Cargando…
Phase Noise of SAW Delay Line Magnetic Field Sensors
Surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors for the detection of magnetic fields are currently being studied scientifically in many ways, especially since both their sensitivity as well as their detectivity could be significantly improved by the utilization of shear horizontal surface acoustic waves, i.e.,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34451074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165631 |
_version_ | 1783745808592535552 |
---|---|
author | Durdaut, Phillip Müller, Cai Kittmann, Anne Schell, Viktor Bahr, Andreas Quandt, Eckhard Knöchel, Reinhard Höft, Michael McCord, Jeffrey |
author_facet | Durdaut, Phillip Müller, Cai Kittmann, Anne Schell, Viktor Bahr, Andreas Quandt, Eckhard Knöchel, Reinhard Höft, Michael McCord, Jeffrey |
author_sort | Durdaut, Phillip |
collection | PubMed |
description | Surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors for the detection of magnetic fields are currently being studied scientifically in many ways, especially since both their sensitivity as well as their detectivity could be significantly improved by the utilization of shear horizontal surface acoustic waves, i.e., Love waves, instead of Rayleigh waves. By now, low-frequency limits of detection (LOD) below 100 pT/ [Formula: see text] can be achieved. However, the LOD can only be further improved by gaining a deep understanding of the existing sensor-intrinsic noise sources and their impact on the sensor’s overall performance. This paper reports on a comprehensive study of the inherent noise of SAW delay line magnetic field sensors. In addition to the noise, however, the sensitivity is of importance, since both quantities are equally important for the LOD. Following the necessary explanations of the electrical and magnetic sensor properties, a further focus is on the losses within the sensor, since these are closely linked to the noise. The considered parameters are in particular the ambient magnetic bias field and the input power of the sensor. Depending on the sensor’s operating point, various noise mechanisms contribute to [Formula: see text] white phase noise, [Formula: see text] flicker phase noise, and [Formula: see text] random walk of phase. Flicker phase noise due to magnetic hysteresis losses, i.e. random fluctuations of the magnetization, is usually dominant under typical operating conditions. Noise characteristics are related to the overall magnetic and magnetic domain behavior. Both calculations and measurements show that the LOD cannot be further improved by increasing the sensitivity. Instead, the losses occurring in the magnetic material need to be decreased. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8402516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84025162021-08-29 Phase Noise of SAW Delay Line Magnetic Field Sensors Durdaut, Phillip Müller, Cai Kittmann, Anne Schell, Viktor Bahr, Andreas Quandt, Eckhard Knöchel, Reinhard Höft, Michael McCord, Jeffrey Sensors (Basel) Article Surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors for the detection of magnetic fields are currently being studied scientifically in many ways, especially since both their sensitivity as well as their detectivity could be significantly improved by the utilization of shear horizontal surface acoustic waves, i.e., Love waves, instead of Rayleigh waves. By now, low-frequency limits of detection (LOD) below 100 pT/ [Formula: see text] can be achieved. However, the LOD can only be further improved by gaining a deep understanding of the existing sensor-intrinsic noise sources and their impact on the sensor’s overall performance. This paper reports on a comprehensive study of the inherent noise of SAW delay line magnetic field sensors. In addition to the noise, however, the sensitivity is of importance, since both quantities are equally important for the LOD. Following the necessary explanations of the electrical and magnetic sensor properties, a further focus is on the losses within the sensor, since these are closely linked to the noise. The considered parameters are in particular the ambient magnetic bias field and the input power of the sensor. Depending on the sensor’s operating point, various noise mechanisms contribute to [Formula: see text] white phase noise, [Formula: see text] flicker phase noise, and [Formula: see text] random walk of phase. Flicker phase noise due to magnetic hysteresis losses, i.e. random fluctuations of the magnetization, is usually dominant under typical operating conditions. Noise characteristics are related to the overall magnetic and magnetic domain behavior. Both calculations and measurements show that the LOD cannot be further improved by increasing the sensitivity. Instead, the losses occurring in the magnetic material need to be decreased. MDPI 2021-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8402516/ /pubmed/34451074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165631 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Durdaut, Phillip Müller, Cai Kittmann, Anne Schell, Viktor Bahr, Andreas Quandt, Eckhard Knöchel, Reinhard Höft, Michael McCord, Jeffrey Phase Noise of SAW Delay Line Magnetic Field Sensors |
title | Phase Noise of SAW Delay Line Magnetic Field Sensors |
title_full | Phase Noise of SAW Delay Line Magnetic Field Sensors |
title_fullStr | Phase Noise of SAW Delay Line Magnetic Field Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase Noise of SAW Delay Line Magnetic Field Sensors |
title_short | Phase Noise of SAW Delay Line Magnetic Field Sensors |
title_sort | phase noise of saw delay line magnetic field sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34451074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21165631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT durdautphillip phasenoiseofsawdelaylinemagneticfieldsensors AT mullercai phasenoiseofsawdelaylinemagneticfieldsensors AT kittmannanne phasenoiseofsawdelaylinemagneticfieldsensors AT schellviktor phasenoiseofsawdelaylinemagneticfieldsensors AT bahrandreas phasenoiseofsawdelaylinemagneticfieldsensors AT quandteckhard phasenoiseofsawdelaylinemagneticfieldsensors AT knochelreinhard phasenoiseofsawdelaylinemagneticfieldsensors AT hoftmichael phasenoiseofsawdelaylinemagneticfieldsensors AT mccordjeffrey phasenoiseofsawdelaylinemagneticfieldsensors |