Cargando…

Data-driven gated PET/CT: implications for lesion segmentation and quantitation

BACKGROUND: Data-driven gating (DDG) can improve PET quantitation and alleviate many issues with patient motion. However, misregistration between DDG-PET and CT may occur due to the distinct temporal resolutions of PET and CT and can be mitigated by DDG-CT. Here, the effects of misregistration and r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, M. Allan, Pan, Tinsu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00411-5
_version_ 1783745946063994880
author Thomas, M. Allan
Pan, Tinsu
author_facet Thomas, M. Allan
Pan, Tinsu
author_sort Thomas, M. Allan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data-driven gating (DDG) can improve PET quantitation and alleviate many issues with patient motion. However, misregistration between DDG-PET and CT may occur due to the distinct temporal resolutions of PET and CT and can be mitigated by DDG-CT. Here, the effects of misregistration and respiratory motion on PET quantitation and lesion segmentation were assessed with a new DDG-PET/CT method. METHODS: A low-dose cine-CT was acquired in misregistered regions to enable both average CT (ACT) and DDG-CT. The following were compared: (1) baseline PET/CT, (2) PET/ACT (attenuation correction, AC = ACT), (3) DDG-PET (AC = helical CT), and (4) DDG-PET/CT (AC = DDG-CT). For DDG-PET, end-expiration (EE) data were derived from 50% of the total PET data at 30% from end-inspiration. For DDG-CT, EE phase CT data were extracted from cine-CT data by lung Hounsfield unit (HU) value and body contour. A total of 91 lesions from 16 consecutive patients were assessed for changes in standard uptake value (SUV), lesion glycolysis (LG), lesion volume, centroid-to-centroid distance (CCD), and DICE coefficients. RESULTS: Relative to baseline PET/CT, median changes in SUV(max) ± σ for all 91 lesions were 20 ± 43%, 26 ± 23%, and 66 ± 66%, respectively, for PET/ACT, DDG-PET, and DDG-PET/CT. Median changes in lesion volume were 0 ± 58%, − 36 ± 26%, and − 26 ± 40%. LG for individual lesions increased for PET/ACT and decreased for DDG-PET, but was not different for DDG-PET/CT. Changes in mean HU from baseline PET/CT were dramatic for most lesions in both PET/ACT and DDG-PET/CT, especially for lesions with mean HU < 0 at baseline. CCD and DICE were both affected more by motion correction with DDG-PET than improved registration with ACT or DDG-CT. CONCLUSION: As misregistration becomes more prominent, the impact of motion correction with DDG-PET is diminished. The potential benefits of DDG-PET toward accurate lesion segmentation and quantitation could only be fully realized when combined with DDG-CT. These results impress upon the necessity of ensuring both misregistration and motion correction are accounted for together to optimize the clinical utility of PET/CT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-021-00411-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8403089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84030892021-09-15 Data-driven gated PET/CT: implications for lesion segmentation and quantitation Thomas, M. Allan Pan, Tinsu EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Data-driven gating (DDG) can improve PET quantitation and alleviate many issues with patient motion. However, misregistration between DDG-PET and CT may occur due to the distinct temporal resolutions of PET and CT and can be mitigated by DDG-CT. Here, the effects of misregistration and respiratory motion on PET quantitation and lesion segmentation were assessed with a new DDG-PET/CT method. METHODS: A low-dose cine-CT was acquired in misregistered regions to enable both average CT (ACT) and DDG-CT. The following were compared: (1) baseline PET/CT, (2) PET/ACT (attenuation correction, AC = ACT), (3) DDG-PET (AC = helical CT), and (4) DDG-PET/CT (AC = DDG-CT). For DDG-PET, end-expiration (EE) data were derived from 50% of the total PET data at 30% from end-inspiration. For DDG-CT, EE phase CT data were extracted from cine-CT data by lung Hounsfield unit (HU) value and body contour. A total of 91 lesions from 16 consecutive patients were assessed for changes in standard uptake value (SUV), lesion glycolysis (LG), lesion volume, centroid-to-centroid distance (CCD), and DICE coefficients. RESULTS: Relative to baseline PET/CT, median changes in SUV(max) ± σ for all 91 lesions were 20 ± 43%, 26 ± 23%, and 66 ± 66%, respectively, for PET/ACT, DDG-PET, and DDG-PET/CT. Median changes in lesion volume were 0 ± 58%, − 36 ± 26%, and − 26 ± 40%. LG for individual lesions increased for PET/ACT and decreased for DDG-PET, but was not different for DDG-PET/CT. Changes in mean HU from baseline PET/CT were dramatic for most lesions in both PET/ACT and DDG-PET/CT, especially for lesions with mean HU < 0 at baseline. CCD and DICE were both affected more by motion correction with DDG-PET than improved registration with ACT or DDG-CT. CONCLUSION: As misregistration becomes more prominent, the impact of motion correction with DDG-PET is diminished. The potential benefits of DDG-PET toward accurate lesion segmentation and quantitation could only be fully realized when combined with DDG-CT. These results impress upon the necessity of ensuring both misregistration and motion correction are accounted for together to optimize the clinical utility of PET/CT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-021-00411-5. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8403089/ /pubmed/34453630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00411-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Thomas, M. Allan
Pan, Tinsu
Data-driven gated PET/CT: implications for lesion segmentation and quantitation
title Data-driven gated PET/CT: implications for lesion segmentation and quantitation
title_full Data-driven gated PET/CT: implications for lesion segmentation and quantitation
title_fullStr Data-driven gated PET/CT: implications for lesion segmentation and quantitation
title_full_unstemmed Data-driven gated PET/CT: implications for lesion segmentation and quantitation
title_short Data-driven gated PET/CT: implications for lesion segmentation and quantitation
title_sort data-driven gated pet/ct: implications for lesion segmentation and quantitation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00411-5
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasmallan datadrivengatedpetctimplicationsforlesionsegmentationandquantitation
AT pantinsu datadrivengatedpetctimplicationsforlesionsegmentationandquantitation