Cargando…
Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments
BACKGROUND: Gait impairments are among the most common and impactful symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Recent technological advances aim to quantify these impairments using low-cost wearable systems for use in either supervised clinical consultations or long-term unsupervised monitoring of gait...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02354-x |
_version_ | 1783746002630475776 |
---|---|
author | Alberto, Sara Cabral, Sílvia Proença, João Pona-Ferreira, Filipa Leitão, Mariana Bouça-Machado, Raquel Kauppila, Linda Azevedo Veloso, António P. Costa, Rui M. Ferreira, Joaquim J. Matias, Ricardo |
author_facet | Alberto, Sara Cabral, Sílvia Proença, João Pona-Ferreira, Filipa Leitão, Mariana Bouça-Machado, Raquel Kauppila, Linda Azevedo Veloso, António P. Costa, Rui M. Ferreira, Joaquim J. Matias, Ricardo |
author_sort | Alberto, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gait impairments are among the most common and impactful symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Recent technological advances aim to quantify these impairments using low-cost wearable systems for use in either supervised clinical consultations or long-term unsupervised monitoring of gait in ecological environments. However, very few of these wearable systems have been validated comparatively to a criterion of established validity. OBJECTIVE: We developed two movement analysis solutions (3D full-body kinematics based on inertial sensors, and a smartphone application) in which validity was assessed versus the optoelectronic criterion in a population of PD patients. METHODS: Nineteen subjects with PD (7 female) participated in the study (age: 62 ± 12.27 years; disease duration: 6.39 ± 3.70 years; HY: 2 ± 0.23). Each participant underwent a gait analysis whilst barefoot, at a self-selected speed, for a distance of 3 times 10 m in a straight line, assessed simultaneously with all three systems. RESULTS: Our results show excellent agreement between either solution and the optoelectronic criterion. Both systems differentiate between PD patients and healthy controls, and between PD patients in ON or OFF medication states (normal difference distributions pooled from published research in PD patients in ON and OFF states that included an age-matched healthy control group). Fair to high waveform similarity and mean absolute errors below the mean relative orientation accuracy of the equipment were found when comparing the angular kinematics between the full-body inertial sensor-based system and the optoelectronic criterion. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the presented solutions produce accurate results and can capture clinically relevant parameters using commodity wearable sensors or a simple smartphone. This validation will hopefully enable the adoption of these systems for supervised and unsupervised gait analysis in clinical practice and clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8403450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84034502021-08-30 Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments Alberto, Sara Cabral, Sílvia Proença, João Pona-Ferreira, Filipa Leitão, Mariana Bouça-Machado, Raquel Kauppila, Linda Azevedo Veloso, António P. Costa, Rui M. Ferreira, Joaquim J. Matias, Ricardo BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Gait impairments are among the most common and impactful symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Recent technological advances aim to quantify these impairments using low-cost wearable systems for use in either supervised clinical consultations or long-term unsupervised monitoring of gait in ecological environments. However, very few of these wearable systems have been validated comparatively to a criterion of established validity. OBJECTIVE: We developed two movement analysis solutions (3D full-body kinematics based on inertial sensors, and a smartphone application) in which validity was assessed versus the optoelectronic criterion in a population of PD patients. METHODS: Nineteen subjects with PD (7 female) participated in the study (age: 62 ± 12.27 years; disease duration: 6.39 ± 3.70 years; HY: 2 ± 0.23). Each participant underwent a gait analysis whilst barefoot, at a self-selected speed, for a distance of 3 times 10 m in a straight line, assessed simultaneously with all three systems. RESULTS: Our results show excellent agreement between either solution and the optoelectronic criterion. Both systems differentiate between PD patients and healthy controls, and between PD patients in ON or OFF medication states (normal difference distributions pooled from published research in PD patients in ON and OFF states that included an age-matched healthy control group). Fair to high waveform similarity and mean absolute errors below the mean relative orientation accuracy of the equipment were found when comparing the angular kinematics between the full-body inertial sensor-based system and the optoelectronic criterion. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the presented solutions produce accurate results and can capture clinically relevant parameters using commodity wearable sensors or a simple smartphone. This validation will hopefully enable the adoption of these systems for supervised and unsupervised gait analysis in clinical practice and clinical trials. BioMed Central 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8403450/ /pubmed/34454453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02354-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Alberto, Sara Cabral, Sílvia Proença, João Pona-Ferreira, Filipa Leitão, Mariana Bouça-Machado, Raquel Kauppila, Linda Azevedo Veloso, António P. Costa, Rui M. Ferreira, Joaquim J. Matias, Ricardo Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments |
title | Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments |
title_full | Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments |
title_fullStr | Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments |
title_short | Validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for Parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments |
title_sort | validation of quantitative gait analysis systems for parkinson’s disease for use in supervised and unsupervised environments |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02354-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albertosara validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments AT cabralsilvia validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments AT proencajoao validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments AT ponaferreirafilipa validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments AT leitaomariana validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments AT boucamachadoraquel validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments AT kauppilalindaazevedo validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments AT velosoantoniop validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments AT costaruim validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments AT ferreirajoaquimj validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments AT matiasricardo validationofquantitativegaitanalysissystemsforparkinsonsdiseaseforuseinsupervisedandunsupervisedenvironments |