel Ratcliffe, Julie Maher, Carol Tomkins-Lane, Christy Pulling, Brian W. MacIntyre, Erin Esterman, Adrian Stanford, Ty Lee, Hopin Fraysse, Francois Metcalf, Ben Mouatt, Brendan Bennell, Kim The EPIPHA-KNEE trial: Explaining Pain to target unhelpful pain beliefs to Increase PHysical Activity in KNEE osteoarthritis – a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with clinical- and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title | The EPIPHA-KNEE trial: Explaining Pain to target unhelpful pain beliefs to Increase PHysical Activity in KNEE osteoarthritis – a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with clinical- and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full | The EPIPHA-KNEE trial: Explaining Pain to target unhelpful pain beliefs to Increase PHysical Activity in KNEE osteoarthritis – a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with clinical- and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_fullStr | The EPIPHA-KNEE trial: Explaining Pain to target unhelpful pain beliefs to Increase PHysical Activity in KNEE osteoarthritis – a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with clinical- and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The EPIPHA-KNEE trial: Explaining Pain to target unhelpful pain beliefs to Increase PHysical Activity in KNEE osteoarthritis – a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with clinical- and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_short | The EPIPHA-KNEE trial: Explaining Pain to target unhelpful pain beliefs to Increase PHysical Activity in KNEE osteoarthritis – a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with clinical- and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_sort | epipha-knee trial: explaining pain to target unhelpful pain beliefs to increase physical activity in knee osteoarthritis – a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with clinical- and cost-effectiveness analysis |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8401372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04561-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stantontashar theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT braithwaitefelicitya theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT butlerdavid theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT moseleyglorimer theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT hillcatherine theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT milterachel theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT ratcliffejulie theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT mahercarol theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT tomkinslanechristy theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT pullingbrianw theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT macintyreerin theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT estermanadrian theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT stanfordty theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT leehopin theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT frayssefrancois theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT metcalfben theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT mouattbrendan theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT bennellkim theepiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT stantontashar epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT braithwaitefelicitya epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT butlerdavid epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT moseleyglorimer epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT hillcatherine epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT milterachel epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT ratcliffejulie epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT mahercarol epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT tomkinslanechristy epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT pullingbrianw epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT macintyreerin epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT estermanadrian epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT stanfordty epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT leehopin epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT frayssefrancois epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT metcalfben epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT mouattbrendan epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT bennellkim epiphakneetrialexplainingpaintotargetunhelpfulpainbeliefstoincreasephysicalactivityinkneeosteoarthritisaprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialwithclinicalandcosteffectivenessanalysis |