Cargando…
Patient characteristics and outcome in three different working models of home-based rehabilitation: a longitudinal observational study in primary health care in Norway
BACKGROUND: The organisation of health care services for older adults varies within and between countries. In Norway, primary care physiotherapy services offer home-based rehabilitation to older adults. The aim of this study was to compare patients’ characteristics and treatment outcomes in three wo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06914-2 |
_version_ | 1783745993665150976 |
---|---|
author | Meisingset, Ingebrigt Bjerke, Joakim Taraldsen, Kristin Gunnes, Mari Sand, Sylvi Hansen, Anne E. Myhre, Gard Evensen, Kari Anne I. |
author_facet | Meisingset, Ingebrigt Bjerke, Joakim Taraldsen, Kristin Gunnes, Mari Sand, Sylvi Hansen, Anne E. Myhre, Gard Evensen, Kari Anne I. |
author_sort | Meisingset, Ingebrigt |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The organisation of health care services for older adults varies within and between countries. In Norway, primary care physiotherapy services offer home-based rehabilitation to older adults. The aim of this study was to compare patients’ characteristics and treatment outcomes in three working models of home-based rehabilitation. METHODS: Patients referred to home-based rehabilitation in a large municipality in Norway were invited to participate in this prospective observational study. The three working models, early intervention, reablement and regular physiotherapy, were organised according to the patients’ function and degree of independence. The older adults (≥ 65 years) were allocated to the different models by either a multidisciplinary group of health care personnel or by direct referral. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics, including physical function (Patient-specific functional scale, PSFS), physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery, SPPB) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) were registered at baseline and follow-up (maximum 6 months after baseline). One-way ANOVA was used to analyse group differences in clinical characteristics and paired t-tests to analyse changes from baseline to follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 603 and 402 patients (median (interquartile range) age: 84 (77–88) years) completed baseline and follow-up assessments, respectively. Patients in all three working models had an increased risk for functional decline. Patients receiving early intervention (n = 62) had significantly (p < 0.001) better physical performance and health-related quality of life (SPPB mean 7.9, SD 2.7; EQ-5D:mean 0.59, SD 0.19), than patients receiving reablement (n = 132) (SPPB: mean 5.5, SD 2.6; EQ-5D: mean 0.50, SD 0.15) and regular physiotherapy (n = 409) (SPPB: mean 5.6, SD 2.8; EQ-5D: mean 0.41, SD 0.22). At follow-up, the three working models showed significantly improvements in physical function (PSFS: mean change (95 % CI): 2.5 (1.9 to 3.2); 1.8 (0.5 to 3.1); 1.7 (0.8 to 2.6), for regular physiotherapy, reablement, and early intervention, respectively). Patients receiving regular physiotherapy and reablement also significantly improved physical performance and health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: While older adults receiving reablement and regular physiotherapy showed similar patient characteristics and treatment outcomes, early intervention identified older patients at risk of functional decline at an earlier stage. These results are relevant for policy makers when designing and improving prevention and rehabilitation strategies in primary health care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8403406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84034062021-08-30 Patient characteristics and outcome in three different working models of home-based rehabilitation: a longitudinal observational study in primary health care in Norway Meisingset, Ingebrigt Bjerke, Joakim Taraldsen, Kristin Gunnes, Mari Sand, Sylvi Hansen, Anne E. Myhre, Gard Evensen, Kari Anne I. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The organisation of health care services for older adults varies within and between countries. In Norway, primary care physiotherapy services offer home-based rehabilitation to older adults. The aim of this study was to compare patients’ characteristics and treatment outcomes in three working models of home-based rehabilitation. METHODS: Patients referred to home-based rehabilitation in a large municipality in Norway were invited to participate in this prospective observational study. The three working models, early intervention, reablement and regular physiotherapy, were organised according to the patients’ function and degree of independence. The older adults (≥ 65 years) were allocated to the different models by either a multidisciplinary group of health care personnel or by direct referral. