Cargando…

Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension on brain MRI

PURPOSE: Aim of this study was to develop quantitative parameters for diagnosing Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) using brain MRI scans. METHODS: This is a case control study with 48 cases and 192 matched controls. Optic nerve diameter (OND), Pituitary height (PH), Meckel’s cave diameter (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marashdeh, Wael M., Al Qaralleh, Mohammad A., Hdeeb, Ahmad H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100371
_version_ 1783746048644087808
author Marashdeh, Wael M.
Al Qaralleh, Mohammad A.
Hdeeb, Ahmad H.
author_facet Marashdeh, Wael M.
Al Qaralleh, Mohammad A.
Hdeeb, Ahmad H.
author_sort Marashdeh, Wael M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Aim of this study was to develop quantitative parameters for diagnosing Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) using brain MRI scans. METHODS: This is a case control study with 48 cases and 192 matched controls. Optic nerve diameter (OND), Pituitary height (PH), Meckel’s cave diameter (MCD), and Neck fat thickness (NFT) were measured for both groups. Consequently, means were obtained for the different parameters in both groups with subsequent establishment of best cutoffs using Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: For IIH patients the means of OND, PH, MCD, and NFT were 6.2 mm, 3.9 mm, 5 mm, 1.4 cm, respectively while for controls the means were 4.6 mm, 4.5 mm, 4.3 mm, and 0.8 cm with statistical significance between the two groups. ROC analysis showed the cutoff points with best accuracy for the above parameters in diagnosing IIH to be 5.4 mm for OND with sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.85 representing high accuracy, while for PH a cutoff point of 3 mm showed low accuracy with sensitivity of 0.54 and specificity of 0.7, and a MCD cutoff of 4.5 mm also showed low accuracy with sensitivity of 0.6 and specificity of 0.59, meanwhile a cutoff point of 1.1 cm for NFT was moderately accurate with sensitivity of 0.70 and specificity of 0.81. CONCLUSION: Statistical difference in the means for OND, PH, MCD, and NFT between IIH patients and controls is established. Also, we provide cut off points for these parameters to diagnose IIH on brain MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8403732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84037322021-09-02 Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension on brain MRI Marashdeh, Wael M. Al Qaralleh, Mohammad A. Hdeeb, Ahmad H. Eur J Radiol Open Article PURPOSE: Aim of this study was to develop quantitative parameters for diagnosing Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) using brain MRI scans. METHODS: This is a case control study with 48 cases and 192 matched controls. Optic nerve diameter (OND), Pituitary height (PH), Meckel’s cave diameter (MCD), and Neck fat thickness (NFT) were measured for both groups. Consequently, means were obtained for the different parameters in both groups with subsequent establishment of best cutoffs using Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: For IIH patients the means of OND, PH, MCD, and NFT were 6.2 mm, 3.9 mm, 5 mm, 1.4 cm, respectively while for controls the means were 4.6 mm, 4.5 mm, 4.3 mm, and 0.8 cm with statistical significance between the two groups. ROC analysis showed the cutoff points with best accuracy for the above parameters in diagnosing IIH to be 5.4 mm for OND with sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.85 representing high accuracy, while for PH a cutoff point of 3 mm showed low accuracy with sensitivity of 0.54 and specificity of 0.7, and a MCD cutoff of 4.5 mm also showed low accuracy with sensitivity of 0.6 and specificity of 0.59, meanwhile a cutoff point of 1.1 cm for NFT was moderately accurate with sensitivity of 0.70 and specificity of 0.81. CONCLUSION: Statistical difference in the means for OND, PH, MCD, and NFT between IIH patients and controls is established. Also, we provide cut off points for these parameters to diagnose IIH on brain MRI. Elsevier 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8403732/ /pubmed/34485627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100371 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Marashdeh, Wael M.
Al Qaralleh, Mohammad A.
Hdeeb, Ahmad H.
Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension on brain MRI
title Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension on brain MRI
title_full Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension on brain MRI
title_fullStr Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension on brain MRI
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension on brain MRI
title_short Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension on brain MRI
title_sort quantitative parameters for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension on brain mri
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100371
work_keys_str_mv AT marashdehwaelm quantitativeparametersfordiagnosisofidiopathicintracranialhypertensiononbrainmri
AT alqarallehmohammada quantitativeparametersfordiagnosisofidiopathicintracranialhypertensiononbrainmri
AT hdeebahmadh quantitativeparametersfordiagnosisofidiopathicintracranialhypertensiononbrainmri