Cargando…

BK Polyomavirus—Biology, Genomic Variation and Diagnosis

The BK polyomavirus (BKPyV), a representative of the family Polyomaviridae, is widespread in the human population. While the virus does not cause significant clinical symptoms in immunocompetent individuals, it is activated in cases of immune deficiency, both pharmacological and pathological. Infect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furmaga, Jacek, Kowalczyk, Marek, Zapolski, Tomasz, Furmaga, Olga, Krakowski, Leszek, Rudzki, Grzegorz, Jaroszyński, Andrzej, Jakubczak, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13081502
_version_ 1783745879385047040
author Furmaga, Jacek
Kowalczyk, Marek
Zapolski, Tomasz
Furmaga, Olga
Krakowski, Leszek
Rudzki, Grzegorz
Jaroszyński, Andrzej
Jakubczak, Andrzej
author_facet Furmaga, Jacek
Kowalczyk, Marek
Zapolski, Tomasz
Furmaga, Olga
Krakowski, Leszek
Rudzki, Grzegorz
Jaroszyński, Andrzej
Jakubczak, Andrzej
author_sort Furmaga, Jacek
collection PubMed
description The BK polyomavirus (BKPyV), a representative of the family Polyomaviridae, is widespread in the human population. While the virus does not cause significant clinical symptoms in immunocompetent individuals, it is activated in cases of immune deficiency, both pharmacological and pathological. Infection with the BKPyV is of particular importance in recipients of kidney transplants or HSC transplantation, in which it can lead to the loss of the transplanted kidney or to haemorrhagic cystitis, respectively. Four main genotypes of the virus are distinguished on the basis of molecular differentiation. The most common genotype worldwide is genotype I, with a frequency of about 80%, followed by genotype IV (about 15%), while genotypes II and III are isolated only sporadically. The distribution of the molecular variants of the virus is associated with the region of origin. BKPyV subtype Ia is most common in Africa, Ib-1 in Southeast Asia, and Ib-2 in Europe, while Ic is the most common variant in Northeast Asia. The development of molecular methods has enabled significant improvement not only in BKPyV diagnostics, but in monitoring the effectiveness of treatment as well. Amplification of viral DNA from urine by PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and qPCR Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction) is a non-invasive method that can be used to confirm the presence of the genetic material of the virus and to determine the viral load. Sequencing techniques together with bioinformatics tools and databases can be used to determine variants of the virus, analyse their circulation in populations, identify relationships between them, and investigate the directions of evolution of the virus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8402805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84028052021-08-29 BK Polyomavirus—Biology, Genomic Variation and Diagnosis Furmaga, Jacek Kowalczyk, Marek Zapolski, Tomasz Furmaga, Olga Krakowski, Leszek Rudzki, Grzegorz Jaroszyński, Andrzej Jakubczak, Andrzej Viruses Review The BK polyomavirus (BKPyV), a representative of the family Polyomaviridae, is widespread in the human population. While the virus does not cause significant clinical symptoms in immunocompetent individuals, it is activated in cases of immune deficiency, both pharmacological and pathological. Infection with the BKPyV is of particular importance in recipients of kidney transplants or HSC transplantation, in which it can lead to the loss of the transplanted kidney or to haemorrhagic cystitis, respectively. Four main genotypes of the virus are distinguished on the basis of molecular differentiation. The most common genotype worldwide is genotype I, with a frequency of about 80%, followed by genotype IV (about 15%), while genotypes II and III are isolated only sporadically. The distribution of the molecular variants of the virus is associated with the region of origin. BKPyV subtype Ia is most common in Africa, Ib-1 in Southeast Asia, and Ib-2 in Europe, while Ic is the most common variant in Northeast Asia. The development of molecular methods has enabled significant improvement not only in BKPyV diagnostics, but in monitoring the effectiveness of treatment as well. Amplification of viral DNA from urine by PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and qPCR Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction) is a non-invasive method that can be used to confirm the presence of the genetic material of the virus and to determine the viral load. Sequencing techniques together with bioinformatics tools and databases can be used to determine variants of the virus, analyse their circulation in populations, identify relationships between them, and investigate the directions of evolution of the virus. MDPI 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8402805/ /pubmed/34452367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13081502 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Furmaga, Jacek
Kowalczyk, Marek
Zapolski, Tomasz
Furmaga, Olga
Krakowski, Leszek
Rudzki, Grzegorz
Jaroszyński, Andrzej
Jakubczak, Andrzej
BK Polyomavirus—Biology, Genomic Variation and Diagnosis
title BK Polyomavirus—Biology, Genomic Variation and Diagnosis
title_full BK Polyomavirus—Biology, Genomic Variation and Diagnosis
title_fullStr BK Polyomavirus—Biology, Genomic Variation and Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed BK Polyomavirus—Biology, Genomic Variation and Diagnosis
title_short BK Polyomavirus—Biology, Genomic Variation and Diagnosis
title_sort bk polyomavirus—biology, genomic variation and diagnosis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8402805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13081502
work_keys_str_mv AT furmagajacek bkpolyomavirusbiologygenomicvariationanddiagnosis
AT kowalczykmarek bkpolyomavirusbiologygenomicvariationanddiagnosis
AT zapolskitomasz bkpolyomavirusbiologygenomicvariationanddiagnosis
AT furmagaolga bkpolyomavirusbiologygenomicvariationanddiagnosis
AT krakowskileszek bkpolyomavirusbiologygenomicvariationanddiagnosis
AT rudzkigrzegorz bkpolyomavirusbiologygenomicvariationanddiagnosis
AT jaroszynskiandrzej bkpolyomavirusbiologygenomicvariationanddiagnosis
AT jakubczakandrzej bkpolyomavirusbiologygenomicvariationanddiagnosis