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics, including physical function (Patient-specific functional scale, PSFS), physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery, SPPB) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) were registered at baseline and follow-up (maximum 6 months after baseline). One-way ANOVA was used to analyse group differences in clinical characteristics and paired t-tests to analyse changes from baseline to follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 603 and 402 patients (median (interquartile range) age: 84 (77–88) years) completed baseline and follow-up assessments, respectively. Patients in all three working models had an increased risk for functional decline. Patients receiving early intervention (n = 62) had significantly (p < 0.001) better physical performance and health-related quality of life (SPPB mean 7.9, SD 2.7; EQ-5D:mean 0.59, SD 0.19), than patients receiving reablement (n = 132) (SPPB: mean 5.5, SD 2.6; EQ-5D: mean 0.50, SD 0.15) and regular physiotherapy (n = 409) (SPPB: mean 5.6, SD 2.8; EQ-5D: mean 0.41, SD 0.22). At follow-up, the three working models showed significantly improvements in physical function (PSFS: mean change (95 % CI): 2.5 (1.9 to 3.2); 1.8 (0.5 to 3.1); 1.7 (0.8 to 2.6), for regular physiotherapy, reablement, and early intervention, respectively). Patients receiving regular physiotherapy and reablement also significantly improved physical performance and health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: While older adults receiving reablement and regular physiotherapy showed similar patient characteristics and treatment outcomes, early intervention identified older patients at risk of functional decline at an earlier stage. These results are relevant for policy makers when designing and improving prevention and rehabilitation strategies in primary health care. BioMed Central 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8403406/ /pubmed/34454475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06914-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Meisingset, Ingebrigt Bjerke, Joakim Taraldsen, Kristin Gunnes, Mari Sand, Sylvi Hansen, Anne E. Myhre, Gard Evensen, Kari Anne I. Patient characteristics and outcome in three different working models of home-based rehabilitation: a longitudinal observational study in primary health care in Norway |
title | Patient characteristics and outcome in three different working models of home-based rehabilitation: a longitudinal observational study in primary health care in Norway |
title_full | Patient characteristics and outcome in three different working models of home-based rehabilitation: a longitudinal observational study in primary health care in Norway |
title_fullStr | Patient characteristics and outcome in three different working models of home-based rehabilitation: a longitudinal observational study in primary health care in Norway |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient characteristics and outcome in three different working models of home-based rehabilitation: a longitudinal observational study in primary health care in Norway |
title_short | Patient characteristics and outcome in three different working models of home-based rehabilitation: a longitudinal observational study in primary health care in Norway |
title_sort | patient characteristics and outcome in three different working models of home-based rehabilitation: a longitudinal observational study in primary health care in norway |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06914-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meisingsetingebrigt patientcharacteristicsandoutcomeinthreedifferentworkingmodelsofhomebasedrehabilitationalongitudinalobservationalstudyinprimaryhealthcareinnorway AT bjerkejoakim patientcharacteristicsandoutcomeinthreedifferentworkingmodelsofhomebasedrehabilitationalongitudinalobservationalstudyinprimaryhealthcareinnorway AT taraldsenkristin patientcharacteristicsandoutcomeinthreedifferentworkingmodelsofhomebasedrehabilitationalongitudinalobservationalstudyinprimaryhealthcareinnorway AT gunnesmari patientcharacteristicsandoutcomeinthreedifferentworkingmodelsofhomebasedrehabilitationalongitudinalobservationalstudyinprimaryhealthcareinnorway AT sandsylvi patientcharacteristicsandoutcomeinthreedifferentworkingmodelsofhomebasedrehabilitationalongitudinalobservationalstudyinprimaryhealthcareinnorway AT hansenannee patientcharacteristicsandoutcomeinthreedifferentworkingmodelsofhomebasedrehabilitationalongitudinalobservationalstudyinprimaryhealthcareinnorway AT myhregard patientcharacteristicsandoutcomeinthreedifferentworkingmodelsofhomebasedrehabilitationalongitudinalobservationalstudyinprimaryhealthcareinnorway AT evensenkariannei patientcharacteristicsandoutcomeinthreedifferentworkingmodelsofhomebasedrehabilitationalongitudinalobservationalstudyinprimaryhealthcareinnorway |