Cargando…

Consistency of 3D femoral torsion measurement from MRI compared to CT gold standard

BACKGROUND: Several hip and knee pathologies are associated with aberrant femoral torsion. Diagnostic workup includes computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For three-dimensional (3D) analysis of complex deformities it would be desirable to measure femoral torsion from MRI da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Häller, Thomas Vincent, Schenk, Pascal, Jud, Lukas, Hoch, Armando, Götschi, Tobias, Zingg, Patrick Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04633-7
_version_ 1783745981299294208
author Häller, Thomas Vincent
Schenk, Pascal
Jud, Lukas
Hoch, Armando
Götschi, Tobias
Zingg, Patrick Oliver
author_facet Häller, Thomas Vincent
Schenk, Pascal
Jud, Lukas
Hoch, Armando
Götschi, Tobias
Zingg, Patrick Oliver
author_sort Häller, Thomas Vincent
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several hip and knee pathologies are associated with aberrant femoral torsion. Diagnostic workup includes computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For three-dimensional (3D) analysis of complex deformities it would be desirable to measure femoral torsion from MRI data to avoid ionizing radiation of CT in a young patient population. 3D measurement of femoral torsion from MRI has not yet been compared to measurements from CT images. We hypothesize that agreement will exist between MRI and CT 3D measurements of femoral torsion. METHODS: CT and MRI data from 29 hips of 15 patients with routine diagnostic workup for suspected femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) were used to generate 3D bone models. 3D measurement of femoral torsion was performed by two independent readers using the method of Kim et al. which is validated for CT. Inter-modalitiy and inter-reader intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. RESULTS: Between MRI and CT 3D measurements an ICC of 0.950 (0.898; 0.976) (reader 1) respectively 0.950 (0.897; 0.976) (Reader 2) was found. The ICC (95% CI) expressing the inter-reader reliability for both modalities was 0.945 (0.886; 0.973) for MRI and 0.957 (0.910; 0.979) for CT, respectively. Mean difference between CT and MRI measurement was 0.42° (MRI – CT, SD: 2.77°, p = 0.253). CONCLUSIONS: There was consistency between 3D measurements of femoral torsion between computer rendered MRI images compared to measurements with the “gold standard” of CT images. ICC for inter-modality and inter-reader consistency indicate excellent reliability. Accurate, reliable and reproducible 3D measurement of femoral torsion is possible from MRI images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8403345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84033452021-08-30 Consistency of 3D femoral torsion measurement from MRI compared to CT gold standard Häller, Thomas Vincent Schenk, Pascal Jud, Lukas Hoch, Armando Götschi, Tobias Zingg, Patrick Oliver BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Several hip and knee pathologies are associated with aberrant femoral torsion. Diagnostic workup includes computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For three-dimensional (3D) analysis of complex deformities it would be desirable to measure femoral torsion from MRI data to avoid ionizing radiation of CT in a young patient population. 3D measurement of femoral torsion from MRI has not yet been compared to measurements from CT images. We hypothesize that agreement will exist between MRI and CT 3D measurements of femoral torsion. METHODS: CT and MRI data from 29 hips of 15 patients with routine diagnostic workup for suspected femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) were used to generate 3D bone models. 3D measurement of femoral torsion was performed by two independent readers using the method of Kim et al. which is validated for CT. Inter-modalitiy and inter-reader intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. RESULTS: Between MRI and CT 3D measurements an ICC of 0.950 (0.898; 0.976) (reader 1) respectively 0.950 (0.897; 0.976) (Reader 2) was found. The ICC (95% CI) expressing the inter-reader reliability for both modalities was 0.945 (0.886; 0.973) for MRI and 0.957 (0.910; 0.979) for CT, respectively. Mean difference between CT and MRI measurement was 0.42° (MRI – CT, SD: 2.77°, p = 0.253). CONCLUSIONS: There was consistency between 3D measurements of femoral torsion between computer rendered MRI images compared to measurements with the “gold standard” of CT images. ICC for inter-modality and inter-reader consistency indicate excellent reliability. Accurate, reliable and reproducible 3D measurement of femoral torsion is possible from MRI images. BioMed Central 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8403345/ /pubmed/34454445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04633-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Häller, Thomas Vincent
Schenk, Pascal
Jud, Lukas
Hoch, Armando
Götschi, Tobias
Zingg, Patrick Oliver
Consistency of 3D femoral torsion measurement from MRI compared to CT gold standard
title Consistency of 3D femoral torsion measurement from MRI compared to CT gold standard
title_full Consistency of 3D femoral torsion measurement from MRI compared to CT gold standard
title_fullStr Consistency of 3D femoral torsion measurement from MRI compared to CT gold standard
title_full_unstemmed Consistency of 3D femoral torsion measurement from MRI compared to CT gold standard
title_short Consistency of 3D femoral torsion measurement from MRI compared to CT gold standard
title_sort consistency of 3d femoral torsion measurement from mri compared to ct gold standard
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04633-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hallerthomasvincent consistencyof3dfemoraltorsionmeasurementfrommricomparedtoctgoldstandard
AT schenkpascal consistencyof3dfemoraltorsionmeasurementfrommricomparedtoctgoldstandard
AT judlukas consistencyof3dfemoraltorsionmeasurementfrommricomparedtoctgoldstandard
AT hocharmando consistencyof3dfemoraltorsionmeasurementfrommricomparedtoctgoldstandard
AT gotschitobias consistencyof3dfemoraltorsionmeasurementfrommricomparedtoctgoldstandard
AT zinggpatrickoliver consistencyof3dfemoraltorsionmeasurementfrommricomparedtoctgoldstandard