Cargando…
Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A
Two methods for measuring ochratoxin A in corn, oat, and grape juice were developed and compared. Flow injection (FI) and on-line liquid chromatography (LC) performances were evaluated separately, with both methods using a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS) for quantitation. Samples...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13080547 |
_version_ | 1783745766741770240 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Kai |
author_facet | Zhang, Kai |
author_sort | Zhang, Kai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two methods for measuring ochratoxin A in corn, oat, and grape juice were developed and compared. Flow injection (FI) and on-line liquid chromatography (LC) performances were evaluated separately, with both methods using a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS) for quantitation. Samples were fortified with (13)C uniformly labeled ochratoxin A as the internal standard ((13)C-IS) and prepared by dilution and filtration, followed by FI- and LC-MS/MS analysis. For the LC-MS/MS method, which had a 10 min run time/sample, recoveries of ochratoxin A fortified at 1, 5, 20, and 100 ppb in corn, oat, red grape juice, and white grape juice ranged from 100% to 117% with RSDs < 9%. The analysis time of the FI-MS/MS method was <60 s/sample, however, the method could not detect ochratoxin A at the lowest fortification concentration, 1 ppb, in all tested matrix sources. At 5, 20, and 100 ppb, recoveries by FI-MS/MS ranged from 79 to 117% with RSDs < 15%. The FI-MS/MS method also had ~5× higher solvent and matrix-dependent instrument detection limits (0.12–0.35 ppb) compared to the LC-MS/MS method (0.02–0.06 ppb). In the analysis of incurred corn and oat samples, both methods generated comparable results within ±20% of reference values, however, the FI-MS/MS method failed to determine ochratoxin A in two incurred wheat flour samples due to co-eluted interferences due to the lack of chromatographic separation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8402343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84023432021-08-29 Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A Zhang, Kai Toxins (Basel) Article Two methods for measuring ochratoxin A in corn, oat, and grape juice were developed and compared. Flow injection (FI) and on-line liquid chromatography (LC) performances were evaluated separately, with both methods using a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS) for quantitation. Samples were fortified with (13)C uniformly labeled ochratoxin A as the internal standard ((13)C-IS) and prepared by dilution and filtration, followed by FI- and LC-MS/MS analysis. For the LC-MS/MS method, which had a 10 min run time/sample, recoveries of ochratoxin A fortified at 1, 5, 20, and 100 ppb in corn, oat, red grape juice, and white grape juice ranged from 100% to 117% with RSDs < 9%. The analysis time of the FI-MS/MS method was <60 s/sample, however, the method could not detect ochratoxin A at the lowest fortification concentration, 1 ppb, in all tested matrix sources. At 5, 20, and 100 ppb, recoveries by FI-MS/MS ranged from 79 to 117% with RSDs < 15%. The FI-MS/MS method also had ~5× higher solvent and matrix-dependent instrument detection limits (0.12–0.35 ppb) compared to the LC-MS/MS method (0.02–0.06 ppb). In the analysis of incurred corn and oat samples, both methods generated comparable results within ±20% of reference values, however, the FI-MS/MS method failed to determine ochratoxin A in two incurred wheat flour samples due to co-eluted interferences due to the lack of chromatographic separation. MDPI 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8402343/ /pubmed/34437418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13080547 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Kai Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A |
title | Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A |
title_full | Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A |
title_short | Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A |
title_sort | comparison of flow injection-ms/ms and lc-ms/ms for the determination of ochratoxin a |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13080547 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangkai comparisonofflowinjectionmsmsandlcmsmsforthedeterminationofochratoxina |