Cargando…

A Biologic Surgical Implant in Complex Abdominal Wall Repair: 3-Year Follow-Up Results of a Multicentric Prospective Study

PURPOSE: Despite the advancements in the reinforcement and closure techniques available, complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) remains a challenging surgical undertaking with considerable risk of postoperative complications. Biological meshes were developed that may help to complement standar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gossetti, Francesco, Zuegel, Nikolaus, Giordano, Pasquale, Pullan, Rupert, Schuld, Jochen, Delrio, Paolo, Montorsi, Marco, van Kerschaver, Olivier, Lemaitre, Jean, Griffiths, Ben, D’Amore, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34471389
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S297897
_version_ 1783746026700537856
author Gossetti, Francesco
Zuegel, Nikolaus
Giordano, Pasquale
Pullan, Rupert
Schuld, Jochen
Delrio, Paolo
Montorsi, Marco
van Kerschaver, Olivier
Lemaitre, Jean
Griffiths, Ben
D’Amore, Linda
author_facet Gossetti, Francesco
Zuegel, Nikolaus
Giordano, Pasquale
Pullan, Rupert
Schuld, Jochen
Delrio, Paolo
Montorsi, Marco
van Kerschaver, Olivier
Lemaitre, Jean
Griffiths, Ben
D’Amore, Linda
author_sort Gossetti, Francesco
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Despite the advancements in the reinforcement and closure techniques available, complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) remains a challenging surgical undertaking with considerable risk of postoperative complications. Biological meshes were developed that may help to complement standard closure techniques and offer an alternative to synthetic meshes, which carry significant risks with their use in complex cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 114 patients underwent surgical treatment for CAWR with a Permacol™ (a biologic surgical implant). The study objective was to evaluate the short-term (6 months), mid-term (12–24 months), and long-term (36 months) clinical outcomes (through 36 months) associated with the use of a biologic surgical implant in these cases. RESULTS: The cumulative hernia recurrence rate was 18.7% (17/91) at 24 months and 22.4% (19/85) at 36 months. Twelve (14.1%) subjects required reoperation for hernia repair within 36 months for repair of recurrent hernias. Between 6- and 36-months post-surgery, patients reported improvement in their Carolina comfort scale (CSS) measures of severity of pain, sensation of mesh, and movement limitations. CONCLUSION: A biologic surgical implant can provide long-term benefit to complex abdominal wall repairs in patients staged grade III according to the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8403569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84035692021-08-31 A Biologic Surgical Implant in Complex Abdominal Wall Repair: 3-Year Follow-Up Results of a Multicentric Prospective Study Gossetti, Francesco Zuegel, Nikolaus Giordano, Pasquale Pullan, Rupert Schuld, Jochen Delrio, Paolo Montorsi, Marco van Kerschaver, Olivier Lemaitre, Jean Griffiths, Ben D’Amore, Linda Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research PURPOSE: Despite the advancements in the reinforcement and closure techniques available, complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) remains a challenging surgical undertaking with considerable risk of postoperative complications. Biological meshes were developed that may help to complement standard closure techniques and offer an alternative to synthetic meshes, which carry significant risks with their use in complex cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 114 patients underwent surgical treatment for CAWR with a Permacol™ (a biologic surgical implant). The study objective was to evaluate the short-term (6 months), mid-term (12–24 months), and long-term (36 months) clinical outcomes (through 36 months) associated with the use of a biologic surgical implant in these cases. RESULTS: The cumulative hernia recurrence rate was 18.7% (17/91) at 24 months and 22.4% (19/85) at 36 months. Twelve (14.1%) subjects required reoperation for hernia repair within 36 months for repair of recurrent hernias. Between 6- and 36-months post-surgery, patients reported improvement in their Carolina comfort scale (CSS) measures of severity of pain, sensation of mesh, and movement limitations. CONCLUSION: A biologic surgical implant can provide long-term benefit to complex abdominal wall repairs in patients staged grade III according to the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG). Dove 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8403569/ /pubmed/34471389 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S297897 Text en © 2021 Gossetti et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gossetti, Francesco
Zuegel, Nikolaus
Giordano, Pasquale
Pullan, Rupert
Schuld, Jochen
Delrio, Paolo
Montorsi, Marco
van Kerschaver, Olivier
Lemaitre, Jean
Griffiths, Ben
D’Amore, Linda
A Biologic Surgical Implant in Complex Abdominal Wall Repair: 3-Year Follow-Up Results of a Multicentric Prospective Study
title A Biologic Surgical Implant in Complex Abdominal Wall Repair: 3-Year Follow-Up Results of a Multicentric Prospective Study
title_full A Biologic Surgical Implant in Complex Abdominal Wall Repair: 3-Year Follow-Up Results of a Multicentric Prospective Study
title_fullStr A Biologic Surgical Implant in Complex Abdominal Wall Repair: 3-Year Follow-Up Results of a Multicentric Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed A Biologic Surgical Implant in Complex Abdominal Wall Repair: 3-Year Follow-Up Results of a Multicentric Prospective Study
title_short A Biologic Surgical Implant in Complex Abdominal Wall Repair: 3-Year Follow-Up Results of a Multicentric Prospective Study
title_sort biologic surgical implant in complex abdominal wall repair: 3-year follow-up results of a multicentric prospective study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34471389
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S297897
work_keys_str_mv AT gossettifrancesco abiologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT zuegelnikolaus abiologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT giordanopasquale abiologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT pullanrupert abiologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT schuldjochen abiologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT delriopaolo abiologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT montorsimarco abiologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT vankerschaverolivier abiologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT lemaitrejean abiologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT griffithsben abiologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT damorelinda abiologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT gossettifrancesco biologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT zuegelnikolaus biologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT giordanopasquale biologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT pullanrupert biologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT schuldjochen biologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT delriopaolo biologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT montorsimarco biologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT vankerschaverolivier biologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT lemaitrejean biologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT griffithsben biologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy
AT damorelinda biologicsurgicalimplantincomplexabdominalwallrepair3yearfollowupresultsofamulticentricprospectivestudy