Cargando…

Association of Psychological Distress, Contextual Factors, and Individual Differences Among Citizen Responders

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the psychological risks of dispatched citizen responders who have participated in resuscitation attempts. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cross‐sectional survey study was performed with 102 citizen responders who participated in a resuscitation attempt from July 23, 2018, to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ries, Emma Slebsager, Kragh, Astrid Rolin, Dammeyer, Jesper, Folke, Fredrik, Andelius, Linn, Malta Hansen, Carolina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020378
_version_ 1783745966909685760
author Ries, Emma Slebsager
Kragh, Astrid Rolin
Dammeyer, Jesper
Folke, Fredrik
Andelius, Linn
Malta Hansen, Carolina
author_facet Ries, Emma Slebsager
Kragh, Astrid Rolin
Dammeyer, Jesper
Folke, Fredrik
Andelius, Linn
Malta Hansen, Carolina
author_sort Ries, Emma Slebsager
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about the psychological risks of dispatched citizen responders who have participated in resuscitation attempts. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cross‐sectional survey study was performed with 102 citizen responders who participated in a resuscitation attempt from July 23, 2018, to August 22, 2018, in the Capital Region of Denmark. Psychological distress, defined as symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, was assessed 3 weeks after the resuscitation attempt and measured with the Impact of Event Scale‐Revised. Perceived stress was measured with the Perceived Stress Scale. Individual differences were assessed as the personality traits of agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, and openness to experience with the Big Five Inventory, general self‐efficacy, and coping mechanisms (Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory). Associations between continuous variables were examined with the Pearson correlation. The associations between psychological distress levels and contextual factors and individual differences were analyzed in multivariable linear regression models to determine factors independently associated with psychological distress levels. The mean overall posttraumatic stress disorder score was 0.65 of 12; the mean perceived stress score was 7.61 of 40. The most common coping mechanisms were acceptance and emotional support. Low perceived stress was significantly associated with high general self‐efficacy, and high perceived stress was significantly associated with high scores on neuroticism and openness to experience. Non–healthcare professionals were less likely to report symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Citizen responders who participated in resuscitation reported low levels of psychological distress. Individual differences were significantly associated with levels of psychological distress and should be considered when engaging citizen responders in resuscitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8403282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84032822021-09-03 Association of Psychological Distress, Contextual Factors, and Individual Differences Among Citizen Responders Ries, Emma Slebsager Kragh, Astrid Rolin Dammeyer, Jesper Folke, Fredrik Andelius, Linn Malta Hansen, Carolina J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Little is known about the psychological risks of dispatched citizen responders who have participated in resuscitation attempts. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cross‐sectional survey study was performed with 102 citizen responders who participated in a resuscitation attempt from July 23, 2018, to August 22, 2018, in the Capital Region of Denmark. Psychological distress, defined as symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, was assessed 3 weeks after the resuscitation attempt and measured with the Impact of Event Scale‐Revised. Perceived stress was measured with the Perceived Stress Scale. Individual differences were assessed as the personality traits of agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, and openness to experience with the Big Five Inventory, general self‐efficacy, and coping mechanisms (Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory). Associations between continuous variables were examined with the Pearson correlation. The associations between psychological distress levels and contextual factors and individual differences were analyzed in multivariable linear regression models to determine factors independently associated with psychological distress levels. The mean overall posttraumatic stress disorder score was 0.65 of 12; the mean perceived stress score was 7.61 of 40. The most common coping mechanisms were acceptance and emotional support. Low perceived stress was significantly associated with high general self‐efficacy, and high perceived stress was significantly associated with high scores on neuroticism and openness to experience. Non–healthcare professionals were less likely to report symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Citizen responders who participated in resuscitation reported low levels of psychological distress. Individual differences were significantly associated with levels of psychological distress and should be considered when engaging citizen responders in resuscitation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8403282/ /pubmed/34212765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020378 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ries, Emma Slebsager
Kragh, Astrid Rolin
Dammeyer, Jesper
Folke, Fredrik
Andelius, Linn
Malta Hansen, Carolina
Association of Psychological Distress, Contextual Factors, and Individual Differences Among Citizen Responders
title Association of Psychological Distress, Contextual Factors, and Individual Differences Among Citizen Responders
title_full Association of Psychological Distress, Contextual Factors, and Individual Differences Among Citizen Responders
title_fullStr Association of Psychological Distress, Contextual Factors, and Individual Differences Among Citizen Responders
title_full_unstemmed Association of Psychological Distress, Contextual Factors, and Individual Differences Among Citizen Responders
title_short Association of Psychological Distress, Contextual Factors, and Individual Differences Among Citizen Responders
title_sort association of psychological distress, contextual factors, and individual differences among citizen responders
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020378
work_keys_str_mv AT riesemmaslebsager associationofpsychologicaldistresscontextualfactorsandindividualdifferencesamongcitizenresponders
AT kraghastridrolin associationofpsychologicaldistresscontextualfactorsandindividualdifferencesamongcitizenresponders
AT dammeyerjesper associationofpsychologicaldistresscontextualfactorsandindividualdifferencesamongcitizenresponders
AT folkefredrik associationofpsychologicaldistresscontextualfactorsandindividualdifferencesamongcitizenresponders
AT andeliuslinn associationofpsychologicaldistresscontextualfactorsandindividualdifferencesamongcitizenresponders
AT maltahansencarolina associationofpsychologicaldistresscontextualfactorsandindividualdifferencesamongcitizenresponders