Cargando…

Exosome-Based Vaccines: Pros and Cons in the World of Animal Health

Due to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and new and more complex diseases that affect livestock animal health and food security, the control of epidemics has become a top priority worldwide. Vaccination represents the most important and cost-effective measure to control infectious diseases in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montaner-Tarbes, Sergio, Fraile, Lorenzo, Montoya, María, Del Portillo, Hernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13081499
_version_ 1783745870407139328
author Montaner-Tarbes, Sergio
Fraile, Lorenzo
Montoya, María
Del Portillo, Hernando
author_facet Montaner-Tarbes, Sergio
Fraile, Lorenzo
Montoya, María
Del Portillo, Hernando
author_sort Montaner-Tarbes, Sergio
collection PubMed
description Due to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and new and more complex diseases that affect livestock animal health and food security, the control of epidemics has become a top priority worldwide. Vaccination represents the most important and cost-effective measure to control infectious diseases in animal health, but it represents only 23% of the total global animal health market, highlighting the need to develop new vaccines. A recent strategy in animal health vaccination is the use of extracellular vesicles (EVs), lipid bilayer nanovesicles produced by almost all living cells, including both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. EVs have been evaluated as a prominent source of viral antigens to elicit specific immune responses and to develop new vaccination platforms as viruses and EVs share biogenesis pathways. Preliminary trials with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection (LCMV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), and Marek’s disease virus (MDV) have demonstrated that EVs have a role in the activation of cellular and antibody immune responses. Moreover, in parasitic diseases such as Eimeria (chickens) and Plasmodium yoelii (mice) protection has been achieved. Research into EVs is therefore opening an opportunity for new strategies to overcome old problems affecting food security, animal health, and emerging diseases. Here, we review different conventional approaches for vaccine design and compare them with examples of EV-based vaccines that have already been tested in relation to animal health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8402771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84027712021-08-29 Exosome-Based Vaccines: Pros and Cons in the World of Animal Health Montaner-Tarbes, Sergio Fraile, Lorenzo Montoya, María Del Portillo, Hernando Viruses Review Due to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and new and more complex diseases that affect livestock animal health and food security, the control of epidemics has become a top priority worldwide. Vaccination represents the most important and cost-effective measure to control infectious diseases in animal health, but it represents only 23% of the total global animal health market, highlighting the need to develop new vaccines. A recent strategy in animal health vaccination is the use of extracellular vesicles (EVs), lipid bilayer nanovesicles produced by almost all living cells, including both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. EVs have been evaluated as a prominent source of viral antigens to elicit specific immune responses and to develop new vaccination platforms as viruses and EVs share biogenesis pathways. Preliminary trials with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection (LCMV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), and Marek’s disease virus (MDV) have demonstrated that EVs have a role in the activation of cellular and antibody immune responses. Moreover, in parasitic diseases such as Eimeria (chickens) and Plasmodium yoelii (mice) protection has been achieved. Research into EVs is therefore opening an opportunity for new strategies to overcome old problems affecting food security, animal health, and emerging diseases. Here, we review different conventional approaches for vaccine design and compare them with examples of EV-based vaccines that have already been tested in relation to animal health. MDPI 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8402771/ /pubmed/34452364 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13081499 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Montaner-Tarbes, Sergio
Fraile, Lorenzo
Montoya, María
Del Portillo, Hernando
Exosome-Based Vaccines: Pros and Cons in the World of Animal Health
title Exosome-Based Vaccines: Pros and Cons in the World of Animal Health
title_full Exosome-Based Vaccines: Pros and Cons in the World of Animal Health
title_fullStr Exosome-Based Vaccines: Pros and Cons in the World of Animal Health
title_full_unstemmed Exosome-Based Vaccines: Pros and Cons in the World of Animal Health
title_short Exosome-Based Vaccines: Pros and Cons in the World of Animal Health
title_sort exosome-based vaccines: pros and cons in the world of animal health
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13081499
work_keys_str_mv AT montanertarbessergio exosomebasedvaccinesprosandconsintheworldofanimalhealth
AT frailelorenzo exosomebasedvaccinesprosandconsintheworldofanimalhealth
AT montoyamaria exosomebasedvaccinesprosandconsintheworldofanimalhealth
AT delportillohernando exosomebasedvaccinesprosandconsintheworldofanimalhealth