Cargando…

Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A

Two methods for measuring ochratoxin A in corn, oat, and grape juice were developed and compared. Flow injection (FI) and on-line liquid chromatography (LC) performances were evaluated separately, with both methods using a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS) for quantitation. Samples...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Zhang, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13080547
_version_ 1783745766741770240
author Zhang, Kai
author_facet Zhang, Kai
author_sort Zhang, Kai
collection PubMed
description Two methods for measuring ochratoxin A in corn, oat, and grape juice were developed and compared. Flow injection (FI) and on-line liquid chromatography (LC) performances were evaluated separately, with both methods using a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS) for quantitation. Samples were fortified with (13)C uniformly labeled ochratoxin A as the internal standard ((13)C-IS) and prepared by dilution and filtration, followed by FI- and LC-MS/MS analysis. For the LC-MS/MS method, which had a 10 min run time/sample, recoveries of ochratoxin A fortified at 1, 5, 20, and 100 ppb in corn, oat, red grape juice, and white grape juice ranged from 100% to 117% with RSDs < 9%. The analysis time of the FI-MS/MS method was <60 s/sample, however, the method could not detect ochratoxin A at the lowest fortification concentration, 1 ppb, in all tested matrix sources. At 5, 20, and 100 ppb, recoveries by FI-MS/MS ranged from 79 to 117% with RSDs < 15%. The FI-MS/MS method also had ~5× higher solvent and matrix-dependent instrument detection limits (0.12–0.35 ppb) compared to the LC-MS/MS method (0.02–0.06 ppb). In the analysis of incurred corn and oat samples, both methods generated comparable results within ±20% of reference values, however, the FI-MS/MS method failed to determine ochratoxin A in two incurred wheat flour samples due to co-eluted interferences due to the lack of chromatographic separation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8402343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84023432021-08-29 Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A Zhang, Kai Toxins (Basel) Article Two methods for measuring ochratoxin A in corn, oat, and grape juice were developed and compared. Flow injection (FI) and on-line liquid chromatography (LC) performances were evaluated separately, with both methods using a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS) for quantitation. Samples were fortified with (13)C uniformly labeled ochratoxin A as the internal standard ((13)C-IS) and prepared by dilution and filtration, followed by FI- and LC-MS/MS analysis. For the LC-MS/MS method, which had a 10 min run time/sample, recoveries of ochratoxin A fortified at 1, 5, 20, and 100 ppb in corn, oat, red grape juice, and white grape juice ranged from 100% to 117% with RSDs < 9%. The analysis time of the FI-MS/MS method was <60 s/sample, however, the method could not detect ochratoxin A at the lowest fortification concentration, 1 ppb, in all tested matrix sources. At 5, 20, and 100 ppb, recoveries by FI-MS/MS ranged from 79 to 117% with RSDs < 15%. The FI-MS/MS method also had ~5× higher solvent and matrix-dependent instrument detection limits (0.12–0.35 ppb) compared to the LC-MS/MS method (0.02–0.06 ppb). In the analysis of incurred corn and oat samples, both methods generated comparable results within ±20% of reference values, however, the FI-MS/MS method failed to determine ochratoxin A in two incurred wheat flour samples due to co-eluted interferences due to the lack of chromatographic separation. MDPI 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8402343/ /pubmed/34437418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13080547 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Kai
Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A
title Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A
title_full Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A
title_fullStr Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A
title_short Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A
title_sort comparison of flow injection-ms/ms and lc-ms/ms for the determination of ochratoxin a
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins13080547
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangkai comparisonofflowinjectionmsmsandlcmsmsforthedeterminationofochratoxina