Cargando…

Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments

BACKGROUND: Gait impairments are among the most common and impactful symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Recent technological advances aim to quantify these impairments using low-cost wearable systems for use in either supervised clinical consultations or long-term unsupervised monitoring of gait...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alberto, Sara, Cabral, Sílvia, Proença, João, Pona-Ferreira, Filipa, Leitão, Mariana, Bouça-Machado, Raquel, Kauppila, Linda Azevedo, Veloso, António P., Costa, Rui M., Ferreira, Joaquim J., Matias, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02354-x
_version_ 1783746002630475776
author Alberto, Sara
Cabral, Sílvia
Proença, João
Pona-Ferreira, Filipa
Leitão, Mariana
Bouça-Machado, Raquel
Kauppila, Linda Azevedo
Veloso, António P.
Costa, Rui M.
Ferreira, Joaquim J.
Matias, Ricardo
author_facet Alberto, Sara
Cabral, Sílvia
Proença, João
Pona-Ferreira, Filipa
Leitão, Mariana
Bouça-Machado, Raquel
Kauppila, Linda Azevedo
Veloso, António P.
Costa, Rui M.
Ferreira, Joaquim J.
Matias, Ricardo
author_sort Alberto, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gait impairments are among the most common and impactful symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Recent technological advances aim to quantify these impairments using low-cost wearable systems for use in either supervised clinical consultations or long-term unsupervised monitoring of gait in ecological environments. However, very few of these wearable systems have been validated comparatively to a criterion of established validity. OBJECTIVE: We developed two movement analysis solutions (3D full-body kinematics based on inertial sensors, and a smartphone application) in which validity was assessed versus the optoelectronic criterion in a population of PD patients. METHODS: Nineteen subjects with PD (7 female) participated in the study (age: 62 ± 12.27 years; disease duration: 6.39 ± 3.70 years; HY: 2 ± 0.23). Each participant underwent a gait analysis whilst barefoot, at a self-selected speed, for a distance of 3 times 10 m in a straight line, assessed simultaneously with all three systems. RESULTS: Our results show excellent agreement between either solution and the optoelectronic criterion. Both systems differentiate between PD patients and healthy controls, and between PD patients in ON or OFF medication states (normal difference distributions pooled from published research in PD patients in ON and OFF states that included an age-matched healthy control group). Fair to high waveform similarity and mean absolute errors below the mean relative orientation accuracy of the equipment were found when comparing the angular kinematics between the full-body inertial sensor-based system and the optoelectronic criterion. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the presented solutions produce accurate results and can capture clinically relevant parameters using commodity wearable sensors or a simple smartphone. This validation will hopefully enable the adoption of these systems for supervised and unsupervised gait analysis in clinical practice and clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8403450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84034502021-08-30 Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments Alberto, Sara Cabral, Sílvia Proença, João Pona-Ferreira, Filipa Leitão, Mariana Bouça-Machado, Raquel Kauppila, Linda Azevedo Veloso, António P. Costa, Rui M. Ferreira, Joaquim J. Matias, Ricardo BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Gait impairments are among the most common and impactful symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Recent technological advances aim to quantify these impairments using low-cost wearable systems for use in either supervised clinical consultations or long-term unsupervised monitoring of gait in ecological environments. However, very few of these wearable systems have been validated comparatively to a criterion of established validity. OBJECTIVE: We developed two movement analysis solutions (3D full-body kinematics based on inertial sensors, and a smartphone application) in which validity was assessed versus the optoelectronic criterion in a population of PD patients. METHODS: Nineteen subjects with PD (7 female) participated in the study (age: 62 ± 12.27 years; disease duration: 6.39 ± 3.70 years; HY: 2 ± 0.23). Each participant underwent a gait analysis whilst barefoot, at a self-selected speed, for a distance of 3 times 10 m in a straight line, assessed simultaneously with all three systems. RESULTS: Our results show excellent agreement between either solution and the optoelectronic criterion. Both systems differentiate between PD patients and healthy controls, and between PD patients in ON or OFF medication states (normal difference distributions pooled from published research in PD patients in ON and OFF states that included an age-matched healthy control group). Fair to high waveform similarity and mean absolute errors below the mean relative orientation accuracy of the equipment were found when comparing the angular kinematics between the full-body inertial sensor-based system and the optoelectronic criterion. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the presented solutions produce accurate results and can capture clinically relevant parameters using commodity wearable sensors or a simple smartphone. This validation will hopefully enable the adoption of these systems for supervised and unsupervised gait analysis in clinical practice and clinical trials. BioMed Central 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8403450/ /pubmed/34454453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02354-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alberto, Sara
Cabral, Sílvia
Proença, João
Pona-Ferreira, Filipa
Leitão, Mariana
Bouça-Machado, Raquel
Kauppila, Linda Azevedo
Veloso, António P.
Costa, Rui M.
Ferreira, Joaquim J.
Matias, Ricardo
Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments
title Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments
title_full Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments
title_fullStr Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments
title_full_unstemmed Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments
title_short Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments
title_sort validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02354-x
work_keys_str_mv AT albertosara validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments
AT cabralsilvia validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments
AT proencajoao validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments
AT ponaferreirafilipa validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments
AT leitaomariana validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments
AT boucamachadoraquel validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments
AT kauppilalindaazevedo validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments
AT velosoantoniop validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments
AT costaruim validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments
AT ferreirajoaquimj validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments
AT matiasricardo validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments