Cargando…

Relationship between Biological, Training, and Physical Fitness Variables in the Expression of Performance in Non-Professional Runners

Sports performance is a multifactorial trait that can be associated with individual and environmental characteristics. In this study, the sample comprised 35 male runners, enrolled in the “InTrack” project. Information regarding variables related to runners’ training was obtained via an online quest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thuany, Mabliny, Gomes, Thayse Natacha, Almeida, Marcos B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9080114
_version_ 1783745800542617600
author Thuany, Mabliny
Gomes, Thayse Natacha
Almeida, Marcos B.
author_facet Thuany, Mabliny
Gomes, Thayse Natacha
Almeida, Marcos B.
author_sort Thuany, Mabliny
collection PubMed
description Sports performance is a multifactorial trait that can be associated with individual and environmental characteristics. In this study, the sample comprised 35 male runners, enrolled in the “InTrack” project. Information regarding variables related to runners’ training was obtained via an online questionnaire, while anthropometric and body composition variables, as well as physical fitness components (muscular power, isometric strength, local muscular endurance, agility, and aerobic capacity) were measured, and a global physical fitness score (based on physical fitness components measured) was computed. The Weltman test (3200 m) was used to estimate runners’ pace and their stride frequency. Linear regression was used, taking the running pace as dependent variable. The final model, comprising biological, physical fitness, spatiotemporal, and training variables, explained 86% of the running performance variance. Muscular power (β = −1.02; 95% CI = (−1.69)–(−0.35)), abdominal muscle endurance (β = −4.81; 95% CI = (−7.52)–(−2.10)), isometric strength (β = −422.95; 95% CI = (−689.65)–(−156.25)), global physical fitness (β = 27.14; 95% CI = 9.52–45.03), and stride frequency (β = −2.99; 95% CI = (−4.29)–(−1.69)) were significantly associated with performance, meaning that better results in tests and increasing the stride frequency leads to better performance. Individual characteristics and physical fitness components were demonstrated to be significant predictors for running performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8402483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84024832021-08-29 Relationship between Biological, Training, and Physical Fitness Variables in the Expression of Performance in Non-Professional Runners Thuany, Mabliny Gomes, Thayse Natacha Almeida, Marcos B. Sports (Basel) Article Sports performance is a multifactorial trait that can be associated with individual and environmental characteristics. In this study, the sample comprised 35 male runners, enrolled in the “InTrack” project. Information regarding variables related to runners’ training was obtained via an online questionnaire, while anthropometric and body composition variables, as well as physical fitness components (muscular power, isometric strength, local muscular endurance, agility, and aerobic capacity) were measured, and a global physical fitness score (based on physical fitness components measured) was computed. The Weltman test (3200 m) was used to estimate runners’ pace and their stride frequency. Linear regression was used, taking the running pace as dependent variable. The final model, comprising biological, physical fitness, spatiotemporal, and training variables, explained 86% of the running performance variance. Muscular power (β = −1.02; 95% CI = (−1.69)–(−0.35)), abdominal muscle endurance (β = −4.81; 95% CI = (−7.52)–(−2.10)), isometric strength (β = −422.95; 95% CI = (−689.65)–(−156.25)), global physical fitness (β = 27.14; 95% CI = 9.52–45.03), and stride frequency (β = −2.99; 95% CI = (−4.29)–(−1.69)) were significantly associated with performance, meaning that better results in tests and increasing the stride frequency leads to better performance. Individual characteristics and physical fitness components were demonstrated to be significant predictors for running performance. MDPI 2021-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8402483/ /pubmed/34437375 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9080114 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Thuany, Mabliny
Gomes, Thayse Natacha
Almeida, Marcos B.
Relationship between Biological, Training, and Physical Fitness Variables in the Expression of Performance in Non-Professional Runners
title Relationship between Biological, Training, and Physical Fitness Variables in the Expression of Performance in Non-Professional Runners
title_full Relationship between Biological, Training, and Physical Fitness Variables in the Expression of Performance in Non-Professional Runners
title_fullStr Relationship between Biological, Training, and Physical Fitness Variables in the Expression of Performance in Non-Professional Runners
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between Biological, Training, and Physical Fitness Variables in the Expression of Performance in Non-Professional Runners
title_short Relationship between Biological, Training, and Physical Fitness Variables in the Expression of Performance in Non-Professional Runners
title_sort relationship between biological, training, and physical fitness variables in the expression of performance in non-professional runners
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9080114
work_keys_str_mv AT thuanymabliny relationshipbetweenbiologicaltrainingandphysicalfitnessvariablesintheexpressionofperformanceinnonprofessionalrunners
AT gomesthaysenatacha relationshipbetweenbiologicaltrainingandphysicalfitnessvariablesintheexpressionofperformanceinnonprofessionalrunners
AT almeidamarcosb relationshipbetweenbiologicaltrainingandphysicalfitnessvariablesintheexpressionofperformanceinnonprofessionalrunners