Cargando…

Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There is limited literature on the polishability of new launched nanofilled and nanohybrid. The aim of this study is to evaluate the polishability of nanofilled and nanohybrid composites by measuring surface roughness and gloss values and explore the surface qualities of composit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lu, Yu, Peng, Wang, Xiao-Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34484588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.03.003
_version_ 1783746057750970368
author Zhang, Lu
Yu, Peng
Wang, Xiao-Yan
author_facet Zhang, Lu
Yu, Peng
Wang, Xiao-Yan
author_sort Zhang, Lu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There is limited literature on the polishability of new launched nanofilled and nanohybrid. The aim of this study is to evaluate the polishability of nanofilled and nanohybrid composites by measuring surface roughness and gloss values and explore the surface qualities of composite before and after polishing in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One nanofilled resin composite, two nanohybrid resin composites and one microhybrid resin composite were selected. All specimens were light cured against celluloid matrix strips. Then surface roughness(Ra) and gloss(GU) values were tested as negative control. Specimens were roughened with a 600-grit silicon carbide paper for 30 s to serve as positive control and then polished with Sof-Lex polishing disk system. Mean Ra and GU values of each step were measured with a profilometer and a small-area glossmeter. The surface qualities were observed by scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: Ra values of polished surfaces were significantly higher than negative control and lower than positive control(P < 0.05). All materials showed no significant difference on Ra values after polishing(P > 0.05). GU values of polished surfaces were significantly lower than negative control and higher than positive control(P < 0.05). After polishing the microhybrid resin composite showed lower GU values than nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composite groups. The SEM images showed surface textures and irregularities were corresponded to the results of surface roughness and gloss. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were noted on surface roughness among nanofilled, nanohybrid, and microhybrid composites after polishing with Sof-Lex disc system. Microhybrid composite presented lower gloss values than nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8403785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84037852021-09-03 Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites Zhang, Lu Yu, Peng Wang, Xiao-Yan J Dent Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There is limited literature on the polishability of new launched nanofilled and nanohybrid. The aim of this study is to evaluate the polishability of nanofilled and nanohybrid composites by measuring surface roughness and gloss values and explore the surface qualities of composite before and after polishing in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One nanofilled resin composite, two nanohybrid resin composites and one microhybrid resin composite were selected. All specimens were light cured against celluloid matrix strips. Then surface roughness(Ra) and gloss(GU) values were tested as negative control. Specimens were roughened with a 600-grit silicon carbide paper for 30 s to serve as positive control and then polished with Sof-Lex polishing disk system. Mean Ra and GU values of each step were measured with a profilometer and a small-area glossmeter. The surface qualities were observed by scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: Ra values of polished surfaces were significantly higher than negative control and lower than positive control(P < 0.05). All materials showed no significant difference on Ra values after polishing(P > 0.05). GU values of polished surfaces were significantly lower than negative control and higher than positive control(P < 0.05). After polishing the microhybrid resin composite showed lower GU values than nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composite groups. The SEM images showed surface textures and irregularities were corresponded to the results of surface roughness and gloss. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were noted on surface roughness among nanofilled, nanohybrid, and microhybrid composites after polishing with Sof-Lex disc system. Microhybrid composite presented lower gloss values than nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites. Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2021-10 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8403785/ /pubmed/34484588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.03.003 Text en © 2021 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Lu
Yu, Peng
Wang, Xiao-Yan
Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites
title Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites
title_full Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites
title_fullStr Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites
title_full_unstemmed Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites
title_short Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites
title_sort surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34484588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.03.003
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanglu surfaceroughnessandglossofpolishednanofilledandnanohybridresincomposites
AT yupeng surfaceroughnessandglossofpolishednanofilledandnanohybridresincomposites
AT wangxiaoyan surfaceroughnessandglossofpolishednanofilledandnanohybridresincomposites