Cargando…

Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Small Animals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Veterinary Literature

In veterinary surgery, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) techniques have been described since 2009, and, in recent decades, many authors have reported the application of SILS in small animals, thus, promoting the wide dissemination of this novel approach among veterinary laparoscopists. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lacitignola, Luca, Guadalupi, Marta, Massari, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437466
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8080144
_version_ 1783745834599317504
author Lacitignola, Luca
Guadalupi, Marta
Massari, Federico
author_facet Lacitignola, Luca
Guadalupi, Marta
Massari, Federico
author_sort Lacitignola, Luca
collection PubMed
description In veterinary surgery, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) techniques have been described since 2009, and, in recent decades, many authors have reported the application of SILS in small animals, thus, promoting the wide dissemination of this novel approach among veterinary laparoscopists. The aim of this literature review is to provide a critical evaluation of the scientific reports on SILS in the field of small animal laparoscopic surgery. A comprehensive literature review was performed including from 1 January 2009 to 1 July 2020. The following data were recorded from each study: the design, year of publication, surgical procedure, species, number of animals included, and surgical time. The type of SILS technique and type of control group technique were evaluated. In total, 90 articles were identified through database searches and manual searches. The qualitative analysis showed that most of the articles were retrospective studies, without a control group or case series. A meta-analysis was performed on the eight controlled studies, showing that SILS ovariectomy and gastrointestinal procedures had a comparable surgical time to multiport techniques. The study of the articles available in the veterinary literature did not allow for an adequate meta-analysis of the published results, especially regarding post-operative pain, evaluations of surgical times, and post-operative complications in comparison to multiport techniques. Therefore, veterinary surgeons who want to employ these techniques must consider the real advantages of SILS techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8402624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84026242021-08-29 Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Small Animals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Veterinary Literature Lacitignola, Luca Guadalupi, Marta Massari, Federico Vet Sci Systematic Review In veterinary surgery, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) techniques have been described since 2009, and, in recent decades, many authors have reported the application of SILS in small animals, thus, promoting the wide dissemination of this novel approach among veterinary laparoscopists. The aim of this literature review is to provide a critical evaluation of the scientific reports on SILS in the field of small animal laparoscopic surgery. A comprehensive literature review was performed including from 1 January 2009 to 1 July 2020. The following data were recorded from each study: the design, year of publication, surgical procedure, species, number of animals included, and surgical time. The type of SILS technique and type of control group technique were evaluated. In total, 90 articles were identified through database searches and manual searches. The qualitative analysis showed that most of the articles were retrospective studies, without a control group or case series. A meta-analysis was performed on the eight controlled studies, showing that SILS ovariectomy and gastrointestinal procedures had a comparable surgical time to multiport techniques. The study of the articles available in the veterinary literature did not allow for an adequate meta-analysis of the published results, especially regarding post-operative pain, evaluations of surgical times, and post-operative complications in comparison to multiport techniques. Therefore, veterinary surgeons who want to employ these techniques must consider the real advantages of SILS techniques. MDPI 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8402624/ /pubmed/34437466 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8080144 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Lacitignola, Luca
Guadalupi, Marta
Massari, Federico
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Small Animals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Veterinary Literature
title Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Small Animals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Veterinary Literature
title_full Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Small Animals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Veterinary Literature
title_fullStr Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Small Animals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Veterinary Literature
title_full_unstemmed Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Small Animals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Veterinary Literature
title_short Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Small Animals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Veterinary Literature
title_sort single incision laparoscopic surgery (sils) in small animals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current veterinary literature
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437466
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8080144
work_keys_str_mv AT lacitignolaluca singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgerysilsinsmallanimalsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcurrentveterinaryliterature
AT guadalupimarta singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgerysilsinsmallanimalsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcurrentveterinaryliterature
AT massarifederico singleincisionlaparoscopicsurgerysilsinsmallanimalsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcurrentveterinaryliterature